Program Notes

Support Lorenzo on Patreon.com
https://www.patreon.com/lorenzohagerty
Guest speaker: Terence McKenna

Minoan Crete

Date this lecture was recorded: June 24, 1989.

[NOTE: All quotations are by Terence McKenna.]

“Addiction to natural substances, with the exception of tobacco, is something you really have to work at.”

“There is something really insidious about synthetic drugs, about concentrating what is a vegetable essence, and very diffuse. Opium was no problem until morphine came along.”

“One of the things I think we have to disabuse ourselves of is that science knows anything about these things. The human studies were never done.”

“You may have the notion that we are a minority that feels this is important and there is a majority that feels that it’s unimportant. That isn’t the case. We are a minority who feels this is important, and there is a majority that knows nothing about it whatsoever, has no data, and no realization of what it is.”

“People such as ourselves, we are the cutting edge of neuro-psychopharmacology, because the content is the frontier, and these scientists know very little about it.”

“The official version of what can happen with these hallucinogens is very limited. There was never stress on content. The individual content of the psychedelic trip was treated like the ravings of a psychotic. In other words, it was never examined from the point of view that this person might be a reliable witness.”

“What does it mean that the most powerful of all hallucinogens occurs naturally in the human brain? What does it mean that the most powerful of all natural hallucinogens is the shortest acting?”

The Lands of the Saracen by Bayard Taylor
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10924

Download a free copy of Lorenzo’s latest book
The Chronicles of Lorenzo - Volume 1

Previous Episode

590 - Understanding Chaos at History’s End – Part 2

Next Episode

592 - Understanding Chaos at History’s End – Part 4

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

This program was originally posted on the Psychedelic Salon’s first-run Patreon feed

00:00:06

three months ago. As you know, I’m publishing new Salon 1.0 programs first on Patreon

00:00:12

as a way to thank my supporters there. Additionally, for only $1 a month,

00:00:17

they can also join me every Monday evening for a live edition of the Salon,

00:00:22

where we sometimes jointly interview featured speakers

00:00:25

whose conversations I also publish on the podcast from time to time.

00:00:29

Now, here is the program from which you heard a preview three months ago. Linguistic Archit. L-V-E-C-H-I-N-G-S Greetings from Cyberdelic Space.

00:00:52

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:56

And I want to welcome all of our new salonners to this Salon 3.0 first-run podcast being streamed on Patreon.

00:01:03

Salon 3.0, first run podcast being streamed on Patreon.

00:01:10

As you know, in three months, this entire program will also be streamed on my original salon feeds.

00:01:13

And I’ll put a little sample of this podcast up there this week as well.

00:01:23

That way, should the rest of our fellow salonners not want to wait until February of 2019 to listen to this entire Terrence McKenna talk,

00:01:25

well, it’ll only cost them a dollar a month.

00:01:30

And that also includes admission each and every Monday evening to the live version of this salon.

00:01:33

That’s right, every Monday night at 6.30 p.m. Pacific Time,

00:01:37

the Psychedelic Salon goes live.

00:01:39

And each Monday around noon,

00:01:41

I send a personal email to all of my supporters on Patreon,

00:01:45

and that’s where they’ll find the link for that night’s live salon.

00:01:49

Although our numbers are still small, well, we’ve still had fellow salonners from Russia,

00:01:54

Uruguay, Slovenia, New Zealand, England, Australia, several other countries,

00:01:59

and, well, from all over the states join us.

00:02:02

And you’re free to just call in by phone and lurk if you like.

00:02:06

You know, it’s just a nice friendly chat around our little electronic fire,

00:02:10

and I hope that you make it once in a while.

00:02:13

In fact, tomorrow, November 19th,

00:02:16

our guests in the live salon will be Michael McCoy and Jeff McGee,

00:02:20

two filmmakers who have just completed a three-year odyssey

00:02:24

following Peter Gorman around

00:02:25

the jungle and in other adventures, and well, they documented it with over 400 hours of video.

00:02:32

And the film’s a little shorter than that, though. They’ve actually neatly edited it down to about

00:02:37

an hour and a half. So, if you are interested in jungle adventures, well, I hope you’ll tune in

00:02:43

tomorrow night.

00:02:48

Now, when the cassette tape recording of Terrence’s lecture ran out last week,

00:02:51

well, it left us with a little cliffhanger.

00:02:56

So you can imagine my trepidation when I digitize the next tape in the series,

00:02:59

and I hope to see if there was continuity.

00:03:04

Well, what I’m going to do right now is to play that end of the recording from last week, and then I’ll follow it with today’s tape.

00:03:08

And suddenly, sites where no walls were built for 2,000 years,

00:03:16

walls begin to rise all over the world.

00:03:19

And it’s clear that there are now haves and have-nots.

00:03:27

And now, imagine my pleasure when the following came up on the next tape of the June 1989

00:03:34

Terence McKenna Workshop at the Esalen Institute near Big Sur, California.

00:03:41

And the pastoral civilizations that are devoted to the great goddess retreat behind high walls.

00:03:50

In 6500 BC, these chariot people sweep down and they destroy Chatal Yuyuk.

00:03:56

That ends it. That ends the goddess, the great goddess,

00:04:02

as the unchallenged icon of the human image of the sacred in the

00:04:07

Middle East. Now there are a series of goddesses then, but progressively through time their consort

00:04:14

becomes more and more important. And then by the time you get to what I was taught in school were the great early civilizations,

00:04:26

Sumer, Ur, Chaldea, Babylon, and Egypt.

00:04:31

By the time you get to those civilizations, it’s a total ego trip, a god-king.

00:04:39

Everybody has hierarchically oriented themselves toward the ruler,

00:04:44

who is the visible manifestation of God.

00:04:48

He owns everything and it’s always a he.

00:04:52

So what has happened here is that in the absence of the mushroom,

00:04:58

agriculture rather than pastoralism,

00:05:02

city building rather than nomoralism, city building, rather than nomadism,

00:05:06

and the aggrandizement of the ego

00:05:08

have put themselves in place.

00:05:11

And then the last remnants of Chattal

00:05:17

go to Minoan Crete,

00:05:21

where they carry on for a few millennia a unique islanded uh partnership

00:05:29

society but what’s going on throughout the rest of the world is this ego uh male dominator style

00:05:39

of which we are the inheritors and the perfectors because there are other wrinkles which come along through time.

00:05:47

This clash between these wheeled chariot vehicle people

00:05:51

and these pastoralists creates then the Indo-European amalgam,

00:05:58

which is the inspiration for the Avestan literature,

00:06:02

the inspiration for the Rick Vedas.

00:06:05

And what I want to say is

00:06:08

that at this point begins

00:06:10

a frantic search for substitutes

00:06:14

for the original connection

00:06:17

to the goddess.

00:06:19

And what also begins is

00:06:21

the sense of abandonment,

00:06:23

the sense of existentialment, the sense of existential

00:06:25

embeddedness in history

00:06:28

the sense of loss of control

00:06:30

and

00:06:31

plants like

00:06:33

Amanita muscaria, Wasson’s

00:06:36

candidate for Soma

00:06:37

Pagamon harmala

00:06:39

David Flattery’s

00:06:42

candidate for Soma

00:06:44

this book that I

00:06:45

asked Kamran to look at

00:06:47

some of the rest of you may be interested

00:06:49

this is the most recent

00:06:52

important book

00:06:53

about drugs to be published

00:06:56

it’s called Haulma

00:06:57

and Harmaline

00:06:59

and it’s by David Flattery

00:07:01

it’s Middle

00:07:02

Near Eastern Studies publication number 21.

00:07:07

You can order it

00:07:08

from UC Press

00:07:10

on your credit card

00:07:11

if you need a copy.

00:07:14

And it will argue

00:07:15

that Soma was not

00:07:16

Amanita muscaria,

00:07:17

that it was Pergamon harmala.

00:07:19

And it makes a strong case.

00:07:21

I mean, I regard now

00:07:22

the whole question

00:07:23

as totally reopened.

00:07:26

Gordon Wasson was a lovely person and a great explorer,

00:07:31

and his accomplishments in the Oaxacan highlands

00:07:35

can never be gainsayed or naysayed,

00:07:40

but he was slightly overeager on this Amanita Muscaria

00:07:45

business

00:07:46

throughout the world

00:07:49

this dominator model

00:07:52

triumphed

00:07:53

the only place where it didn’t triumph

00:07:55

in our cultural

00:07:58

in the threads

00:08:00

that lead into our cultural

00:08:01

heritage was in

00:08:04

Minoan Crete and in Minoan Crete

00:08:05

and in Minoan Crete

00:08:07

the mysteries continue to be practiced

00:08:10

but over thousands of years

00:08:12

it retreated into ritual

00:08:17

and then mere symbol

00:08:19

one of the peculiar features of Minoan religion

00:08:23

is what is called pillar worship

00:08:25

the aniconic pillar that occurs in the center of every Minoan shrine

00:08:32

I believe is the aniconic image of the mushroom

00:08:37

in the same way that the Shiva lingam becomes an aniconic image of the male sexual organ the the an iconic image in

00:08:47

Minoan religion is an image of the mushroom in the late phase of Minoan

00:08:53

religion there is no question that opium was the drug of choice and in fact the

00:08:59

linear the the linear B tablets that Michael Ventress deciphered they

00:09:04

couldn’t believe their eyes

00:09:06

when they saw what the scale of the opium production

00:09:09

well if you know anything about opium and junk

00:09:13

you know it is what you take for pain

00:09:17

cultural pain, group pain, personal pain

00:09:21

the drugging of late Minoan culture

00:09:24

is I believe a response

00:09:26

to the slow death of the partnership society even at that it is from Minoan

00:09:35

religion that the mystical wellsprings of Greek religion spring the the pantheon of the Thracian Greeks they were pretty hard-headed

00:09:48

types the the mystical element in Greek religion the orthic element the

00:09:55

Dionysian element the celebration of Persephone and Demeter and all of that, those are Minoan threads

00:10:06

brought in to Greek religion.

00:10:11

And that’s the last time

00:10:13

that in our cultural line of development

00:10:16

that there was access

00:10:18

to the mystical tremendum.

00:10:24

Wasson made an interesting case

00:10:27

that what was used at Eleusis

00:10:30

was ergotized beer

00:10:31

as you know ergot is a smut

00:10:35

that can grow on domesticated grains

00:10:38

and ergotized beer would be heavy

00:10:42

with LSD-like alkaloids.

00:10:48

As I read Wasson’s work to write this book for Bantam,

00:10:53

I was frustrated.

00:10:55

Why, if you believe ergotized beer was the mystery of Eleusis,

00:11:00

why don’t you brew some ergotized beer and take it?

00:11:07

And the answer is, I think that this would be pretty scary Eleusis operated for 2,000 years every September several thousand people

00:11:17

were exposed to the mystery in an inner sanctum called the Telestereon. I find it hard to believe that you could give ergot beer

00:11:27

to a couple of thousand people once a year

00:11:30

and not have the mystery get a certain reputation for being dangerous

00:11:36

because ergot is dangerous.

00:11:39

If you, you know, in the Middle Ages

00:11:42

there were outbreaks of ergot-infected rye.

00:11:46

In fact, there was one outbreak in France in the 1100s where several thousand people died.

00:11:53

Well, now there are arguments to this and people can say, well, there must have been a strain of ergot that produced psychedelic alkaloids in great quantity and didn’t produce toxins very much.

00:12:10

Can anybody come up with a strain of claviceps?

00:12:13

This is Ergot.

00:12:14

Can anybody come up with a strain that won’t kill you if you miss the mark?

00:12:19

He talks about it, but they never got down to uh the acid test you know they never

00:12:27

brewed it up and did it now uh robert graves who was the guy who turned the watsons on to the idea

00:12:37

of going to mexico to look for mushrooms he had an entirely different idea which Wasson mysteriously fails to even mention

00:12:46

in his book on Eleusis

00:12:48

I think he should have at least

00:12:50

denounced the guy’s position

00:12:54

and showed what was wrong with it

00:12:56

what Graves argued was

00:12:58

he said at these mystery sites

00:13:00

they’re always drinking something

00:13:02

and they always publish the recipe of what they’re drinking

00:13:08

and the ingredients are always the same water rye sugar a couple of other things and he said that that this recipe was an Ogham.

00:13:26

Do you know what an Ogham is?

00:13:29

An Ogham is where you have a list and the first letter of each item in the list

00:13:33

spells a word.

00:13:35

It’s an old Irish trick.

00:13:38

It’s a mnemonic trick.

00:13:41

He said that the recipes for ergot were an Ogham.

00:13:44

And if you arranged the ingredients

00:13:48

you could always spell the greek word mykos mushrooms so he said you know all this stuff

00:13:56

about barley and all that that’s just nonsense they were eating mushrooms. Evidence is thin, but there is some evidence.

00:14:05

In A.B. Cook’s book, Zeus,

00:14:08

there’s a picture of Tryptolemius,

00:14:10

who is a figure in the Demeter mysteries,

00:14:13

holding what seems very clearly to be a mushroom.

00:14:17

Of course, the mushroom has a phallic aspect,

00:14:21

and you do get disembodied phalli,

00:14:25

both in Greek and Roman art

00:14:26

so if it’s ambiguous you can’t tell

00:14:31

is this an autonomous male member running around

00:14:36

or is this a small pointed cap mushroom

00:14:39

in any case

00:14:43

whatever was being done at Eleusis

00:14:46

that is the last contact

00:14:49

we had with the mystery

00:14:52

and by that time opium

00:14:54

was a drug that was used in the ancient world

00:14:58

we view opium as virulently addicting

00:15:02

however it wasn’t noticed

00:15:04

that opium was addicting

00:15:06

until 1600 when

00:15:08

John Playfair in a

00:15:10

book of his mentioned

00:15:12

the addiction syndrome

00:15:13

it was used for 3000 years

00:15:16

with nobody noticing that you could

00:15:18

get hooked on opium

00:15:19

so the virulence of the addiction

00:15:22

is somewhat overstated

00:15:23

I mean I myself have smoked opium many days and weeks in succession

00:15:29

and then gotten on an airplane and flown to some benighted country

00:15:34

where they didn’t have opium, and it was no problem.

00:15:37

I mean, you just forget it.

00:15:39

Addiction to natural substances, with the exception of tobacco

00:15:45

is something you really have to work at

00:15:49

but the abandonment

00:15:53

of this partnership society in Africa

00:15:55

set us up with a longing

00:15:58

an itch that we have to scratch

00:16:02

and this is why

00:16:04

we are the addictive creatures that we are why i said

00:16:09

last night we are the children of a dysfunctional relationship to the past we were literally torn

00:16:16

from the bosom of a relationship that held down pathology in our species because the ego is a pathological state,

00:16:28

extreme ego inflation.

00:16:31

Once the medication was withdrawn,

00:16:36

once the plant was no longer accessible,

00:16:40

we developed all kinds of substitutes

00:16:43

and all kinds of neurotic expressions of this situation of incompleteness that we feel in ourselves.

00:16:53

And this has gone on until the present day.

00:17:02

I can talk some about that this afternoon,

00:17:04

the way in which, for instance,

00:17:11

the fermentation of fruit juices and of honey to make mead created the alternate path of alcoholic intoxication.

00:17:17

But you see, beers and wines can never be more than 17% alcohol by volume because when a fermentation process

00:17:30

reaches 17% alcohol, the alcohol kills the organism that is doing the fermentation. So

00:17:37

unless you have a technique for distilling alcohol, you cannot make it stronger than 17% well we don’t know exactly there seem to

00:17:49

be notable exceptions to this where we don’t quite understand what’s happening for instance the Roman

00:17:56

historian Pliny describes Roman wines so strong that when they were thrown onto fires they burned this seems to indicate

00:18:08

some kind of distillation process and it has been speculated that with a simple bell-shaped

00:18:15

apparatus you could put wool in the top of it and very laboriously wring distilled alcohol out of wool

00:18:25

but the standard method of putting it into

00:18:28

a condenser to get it out was not developed

00:18:32

until an alchemist Raymond Lull

00:18:35

figured this out

00:18:37

in the 15th century or in the

00:18:40

14th century once he had figured it out

00:18:44

Lull believed that he had discovered

00:18:46

the alchemical elixir of life

00:18:48

on the basis of his invention of distilled alcohol

00:18:52

and his drinking of a large amount of it

00:18:55

he proclaimed the eminent end of the world

00:18:59

he felt that when you have dope this good

00:19:02

can Christ be far behind

00:19:04

and he urged other people uh friends of his alchemical colleagues to also experiment with

00:19:15

this at which they did very successfully and this is the basis for the cordials and the brandies and all of this stuff that we’re familiar with.

00:19:27

There is something really insidious about synthetic drugs,

00:19:34

about concentrating what is a vegetable essence and very diffuse.

00:19:43

Opium was no problem until morphine came along morphine

00:19:49

appears hardly a problem in the context of heroin heroin was invented to cure morphine

00:19:58

addiction that was the idea with it coca you know, has been used for thousands and thousands of years without a problem. Cocaine very quickly develops into a problem. The enthusiasts of cocaine in the 19th century, Freud and his school, were riding on the great wave of optimism about cocaine

00:20:25

that clustered around it when it was found to be a local anesthetic.

00:20:30

The other thing is peculiar routes of administration have been created.

00:20:38

The enema is a natural route of administration

00:20:40

that was created by Amazonian Indians thousands of years ago

00:20:45

because they had rubber

00:20:47

and they figured out that they could

00:20:50

avoid vomiting and toxicity

00:20:51

by using enemas

00:20:53

the hypodermic syringe

00:20:55

was invented in 1856

00:20:58

just a few years

00:21:00

after the invention of morphine

00:21:02

and just in time

00:21:04

for the American Civil War

00:21:07

and the Franco-Prussian War,

00:21:09

just in time to inject a lot of morphine into wounded soldiers

00:21:15

and then release them into the American and European population

00:21:19

as morphine addicts.

00:21:22

That was the beginning of that

00:21:25

it came out of the simultaneous wars

00:21:28

on two continents

00:21:30

coming into

00:21:32

the 20th century

00:21:33

amphetamines

00:21:36

were invented in the late 19th century

00:21:38

all of these synthetics

00:21:40

and they seem to

00:21:42

push our buttons

00:21:43

in a way that these natural compounds don’t do

00:21:47

and you get serious addiction syndromes

00:21:51

especially when you use these new routes of administration.

00:21:56

Well, simultaneously with all this development in pharmacology

00:22:00

coming out of German successes in molecular chemistry

00:22:04

in the 19th century,

00:22:07

a vast amount of ethnographic data is being collected.

00:22:11

The modern science of mythology and anthropology is born.

00:22:18

So in the 20th century,

00:22:21

we suddenly get a huge amount of anthropological data about strange plants

00:22:27

being used by strange people in far-off corners of the world mescaline becomes very interesting Helen and Havelock Ellis and Clouvert

00:22:47

all of these people

00:22:49

in the 30s, 40s and 50s

00:22:54

the mushroom story

00:22:55

slowly breaks

00:22:57

Albert Hoffman

00:22:59

invents LSD

00:23:01

it doesn’t really make itself

00:23:03

known in the scientific literature

00:23:05

until the late 40s.

00:23:08

A very interesting thing

00:23:10

about our particular area of interest

00:23:13

that astonished me,

00:23:15

all the talking I’ve been doing about it,

00:23:18

is the brevity of the window of research.

00:23:24

What I’m particularly interested in are the indole hallucinogens. brevity of the window of research.

00:23:27

What I’m particularly interested in are the indole hallucinogens.

00:23:30

Ibogaine is an indole hallucinogen.

00:23:33

It wasn’t known before 1850.

00:23:36

It wasn’t characterized by the turn of the century.

00:23:40

It has never had any vogue

00:23:42

as a social drug in the United States.

00:23:44

It has never been used significantly in psychotherapy.

00:23:49

No human studies have ever been done on it.

00:23:52

That’s Ibogaine.

00:23:54

LSD, the one member of the family that got a lot of attention,

00:23:58

it was not announced in the scientific literature until 1947.

00:24:04

It was not announced in the scientific literature until 1947.

00:24:12

By 1967, it was illegal to do human studies on it in the United States. That’s a 20-year window, and that was the longest window any of these things ever got.

00:24:19

Psilocybin was characterized by Hoffman in 55, I believe.

00:24:26

By 67, it was illegal.

00:24:31

DMT was discovered by the Czech chemist Zara in 56.

00:24:37

By 66, it was illegal.

00:24:40

And the amount of human studies that had been done in that time were very brief.

00:24:44

So one of the ideas that I think we have to disabuse ourselves of

00:24:49

is that science knows anything about these things.

00:24:53

The human studies were never done.

00:24:56

I was talking to somebody who was involved in all this stuff the other day

00:25:00

and they were telling me they got a protocol to study LSD they were going to have

00:25:07

a hundred subjects it was a big project set and setting was under control it was being run by

00:25:15

sensitive psychedelic people it wasn’t the white coat and clipboard set was all set to begin on Monday morning.

00:25:30

Saturday afternoon, Art Linkletter’s daughter takes LSD and drowns herself in a swimming pool.

00:25:32

By Monday morning, the LSD project was dead in the water.

00:25:37

So this thing, you may have the notion that we are a minority

00:25:44

that feels this is important and there

00:25:48

is a majority that feels that it’s unimportant that isn’t the case we are a minority who feels

00:25:55

this is important and there is a majority that knows nothing about it whatsoever, has no data and no realization of what it is.

00:26:09

An interesting case, an interesting example

00:26:11

of how science misses the boat.

00:26:14

I’ll tell this story and then I’ll let you go.

00:26:19

DMT is a very powerful short-acting hallucinogen,

00:26:23

the most powerful.

00:26:24

We’ll talk more about it in terms of its content,

00:26:27

but what I want to refer to here is

00:26:29

you smoke DMT.

00:26:33

This is how you do it.

00:26:34

This is how everybody does it.

00:26:37

Now, it can be shot,

00:26:40

but I think that’s really a barrier.

00:26:43

That’s something.

00:26:44

I don’t think you should shoot anything because I just think, you know, I think that’s really a barrier. That’s something. I don’t think you should shoot anything

00:26:46

because I just think, you know,

00:26:49

it’s a way of transmitting diseases.

00:26:52

It sets a funny psychology

00:26:54

toward the integrity of your own body.

00:26:57

And it’s just a kind of bad habit to get into.

00:27:04

Nevertheless, scientists love to inject things into people.

00:27:10

They love the injection.

00:27:12

Why do they love it?

00:27:14

Well, aside from the fact that you get to stick somebody,

00:27:17

the reason they love it is because you can absolutely control the dose.

00:27:23

You see the barrel of the syringe, you see that there’s 30

00:27:27

milligrams of X there, you watch it go into the muscle, and you write in your clipboard,

00:27:33

30 milligrams IM. What they object to about smoking is you can’t be sure that the person

00:27:39

got the whole dose, you can’t be sure that the whole dose crossed the blood-brain barrier you can’t be sure nevertheless this is how people do DMT funny thing is

00:27:51

when you shoot DMT it’s not as impressive it’s slower to come on it’s

00:28:00

slower to come away from it It lasts about 45 minutes,

00:28:06

and it’s a low hill,

00:28:12

not this mind-shattering spike of activity that drops you down.

00:28:13

So if you look up dimethyltryptamine

00:28:17

in Goodman and Gilman or the Merck Index

00:28:20

or the physician, whatever,

00:28:22

it will say short-acting hallucinogen,

00:28:27

45 minutes to one hour in duration.

00:28:31

This is not what DMT is at all.

00:28:33

DMT lasts 7 to 12 minutes

00:28:37

and is spectacular.

00:28:39

Well, finally now,

00:28:41

a project is getting started

00:28:44

to study DMT where the people will actually do it the way

00:28:49

human beings do it for the first time science will lower itself to administering a drug in the

00:28:57

manner in which it is actually used by the user in society but it’s taken 30 years to get them to understand

00:29:06

something that simple

00:29:08

so

00:29:08

what this means is

00:29:11

that people such as ourselves

00:29:14

we are

00:29:15

the cutting edge of

00:29:17

neuropsychopharmacology

00:29:19

because

00:29:20

the content

00:29:23

is the frontier,

00:29:25

and these scientist types know very little about it.

00:29:29

I mean, occasionally the most daring of them will take a trip.

00:29:35

But the great names that you associate with the psychedelic movement,

00:29:42

with certain notable exceptions,

00:29:44

are fairly cautious

00:29:46

users

00:29:47

I mean people who have their names written all over

00:29:50

this stuff when you actually

00:29:51

pin them down they say

00:29:53

well I took psilocybin four times

00:29:56

and I took

00:29:58

X and Y a few times

00:30:00

this doesn’t

00:30:01

it’s not to take it

00:30:04

and prove that you can survive it it not to take it and prove that you can survive it it’s

00:30:06

to take it and embrace it and be part of

00:30:10

it so science must stand aside unless

00:30:14

it’s willing to get its feet wet this

00:30:17

still belongs to courageous individuals

00:30:21

who are willing to put their body mind system on the line and then

00:30:27

draw conclusions from it so in trying to inspire you to do research to think

00:30:35

about ways in which whatever your specialty if you’re a medical researcher

00:30:40

and neurophysiologist a therapist therapist, a chemist, an anthropologist, a linguist, whatever you are,

00:30:47

don’t be in awe of science. Science has nothing to say here. Science is a puppy dog lagging behind

00:30:57

the train. This is an issue where the people are forcing the focus.

00:31:06

Well, I think that’s enough.

00:31:08

The time slipped by.

00:31:10

You weren’t violent enough in insisting on interrupting and asking questions.

00:31:15

We’ll go through more of this.

00:31:17

This is the basic notion that I want to put across,

00:31:21

that a disturbed symbiosis in prehistory

00:31:25

is what makes

00:31:27

the hallucinogens

00:31:28

so important in the present

00:31:31

because now,

00:31:32

knowing what we know,

00:31:34

we can restore

00:31:35

that symbiosis.

00:31:37

We can take up

00:31:38

where we left off

00:31:40

at Eleusis,

00:31:41

at Chatal Hiuyuk,

00:31:43

and at Jericho.

00:31:44

We can reclaim what has been lost since Eden

00:31:49

we’ll meet here at 4

00:31:52

thank you

00:31:54

applause

00:31:56

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:31:58

applause

00:32:01

applause

00:32:01

applause

00:32:01

applause

00:32:01

applause

00:32:01

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause

00:32:02

applause applause applause applause applause applause okay is it working for you Paul?

00:32:07

well this morning I made sort of a

00:32:11

three dimensional rational

00:32:14

argument from anthropological

00:32:18

and archaeological and pharmacological

00:32:21

data toward

00:32:23

trying to convince the listener

00:32:26

that hallucinogens were involved

00:32:31

in the origins of human consciousness,

00:32:34

that behind the abandonment of that

00:32:37

lies our neurotic relationship to nature,

00:32:41

and so forth.

00:32:43

So it was like an analysis of the phenomenon

00:32:47

of millennia of hallucinogenic drug taking

00:32:53

and then millennia of being away from it.

00:32:56

What I thought might be,

00:32:59

this is sort of the case that we have to make to our critics.

00:33:04

This is the information that has to be marshaled and argued from

00:33:08

if we are serious about a psychedelic theory of the origin of consciousness.

00:33:15

But what I thought it might be interesting to talk about this afternoon

00:33:20

is something which is, I think, dearer probably to each of us as an individual

00:33:28

which is just maybe to talk a little

00:33:32

about the actual phenomenology of these states

00:33:36

and what seems to be going on

00:33:40

there

00:33:41

in writing this book that I’ve been working on

00:33:46

I’ve seen how the image

00:33:49

of the unconscious perceived

00:33:51

through drugs has been

00:33:54

it’s like an archetype that has been

00:33:58

evolving over at least three or four

00:34:01

hundred years and the strong

00:34:04

formative influence

00:34:06

on the archetype

00:34:09

of the psychedelic

00:34:10

experience comes from

00:34:12

two directions

00:34:13

it comes from the hashish

00:34:16

vision

00:34:17

and the opium dream

00:34:20

these are the two

00:34:22

sources of pre

00:34:24

20th century psychedelic insight

00:34:27

that the western mind had access to

00:34:30

well

00:34:31

for reasons too complex to go into

00:34:35

here, hashish did not

00:34:38

have a vogue in Europe

00:34:41

the way opium did

00:34:44

it was left for Americans

00:34:46

to seriously explore hashish

00:34:50

as a vehicle for visionary hallucination,

00:34:54

specifically Bayard Taylor,

00:34:57

who in a book called

00:34:59

In the Lands of the Saracen

00:35:00

wrote a marvelous account

00:35:02

of eating hashish in Damascus in 1840

00:35:05

I mean it’s just a scream

00:35:07

and of course the irreproachable Fitzhugh Ludlow

00:35:12

who ate hashish and attended

00:35:15

Yale teas for young ladies

00:35:18

as a freshman at Yale in 1853

00:35:22

and describes having to excuse himself

00:35:25

from various faculty

00:35:27

student functions when

00:35:29

as he puts it the wallpaper began

00:35:32

to crawl and Chinese

00:35:33

mandarins burst from the umbrella

00:35:36

stand then I

00:35:37

made my departure least I

00:35:40

betray myself

00:35:41

the

00:35:43

earliest recorded instance of someone concerned about losing their cool.

00:35:51

But the stronger of these two currents of thought was the opium dream.

00:35:57

And the opium dream laudanum was tincture of opium an alcoholic extract of opium

00:36:07

and everybody was into this stuff

00:36:10

from about 1795 through

00:36:13

much of the 18th century

00:36:16

not only the great names associated

00:36:20

with it Coleridge and De Quincey

00:36:22

but Byron and Shelley

00:36:25

all of these people dabbled in opium

00:36:27

well what comes out of the English romantic imaginations

00:36:32

contact with the reveries of opium

00:36:34

is a world

00:36:37

of desolated ruins

00:36:40

and pale women

00:36:43

wailing beneath a demon moon

00:36:46

and black oceans sucking

00:36:49

at crumbling rock where mordant

00:36:52

vegetation tumbles down to

00:36:55

storm whipped shores right this is

00:36:58

the romantic imagination and it has

00:37:01

this morbid stillness

00:37:04

the stillness of Morphea

00:37:07

the stillness of the god of dreams

00:37:10

and this influences the gothic conception in literature

00:37:14

so forth and so on

00:37:15

when

00:37:18

this thing about the history

00:37:22

of how people image drugs and drug states reminds me, I will digress briefly, of a thing that happened to me that always amused me.

00:37:35

I was on an ocean liner headed for the Seychelles from India in 1969.

00:37:41

And we were furiously smoking hash, smuggling hash

00:37:46

eating hash

00:37:47

and there was a South African mercenary

00:37:50

on this boat

00:37:51

and he didn’t know anything about

00:37:53

cannabis but he was very interested

00:37:56

so he was questioning me

00:37:58

about

00:37:59

about hashish

00:38:02

and he asked this

00:38:03

wonderful question question he said

00:38:05

is it law a seance?

00:38:20

sort of

00:38:21

this question told me a great deal about him

00:38:26

and didn’t give me a lot of hope

00:38:28

that he would turn into a hardened hash head

00:38:30

so see what this is saying is that our images

00:38:34

of the transcendental realm

00:38:37

that we inherit from the past inevitably color

00:38:40

whatever manifestation of it we encounter

00:38:43

in the future so for him the transcendental realm meant table tapping

00:38:48

parties that his mother used to hold in Jayburg

00:38:52

so this prompted the question

00:38:54

is it like a seance

00:38:56

that’s right

00:38:59

so

00:39:01

coming into the 20th century

00:39:06

that was it, the hashish and the opium thing

00:39:09

well then Freud

00:39:11

and behind him Jung began to look

00:39:15

at the products of pathological fantasy

00:39:19

and the products of folklore

00:39:21

and alchemy

00:39:23

and the

00:39:25

aroused imagination

00:39:27

in its many manifestations

00:39:29

in religion and shamanism

00:39:31

and they proposed

00:39:33

then there was a widening

00:39:35

of the notion of this

00:39:37

other realm

00:39:38

and

00:39:39

as LSD was

00:39:43

developed this was what was behind, this was what was in the minds of most of the people who were dealing with LSD.

00:39:51

They saw it as a searchlight that could be turned on to illuminate the dark regions of the unconscious.

00:40:00

And I suppose if you were Freudian and you used LSD you searched for Oedipal traces

00:40:06

and all this stuff and if you were a Jungian

00:40:09

you were seeing alchemical motifs

00:40:11

and transformative motifs drawn from

00:40:14

folklore and that sort of thing

00:40:17

well this worked for LSD

00:40:21

for reasons that we maybe

00:40:24

don’t have to talk about

00:40:26

my take on it would be

00:40:28

that it has

00:40:30

LSD

00:40:32

is like a mirror

00:40:33

it’s like a perfect mirror

00:40:35

it magnifies whatever is held

00:40:38

up before it

00:40:39

but unlike

00:40:40

some of these other

00:40:43

indole hallucocenogens

00:40:45

which are demagogic

00:40:49

in their wish to convey information

00:40:52

LSD is like perfect mind, perfect mirror

00:40:57

and the mushroom is like a street corner preacher

00:41:01

who’s just haranguing you with some visionary epic.

00:41:05

So LSD was a fortuitous or a synchronistically important choice then

00:41:16

because it confirmed that Freudian and Jungian expectation

00:41:21

and they reported remarkable success with the treatment of neurosis

00:41:26

and so on

00:41:27

what then

00:41:30

came on after

00:41:32

the

00:41:32

all of these things were made illegal

00:41:36

in the 70s

00:41:38

was a

00:41:39

much larger population began

00:41:42

to be exposed to psilocybin

00:41:44

not to psilocybin the compound, but to mushrooms.

00:41:48

And it’s a very interesting point that the people who took psilocybin

00:41:55

around the Harvard psilocybin project in the 60s

00:42:01

were completely unprepared for the difference

00:42:06

between that and fresh mushrooms

00:42:09

the difference is considerable

00:42:12

and there is no rational reason from a scientific point of view

00:42:16

why this should be

00:42:17

so it’s confounding

00:42:19

psilocybin and the mushroom should be the same thing

00:42:25

otherwise you must be a mystic of some sort

00:42:29

because you’re hypothesizing that

00:42:31

there’s something better about the mushroom

00:42:34

nevertheless this seems to be experientially

00:42:37

confirmable so that the establishment picture

00:42:41

of psilocybin was flawed

00:42:44

in the literature in fact fact, the literature of

00:42:48

hallucinogenic drugs up to 1970, let’s see, all revolves around the notion that hallucinogenic

00:42:58

drugs are more or less like LSD, last half as long as LSD

00:43:05

or twice as long as LSD.

00:43:07

It’s all measured against this.

00:43:10

They were completely infatuated

00:43:12

for some reason with LSD,

00:43:14

as was the entire culture,

00:43:16

probably from the pharmacological point of view,

00:43:19

because it was active in the nanogram range,

00:43:23

in the range of millions of a gram. This is still to this day

00:43:27

astonishing that any drug should be active in the

00:43:32

nanogram range and that a hallucinogen

00:43:35

should be active for me confirms the quantum mechanical

00:43:40

connection of consciousness because so little

00:43:44

matter is in play

00:43:46

in that situation where you take 500 gamma,

00:43:52

one five thousandth of a gram.

00:43:55

It’s pretty amazing.

00:43:57

So the official version of what can happen

00:44:03

with these hallucinogens is very limited.

00:44:07

And there was never stress on content.

00:44:11

The individual content of the psychedelic trip was treated like the ravings of a psychotic.

00:44:18

In other words, it was never examined from the point of view that this person might actually be a reliable witness if

00:44:26

you read the literature of what psychedelic drugs do like if you read a book like Hoffer and Osmond’s

00:44:33

book how the synaginous classic in the field you will get the idea that what these drugs do is they cause pictures before the eyes

00:44:48

colored shapes, moving grids

00:44:51

lattices, spontaneous laughter

00:44:55

confusion

00:44:59

anxiety and hysteria

00:45:03

this is the range

00:45:05

what they’re not telling you is

00:45:08

what it feels like to be in a situation

00:45:12

where you experience spontaneous laughter

00:45:14

anxiety, little pictures and hysteria

00:45:18

all at once

00:45:19

you see

00:45:21

it’s a complete dissolving

00:45:26

of your personality

00:45:28

of the boundary constraints

00:45:30

everything

00:45:31

and so then what was offered

00:45:34

after Freud and Jung

00:45:36

by Aldous Huxley and people like that

00:45:39

to model it

00:45:40

was some kind of confirmation of eastern philosophy

00:45:44

it was embraced that way and it was

00:45:48

said that we should read meister eckhart and the upanishads particularly the manduki upanishad

00:45:55

and that we should sleep with the tibetan book of the dead at our elbow and that a lot of thought given to ego loss and the white light and this kind of thing.

00:46:08

Well, this now, to me, seems fairly superficial.

00:46:14

In a way, it spawned a whole renaissance in Far Eastern studies,

00:46:18

but those people are not very psychedelic.

00:46:22

And the people who use those metaphors

00:46:24

seem not to be present in the field anymore

00:46:27

so then in the 70s

00:46:32

I tried to launch a meme

00:46:35

based around the idea

00:46:38

that these things were extraterrestrial pheromones

00:46:42

that they were in fact

00:46:44

highly engineered

00:46:46

message units from

00:46:48

intelligent species that by some

00:46:52

strategy had penetrated this sector

00:46:55

of the space-time cosmos with a technology

00:46:58

that allowed them to essentially engineer

00:47:01

a virus-like information-bearing

00:47:05

biomechanical device which could be

00:47:09

bled into the ecology of a planet

00:47:12

and would summon out of that planet

00:47:14

intelligent organization after a million years

00:47:18

or so. And I’m still not entirely

00:47:21

uncomfortable with this idea.

00:47:24

I mean, there are reasons to wonder

00:47:26

more recently

00:47:30

a counter meme has come forward that offers

00:47:35

another possibility that is that

00:47:39

somehow the planet itself is an

00:47:43

organized infilecki

00:47:45

and that somehow we are within

00:47:48

the geocognitive field

00:47:53

of some kind of planetary mind

00:47:55

that is orchestrating history

00:47:58

well now notice what these two theories

00:48:01

have in common, the Gaian mind theory

00:48:04

and the extraterrestrial intervention theory.

00:48:08

They are theories that come forward out of a need to account for the presence in the psychedelic experience.

00:48:20

This is not something that LSD ever talked much about.

00:48:23

This is not something that LSD ever talked much about. If people were encountering aliens,

00:48:27

they were doing so in a highly idiosyncratic and non-repeatable way.

00:48:32

I don’t think the flying saucer was a serious part of the original Haight-Ashbury ethos.

00:48:42

I think the unicorn and the rainbow,

00:48:45

but the flying saucer was a later understanding.

00:48:49

It arose in the mid-70s with the mushrooms.

00:48:52

I mean, it would be interesting to trace

00:48:54

the evolution of these motifs.

00:48:56

You know, the butterfly was in there too

00:48:58

as a kind of unconscious understanding of metamorphosis.

00:49:03

But what the extraterrestrial theory and the guy in mind theory

00:49:07

are both trying to come to grips with

00:49:09

that neither the Freudian nor the Jungian

00:49:12

nor the romantic theory needed to take much account of

00:49:17

is the presence of the alien mind.

00:49:21

What is this?

00:49:24

Well, I’m not sure

00:49:26

I think this is really the question

00:49:29

for high dose Trekkies

00:49:32

to put to themselves

00:49:35

why does it have

00:49:37

why is the human mind haunted

00:49:40

this is a way to put it

00:49:42

why when we go in there are there these information bearing unbelievably peculiar familiar yet alien hyperdimensional creatures what are they you know several possibilities have been kicked around over the years are they a

00:50:11

state of human development in the far

00:50:13

flung future that is working with some

00:50:17

kind of psychotronic technology to

00:50:20

communicate with the ultra primitives of

00:50:23

the 20th century through some kind of

00:50:26

you know I mean this is possible but somewhat

00:50:29

labored I think are they

00:50:32

extraterrestrials able

00:50:35

via again some unimaginable

00:50:38

psychotronic technology to tear

00:50:41

open a mental

00:50:44

dimension in which they can communicate with us to tear open a mental dimension

00:50:45

in which they can communicate with us?

00:50:49

Well, I don’t know.

00:50:51

Are they another possibility

00:50:53

that has a certain kind of eerie charm?

00:50:58

Is that they are the grateful dead, if you will.

00:51:06

They are the dead.

00:51:08

It’s interesting how much shamanism worldwide focuses on the notion

00:51:13

that shamans come and go from the land of the dead.

00:51:17

Is there an ecology of souls in hyperspace

00:51:21

that you can perceive for four and a half minutes on DMT and then the barrier

00:51:27

between that dimension and this dimension closes over.

00:51:33

I confess this idea, maybe because it’s recent, has a certain attraction to me.

00:51:41

I know I’m warm when I have the, oh no, it couldn’t possibly be that response, which I have very strongly to this idea.

00:51:51

It’s like it boggles my mind to think that because it’s heart, heart, heart, heart, heart, heart, it doesn’t take heart to face the extraterrestrials you know

00:52:05

you become Captain James Kirk of the

00:52:07

Enterprise and you move

00:52:09

toward this diplomatic rendezvous

00:52:12

but the idea

00:52:13

that it might be

00:52:15

your dead family

00:52:17

and that in fact what you are

00:52:19

seeing is what you will become

00:52:21

and that in fact this is

00:52:24

an intimation of your personal immortality is just you will become and that in fact this is an intimation of your personal immortality

00:52:27

is just hair raising

00:52:31

and as someone pointed out

00:52:35

hair raising is the quality

00:52:39

that Robert Graves associates

00:52:41

with the near approach of Leucothea

00:52:44

Leucothea.

00:52:47

Leucothea is the white goddess. The white goddess is the goddess of death.

00:52:52

Many, many people come out of the DMT place and say, you know,

00:52:57

it feels like death.

00:53:00

There’s something about it.

00:53:02

Yes, it does.

00:53:03

It does.

00:53:04

It feels like more than death it feels I had this

00:53:09

trip recently which really alarmed me it was oh wow there was some kind of compression going on and I came out in the parlor of my grandfather’s house in a certain sunlit afternoon in 1948,

00:53:36

and I was in my child’s body, and I was facing my circus my little circus of figures

00:53:46

that I had

00:53:47

and I had little tigers in cages

00:53:50

where when you move the bars this way

00:53:53

it’s a tiger

00:53:53

when you move it this way

00:53:55

it’s a lion

00:53:56

and I had all this stuff

00:53:58

and I was there

00:53:59

and then I was there

00:54:01

and I knew

00:54:02

it was just freakish

00:54:04

beyond belief and other people

00:54:06

have said about DMT that you only have

00:54:09

one trip on it and you go to it again

00:54:12

and again and it’s a stitch in time it

00:54:16

sews it all together and you flow back

00:54:19

through these places but the feeling of not death exactly, but just

00:54:28

the skewedness of it all, what was happening to time

00:54:32

and space and mentality and association and my

00:54:36

psychic relationship to all these intervening events, I mean it felt like

00:54:40

time travel, it felt like the real thing, I would hate to have it

00:54:44

be more real than that

00:54:47

in contrast to the ordinary DMT flash where what happens is you break into this space where these things are that I’ve sort of facetiously called the tykes.

00:55:06

The tykes are these childlike, self-transforming, jeweled basketballs

00:55:13

that run around you and jump through you

00:55:18

and are like autonomous portions of the surface of your own psyche or something.

00:55:25

I mean, you can’t tell what is going on

00:55:27

except that they are offering these things

00:55:31

which are like toys or machines.

00:55:36

They’re like these Chinese ivory balls that are carved with many levels.

00:55:41

And you look at these things and the immediate emotion is

00:55:46

astonishment bordering on heart attack and then they just take it away and then they show you

00:55:53

another one and they’re showing you this stuff and trying to convey something well after having this experience a number of times

00:56:06

I came to the conclusion which again

00:56:09

was shocking to me that

00:56:12

this is somebody’s idea

00:56:14

of an environment that is reassuring

00:56:18

to human beings

00:56:20

this is the equivalent of a playpen

00:56:23

where you hang brightly colored plastic things

00:56:28

above the crib

00:56:29

so that the baby will hit at them

00:56:32

and learn hand and eye coordination

00:56:34

so that when you come through into this place

00:56:38

and there’s the elf hooray

00:56:39

which is the thing which greets you as you come through

00:56:42

there’s this yay

00:56:44

and then they have you

00:56:47

and they say okay now we have you

00:56:49

okay don’t freak out

00:56:51

don’t be amazed pay attention

00:56:52

look at this look at this

00:56:54

look at this and you’re just saying

00:56:56

you know what

00:56:58

happened a minute ago

00:57:01

I was somewhere we were talking about

00:57:03

a drug we were thinking of doing it, somebody had a match, now what is happening? And they’re saying forget about that, look at this, look at this, and they’re singing in this rhyming language which you’re in is conformational syntax

00:57:26

that is contorting itself through these fractal regressions

00:57:31

there’s no time, there’s no space

00:57:33

these things keep moving in and out of your body

00:57:36

they keep telling you they love you

00:57:38

they keep telling you to pay attention

00:57:39

to remember, to remember, to remember

00:57:43

and at that point you’re just

00:57:45

falling out of it, falling backward

00:57:48

everything melts, everything collapses

00:57:50

everything turns to slush, it falls away

00:57:53

there’s eidetic revisionism

00:57:55

and then you can’t remember

00:58:00

and you say, what happened?

00:58:04

what happened? You know,

00:58:05

what happened?

00:58:06

It’s not like being,

00:58:09

it’s like being struck by lightning.

00:58:12

It’s like what this room would be like

00:58:14

if a fighter plane came through the roof.

00:58:16

It’s that all hell breaks out

00:58:19

for like three and a half minutes

00:58:21

and you cannot make any sense whatsoever of it.

00:58:24

You cannot correlate it to a drug.

00:58:27

A drug? Are you kidding?

00:58:29

The other thing is, it hasn’t affected you.

00:58:32

You are yourself.

00:58:34

You are saying, you know,

00:58:36

holy shit, what is this?

00:58:39

You’re not blurred.

00:58:40

You don’t have all kinds of problems.

00:58:41

But what has happened is,

00:58:44

the sensory input has gone hyperspatial

00:58:48

100% just zing

00:58:51

and there you are

00:58:53

and this doesn’t fit

00:58:57

into any of these models

00:58:59

about the cheerful probing of the layers

00:59:02

of the unconscious racial or personal.

00:59:05

This is a breakthrough into some kind of parallel continuum,

00:59:10

somewhere, somehow, that is so beyond the paradigm

00:59:15

of the cheerful men in white coats who run our world

00:59:20

that it just absolutely, as I said, makes your hair stand on end.

00:59:27

This is repeatable this is not I’m not leading a flying saucer cult where we wait in cornfields with high hopes all you have to do is

00:59:36

have the guts to you know push the button and the floor you’re sitting on will disappear and you will fall through into this place how do they

00:59:46

keep the lid on this stuff this is what lies behind this cheerful historical recitation of

00:59:54

argument this morning that the human world is tangential to some kind of appalling mystery,

01:00:06

unexpected,

01:00:09

not even clear that this has anything to do with spirit and love and being good

01:00:11

or any of that.

01:00:13

It’s just some kind of weird thing

01:00:17

that our languages, our culture,

01:00:20

our religion, our perceptual biases

01:00:22

have caused us to not see

01:00:26

not see at all

01:00:27

and so then we’ve constructed a fantasy world

01:00:31

a world based on

01:00:36

empiricism

01:00:37

three dimensional linear rationalism

01:00:40

and above all a world constructed on not getting stoned. They say, you know, just

01:00:47

stay away from that. That is the edge of the world. There there be dragons. They’re right.

01:00:55

They’re right. We are no smarter than the people of 13th century Europe who feared to sail west because they knew

01:01:05

that the edge of the world lay there.

01:01:07

I mean, the edge of our world,

01:01:09

the defeat of the scientific paradigm,

01:01:12

the absolute confounding

01:01:14

of a thousand years

01:01:15

of rational philosophy and science

01:01:18

is experientially available

01:01:20

to every one of us

01:01:22

but for flimsy laws.

01:01:26

Flimsy laws.

01:01:28

Again, made by men who wear dresses.

01:01:30

Wherever there’s bad stuff being done,

01:01:33

these guys wearing dresses

01:01:34

are to be found highly active.

01:01:37

Why is this?

01:01:39

Why is this?

01:01:40

The church and the judiciary

01:01:43

are, you know,

01:01:49

in this weird lock on the evolution of the human mind. It has to do with new ideas. New ideas are bad news if you’re a control freak.

01:02:01

They spell trouble, some kind of trouble. And it doesn’t

01:02:05

even matter what kind of new ideas.

01:02:08

I mean, to the Roman Catholic

01:02:09

Church, Protestants loomed

01:02:12

like, you know,

01:02:13

a psychedelic revolution.

01:02:16

The notion that people should

01:02:17

seek in their own hearts for guidance

01:02:20

from God. What kind of

01:02:22

heresy is this?

01:02:23

This is what we have the church fathers for.

01:02:25

This is what we have ecclesiastical councils, great universities.

01:02:29

God’s ways are obscure.

01:02:32

The unaided human individual, uneducated,

01:02:35

cannot be expected to know God’s ways.

01:02:37

We will explain it to you.

01:02:40

Well, Protestantism then was the cutting edge

01:02:43

of something happening.

01:02:45

Now, a somewhat different situation prevails.

01:02:48

Each thing becomes its own antithesis.

01:02:52

Each thing kills the thing it loves.

01:02:55

So, what needs to be central in thinking about this I think is

01:03:05

how unassimilatable it is

01:03:08

how very very different it is to be stoned on DMT

01:03:12

than it is to be sitting here in a room full of people

01:03:15

talking about it

01:03:16

that it’s different, lots different

01:03:20

there’s nothing else in our spectrum

01:03:24

of potential experiences

01:03:27

that can come close to it

01:03:29

well now DMT is interesting

01:03:32

it occurs in the human brain

01:03:35

naturally every single one of us

01:03:39

is holding, the law has not yet dealt

01:03:42

with this, but the fact of the matter is that we are elaborating DMT in our brains.

01:03:49

Why? We don’t know.

01:03:51

What does it mean that the most powerful of all hallucinogens occurs naturally in the human brain?

01:04:01

What does it mean that the most powerful of all natural hallucinogens is the shortest acting

01:04:08

because you see the speed of recovery is a measure of the toxicity of a drug a drug or a compound or

01:04:18

a plant that you can feel 24 hours or 48 hours later is toxic that’s what that feeling is if you have to you

01:04:28

know lie around the day after a trip this is because there was a toxic trailing toxic edge

01:04:36

to whatever you did DMT you are returned to the baseline of consciousness within 7 to 20 minutes, unfailingly.

01:04:47

Well, this means then that the human brain is completely set up to degrade, depotentiate, deanimate, dealkalate this compound and shunt it into harmless byproducts like indolecetic acid.

01:05:09

It means that the brain is familiar with this,

01:05:14

has many pathways to deal with it and can degrade it quickly.

01:05:19

So that’s an argument for safety.

01:05:23

Well, this is beginning to work us into a corner.

01:05:26

Here’s what we’re having to face,

01:05:28

that the strongest hallucinogen

01:05:30

is the shortest-acting hallucinogen,

01:05:34

is the safest hallucinogen,

01:05:36

and is the most natural of all hallucinogens.

01:05:43

The reasons for not doing it

01:05:45

are just disappearing right and left

01:05:48

and yet it remains an absolutely

01:05:51

taboo aspect

01:05:54

of even the psychedelic culture

01:05:56

because it succeeds

01:06:00

where all else fails

01:06:02

and it raises questions that are not psychological that are not philosophical

01:06:09

it it seems to imply that our entire model of the world is not slightly flawed but absolute

01:06:21

baloney that we are living in a dream.

01:06:26

We are living in some kind of one-dimensional surface

01:06:29

of some hyper-dimensional object

01:06:32

and questions like,

01:06:34

is there life after death?

01:06:36

Are there extraterrestrial intelligences in the universe?

01:06:40

What is the meaning of human history?

01:06:42

Who am I?

01:06:43

All of this is a product of lower dimensional

01:06:48

language unable to conceive

01:06:52

of this object

01:06:54

which we are now in a position to explore

01:06:57

this is some kind of thing

01:07:00

which we are discovering

01:07:03

it’s so large a discovery

01:07:06

that it takes a century or so

01:07:09

to even figure out what this is

01:07:12

I mean while we’re dredging the Bermuda Triangle

01:07:16

for flying saucers

01:07:17

while we’re training our radio telescopes

01:07:21

on Zeta Reticuli

01:07:22

while we’re doing all this stuff

01:07:25

looking for the message

01:07:27

the message is exactly where you would expect to find it

01:07:31

present in the human mind as

01:07:34

the transmission of some kind

01:07:37

of entity

01:07:40

for which the laws of physics

01:07:43

and the confines of matter

01:07:45

mean nothing

01:07:46

and life and death seem to be

01:07:51

nothing

01:07:52

two or three centuries ago this would have just simply been called

01:07:56

God Almighty

01:07:57

I don’t know

01:08:00

I don’t think that it is the God

01:08:03

that hung the stars like lamps in heaven

01:08:07

that is a very large God

01:08:10

the stars are vast

01:08:12

but something is going on on this planet

01:08:16

around the issue of biology

01:08:18

something has broken through here

01:08:21

some kind of higher order organizational process is in play that is larger

01:08:28

than the human species, larger than the historical damage we have done to the planet. Something is

01:08:36

going on. And I think that we are reaching the cultural stage where if we can sufficiently decondition we can understand

01:08:45

what it is

01:08:47

it’s something about

01:08:49

the biological

01:08:52

integrity of the planet

01:08:54

and cognition

01:08:56

and ourselves

01:08:58

as instruments

01:08:59

of something that wants to

01:09:02

manifest itself

01:09:03

through the release of energy

01:09:06

and the control of matter in some form.

01:09:10

I mean, it’s not clear whether we are preparing

01:09:12

to build spacecraft the size of Manhattan

01:09:16

that are going to go off to the stars

01:09:19

and win an empire along the Milky Way,

01:09:23

and that is our destiny,

01:09:24

or whether we can go inward

01:09:26

and place our entire world in a single grain of sand

01:09:31

and leave that grain of sand on an Indonesian beach somewhere

01:09:35

and just retreat from the planet

01:09:38

into some other dimension that we will create.

01:09:42

Perhaps we can build a module

01:09:45

and bury it on the moon

01:09:47

and then radio transmit ourselves

01:09:50

into its interstices

01:09:51

and live in a simulacrum of a real world

01:09:55

forever as a penance for what we did to the planet

01:09:59

I mean the scenarios are endless

01:10:03

because the cultural dimension that opens ahead of us is the imagination.

01:10:10

That’s what all this stuff is.

01:10:13

That’s where all these things are living.

01:10:18

It’s something that we have only a taste of.

01:10:22

In terms of imagination, we are living in a one-dimensional world, but the curve,

01:10:29

the curve of imagination’s ingression into the world of human culture could take a sudden

01:10:37

asymptotic. You’re listening to The Psychedelic Salon, where people are changing their lives one thought at a time.

01:10:48

And so once again, the tape ends, leaving us with another little cliffhanger.

01:10:54

But this time I feel more confident that the next tape will pick right up where this one left off.

01:10:59

As you may know, while this podcast is my current offering from The Psychedelic Salon,

01:11:05

and it will be podcast on the original channel three months from now,

01:11:09

but in the meantime, each week I’ve been playing the introduction to these podcasts,

01:11:13

along with a few sound bites from the program.

01:11:16

Well, for the past 15 minutes of this talk we just listened to,

01:11:20

I’ve been ready to select a few more of Terrence’s rousing words for the sample,

01:11:25

but well, each phrase seemed to lead into yet a better one. But then he ran out and I missed my

01:11:32

chance. So I guess I’ve got all the samples I’m going to have for this week. And by the way,

01:11:37

that book by Bayard Taylor, The Lands of the Saracen, is available for free at Project Gutenberg.

01:11:44

The Lands of the Saracen, is available for free at Project Gutenberg.

01:11:51

And I’ve put the link directly to it in today’s program notes, which you can find at psychedelicsalon.com.

01:11:54

You know, when I heard Terrence mention that early in his talk,

01:11:59

well, it sounded something like, well, it’d be fun for me to read here at the end of today’s podcast,

01:12:03

that little story about him doing hashish in Damascus.

01:12:08

But after I downloaded the book and searched for the word hashish,

01:12:13

I discovered that Taylor devotes an entire chapter to this experience,

01:12:18

and actually in some ways it’s also reminiscent of Ludlow’s Tales,

01:12:19

which were published a few years earlier.

01:12:22

And for what it’s worth,

01:12:27

if you are interested in stories about drug trips that went a little off the tracks

01:12:27

well my supporters on Patreon recently read

01:12:30

a story that I posted

01:12:32

well it was about a time that I spent an evening

01:12:34

at Disney World totally ripped on

01:12:37

acid

01:12:37

and this is a warning to our younger fellow saloners

01:12:41

please don’t be as stupid as

01:12:43

I was when I was young

01:12:44

back when I was still in my 50s. Well, I guess I better get out of here before I

01:12:50

reveal even more things that would be best if my grandchildren never found out.

01:12:55

So, for now, this is Lorenzo signing off from Cyberdelic Space. Be well, my friends.