Program Notes

Guest speaker: Sasha Shulgin

SashaShulgin01.jpg

This is Sasha Shulgin at his best … talking about some of the most beautiful molecules on Earth. Recorded at the Mind States conference in Jamaica in 2002, this is classic Sasha.

“The revolution is in the ditch until you get your chemistry together.”   ---Terence McKenna

Previous Episode

021 - Psychedelic Psychotherapy and the Shadow

Next Episode

023 - Mind States IV (2003) Sound Bites

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

Greetings from cyberdelic space.

00:00:20

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:24

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:32

Well, today’s program is a talk that Sasha Shulkin gave at the Jamaica Mind States Conference in 2002.

00:00:38

I’d like to think that everyone who hears this podcast already knows a lot about Sasha.

00:00:48

But if you don’t, then you owe it to yourself to go to Arrowhead or Wikipedia or just anywhere on the net and look him up.

00:00:51

In my humble opinion, he’s the world’s greatest chemist.

00:00:55

And in a perfect world, he’d already have his Nobel Prize.

00:00:59

What do I base that over-the-top statement on, you ask?

00:01:06

Just pick up a copy of P. Call and T. Call, two books that he and his wife Anne wrote,

00:01:11

and check out the chemical stories that make up the second half of each book.

00:01:19

There you’re not only going to find a listing of well over 200 phenethylamines and tryptamines that he synthesized, most of which I believe had never been built before Sasha did it,

00:01:24

synthesized, most of which I believe had never been built before Sasha did it.

00:01:29

But synthesizing these compounds wasn’t the first step,

00:01:32

nor was it even the most important step, I don’t think.

00:01:38

The first step was in figuring out which ones might be psychoactive and which ones weren’t, and how he does that is part of the talk that I think you’re going to enjoy hearing just in a few minutes.

00:02:09

Thank you. Sasha’s talks more as performance art pieces than lectures. If you go to our podcast page at matrixmasters.com,

00:02:13

then you’ll find Sasha’s name in the listing for our Program 22,

00:02:15

the psychedelic salon.

00:02:16

That’s the one you’re listening to right now.

00:02:18

Click on Sasha’s name, and you’ll be taken to a page where I posted a picture that I took of Sasha

00:02:23

while he was giving one of

00:02:25

his talks back in the late 90s.

00:02:27

I think you’ll get a little idea of how animated he can get when he really gets into his topic.

00:02:35

In fact, in the recording you’re about to hear, Sasha was talking so fast at one point

00:02:41

that Ann had to ask him to slow down a bit.

00:02:45

And he did, for about two minutes or so.

00:02:49

Since

00:02:49

I’m not a chemistry whiz

00:02:52

myself, whenever Sasha

00:02:54

gets on one of his roles about

00:02:56

moving this atom to that ring

00:02:57

and then flipping it over or something like that,

00:03:00

I just pretend I’m listening

00:03:02

to the world’s greatest auctioneer.

00:03:04

Only I know he’s not selling anything.

00:03:06

He’s just waxing poetic about some of my favorite chemicals.

00:03:11

You know, it’s too bad we don’t have a video of this performance.

00:03:14

In fact, there wasn’t even a professional recording service there at the time.

00:03:19

Fortunately for us, Kevin Whitesides was there,

00:03:22

and he had the presence of mind to turn on his tape recorder.

00:03:26

So without any further ado, here is Sasha Shulgin talking about natural versus synthetic psychedelic compounds.

00:03:41

So what I want to talk about today is the synthetic side of things.

00:03:47

I didn’t seem to know, there’s a very good friend of mine, now dead, named Terence McKenna.

00:03:55

He was giving a lecture one time at Esalen.

00:03:59

Remember that, Annie, remember that Esalen lecture McLean about 15 years ago?

00:04:05

10 years ago?

00:04:07

He was giving this long talk

00:04:09

about the beauties of ayahuasca,

00:04:11

the beauties of DMT,

00:04:13

and all these natural psychedelics.

00:04:16

And not very

00:04:17

deeply disguised under his

00:04:19

discussion was the fact

00:04:21

if it ain’t natural, it probably

00:04:23

ain’t safe’s not good.

00:04:26

Which, he wouldn’t say it quite

00:04:28

that way if he knew there was a prejudice

00:04:29

sneaking in there about natural as opposed to

00:04:32

as opposed to synthetic.

00:04:33

And he’s commenting about these very excellent natural

00:04:35

materials, and he got ready to go

00:04:38

a little bit more about many

00:04:39

other synthetics than

00:04:40

the audience saw me.

00:04:44

And he didn’t want to take me quickly tear down my little world of synthesis because

00:04:48

he’s a different person who appreciates it, but his theme of that talk was natural versus

00:04:53

synthetic. And so I did a little snooping around. I think Jonathan was one of the first

00:04:58

ones to come up with the actual numbers. DMT, dimethylcryptamine, which I’ll get into, not get into in that sense, but get into in the lecture a little later in the hour,

00:05:09

is a good example of the conflict here because it was first synthesized by Mastia up in Canada,

00:05:17

roughly 1932, 1933, 1935, somewhere there.

00:05:20

And it was discovered as a component of a South American plant about 20 years later.

00:05:26

By, uh,

00:05:26

the second reporter

00:05:29

was the research director at Bristol for a while.

00:05:31

That’s how I learned about that.

00:05:33

But this is 20 years. It was a synthetic

00:05:35

compound. And then it was discovered in nature.

00:05:38

So for 20 years, from his

00:05:39

philosophy, it’s something that is not a good

00:05:41

chemical, not a good drug.

00:05:43

But once it was found in a tree somewhere in South America,

00:05:46

or bush,

00:05:47

it’s okay.

00:05:49

And there are about four or five drugs

00:05:52

that are synthetic that have been found in nature.

00:05:55

So the idea of keeping…

00:05:57

I question things that are naturally safer.

00:06:00

Because people have used them…

00:06:01

People have used strychnine for hundreds,

00:06:03

thousands of years.

00:06:04

It doesn’t make it safe. So you have to hold that kind of a restriction in abeyance.

00:06:08

But anyway, I want to talk about the synthetics that have come out of studying the natural materials.

00:06:15

The first material I ever got into, about 1950-something or other, with synthetic mesclun.

00:06:26

It was a beautiful,

00:06:27

I loved the appearance,

00:06:28

a beautiful white crystal in salt.

00:06:29

It was the bisulfate salt.

00:06:32

Long white needles.

00:06:35

And I took, I think,

00:06:36

350 or 375 milligrams,

00:06:39

forget it,

00:06:40

350, 375.

00:06:43

I was with three,

00:06:44

four babysitters,

00:06:45

and there were about four of us who were in the experiment,

00:06:48

just enough to get into a car.

00:06:49

One of the babysitters was a driver, I might have shown you.

00:06:51

That’s a good thing to keep in mind.

00:06:53

Don’t try driving a car under a vessel in a cemetery.

00:06:55

You know that.

00:06:57

Anyway, it was an interesting experience.

00:06:58

Once I got over the initial nausea,

00:07:00

and the nausea was not that really bad.

00:07:03

I had forgotten I had eaten not that much before, but I was reminded of what I

00:07:07

had eaten when I looked at my vomit.

00:07:09

And there it all was.

00:07:10

I think it had chewed up peas and some carrots, and nods and is like that.

00:07:13

And the first thing that caught my attention when I was in a strange place is I really

00:07:17

enjoyed looking at my vomit.

00:07:20

Now here’s out in the field on the grass.

00:07:22

And here’s, this is part of me.

00:07:23

It came out of me.

00:07:24

It was in essence identified with it. What in the field, on the grass, and here’s, this is part of me, it came out of me. It was an essence, I identified with it.

00:07:26

What in the world is going on?

00:07:28

My first psychedelic experience.

00:07:30

And that developed from there into strange, strange, fascinating areas.

00:07:34

One, we were way up at the top of the hills behind Berkeley,

00:07:37

and one of my first close encounters with a thing in nature that I had not really ever tangled with before,

00:07:42

was a bee.

00:07:44

And I watched this

00:07:45

bee, it came up to a flower, and the bee kind of entered this blossom, and the bee saw me

00:07:51

and ignored me. I watched the bee, I watched the blossom, looked at the interaction, and

00:07:55

that bee was taking stuff out of this flower and putting it in something like a little

00:08:00

sack down its leg on one side. It it didn’t blossom again and got some more

00:08:05

and put it in the sack

00:08:05

on the other side.

00:08:06

I don’t know how long

00:08:06

this went on.

00:08:07

It may have been

00:08:08

25 minutes.

00:08:09

I was watching that bee

00:08:10

throw itself away.

00:08:12

The bee, again,

00:08:13

was aware of me

00:08:13

and had the grace

00:08:14

of ignoring me totally.

00:08:16

And I watched this whole thing

00:08:17

and it was all gone.

00:08:18

The bee went away.

00:08:18

I took the flower.

00:08:19

It’s a little part

00:08:19

of the story later on.

00:08:21

But all kinds of things

00:08:22

alongside the road

00:08:24

up there

00:08:24

where we parked was gravel.

00:08:26

There was a pavement, the gravel was on the side, the gravel was in different colored

00:08:30

stones. And I could not get out of the car on the passenger side because I saw that as

00:08:35

the back of a crocodile or something nasty. And if I stepped on the back of that animal,

00:08:41

I might not be safe. So I had to get out of the other side of the car. Visual colors, I saw colors that were totally alien to me. I used to think

00:08:48

I knew the dedication of colors. The colors that were not, look at a plain piece of color,

00:08:53

and the outer edges were affected by the color of the thing that was next to it. You know,

00:08:57

there would be green, but when there’s red over here, the green became kind of purplish

00:09:01

to reflect the red, and the red became sort of different colors to reflect the green.

00:09:05

And I saw the colors were not a single thing.

00:09:07

They were a continuous continuum of change, fascinating.

00:09:12

At the end of the experience,

00:09:13

in fact, I lived in Berkeley at that time,

00:09:15

I went down there,

00:09:16

and the flower I put in a little vase on the coffee table in front of the thing,

00:09:20

and I smelled it.

00:09:21

It was a gorgeous smell.

00:09:22

I was intrigued by the inside of that flower,

00:09:26

and I looked down inside. I couldn’t even touch the pebbles.

00:09:29

I mean, it was a little boozy, the carypallid.

00:09:32

This is what they call it.

00:09:33

In the center of it, and I looked inside.

00:09:35

I could barely, I tried to move the pebbles apart,

00:09:38

but I couldn’t do it.

00:09:40

Caught my attention, the reason I mentioned the flower

00:09:42

is my next, first real synthetic experiment was with a material which I had extended the chain one carbon to go from a phenethylamine, which is over here with a two carbon chain.

00:09:52

This is, by the way, takes the place of slides, takes the place of projection things.

00:09:57

This is the dream.

00:10:13

Anyway, I was going to use a blackboard for drawing dirty pictures, and we compromised, and I draw a sylapine here, and a trypone here, and I’ll point to them as we go so I don’t have to use a blackboard and let that be it.

00:10:20

I said, if this compound is this dramatic, and then I stopped and thought for a while.

00:10:22

The compound wasn’t doing anything.

00:10:25

It was I who was doing everything. I was seeing the color. The compound was not the white. It was I who was doing everything.

00:10:26

I was seeing the colors.

00:10:28

The compound was not just white.

00:10:29

There was no color there at all.

00:10:31

I went into meditation and went deep thoughts

00:10:32

and heard some early childhood things

00:10:34

in which I had found

00:10:35

some pretty colored flowers

00:10:36

out behind the house,

00:10:37

another house in Berkeley

00:10:38

where I lived.

00:10:39

And I can remember that

00:10:40

with great clarity

00:10:41

being out underneath the honeysuckle

00:10:43

and watching up and watching out

00:10:44

and no one could see me because I was inside under the fence with

00:10:48

a honeysuckle all around me.

00:10:50

And I remember that with great clarity.

00:10:52

And I began to say, where in the molecule that happens to have three methoxy groups

00:10:57

over here and two carbon chains is the memory of honeysuckle?

00:11:00

Where is the knowledge of colors?

00:11:02

Where is all this memory?

00:11:03

Where is the ability to watch a bee

00:11:05

with a complete immunity

00:11:07

do its honey-sauce,

00:11:09

do its flower thing?

00:11:11

I said, what it is,

00:11:12

this is not a drug that’s doing anything,

00:11:15

providing me information,

00:11:17

doing anything for me.

00:11:18

It is allowing me to get into myself.

00:11:21

So in essence,

00:11:21

it is not a chemical drug,

00:11:24

but it’s a catalyst that allows me internally

00:11:27

to find things. By luck, I may find things I want. I don’t know what they’re going to

00:11:31

be, but I was totally fascinated. This was back in the 50s. And that completely changed

00:11:36

the direction of my entire life research. I had some knack of chemistry, and I was quite

00:11:41

interested in things that were psychoactive. I delved around in the library for this but never really gotten the psychedelics before and that was my very first introduction

00:11:49

and so class was obvious you have three you have three four five prime epoxy over here to work

00:11:53

where you want epoxy is two carbon chain and the mean group on this end and that’s the simplicity

00:11:58

of the molecule not a very potent thing it took a few hundred milligrams to do the job

00:12:02

but uh the job was fascinating because the job was it from me, not to me, but out of me.

00:12:09

So I said, well, by golly, what can you do there?

00:12:11

So I said, well, there’s an output position there.

00:12:13

I put a methyl group on there.

00:12:16

This is where chemistry on a blackboard is such fun.

00:12:19

And people say, well, it’s easy on a blackboard.

00:12:21

When you go to the laboratory, then you can’t just go

00:12:23

and take a little nail and a hammer

00:12:25

and take a methyl group

00:12:26

and quack a methyl group

00:12:26

on the side of the chain.

00:12:28

I mean,

00:12:29

you don’t do that

00:12:30

quite that way.

00:12:31

On a blackboard,

00:12:32

if all chemistry

00:12:32

was blackboard

00:12:33

with erasers and chalk

00:12:34

it would be simple.

00:12:35

You could make any molecule

00:12:36

in about 20 seconds.

00:12:37

But the truth is

00:12:38

making molecules

00:12:39

to jive with structure

00:12:40

is not that much more difficult.

00:12:42

You have to think

00:12:42

from a different point of view

00:12:43

but it’s all there.

00:12:45

So I moved to the laboratory,

00:12:46

and I made the methyl group down in that position,

00:12:48

which is the amphetamine chain, carbon, carbon, carbon,

00:12:50

and down

00:12:50

at the mean group, the amphetamine.

00:12:54

And to make that, I used nitrothane,

00:12:56

and I had to have a little nitrothane,

00:12:57

so I coupled the corresponding trimethoxybenzaldehyde.

00:12:59

Now don’t worry about this, it’s all in the book somewhere.

00:13:02

Trimethoxybenzaldehyde with nitrothane,

00:13:03

and there was the corresponding amphetamine. Trimethoxin is not a hydrogen nitrate. They were used in sodium and lithium. I’d like to know if there was, of course,

00:13:06

monounfetamine.

00:13:08

Climatoxin and amphetamine,

00:13:09

that’s called TMH in the heart.

00:13:10

So I looked into the chemical literature.

00:13:12

It had been synthesized by a group of people

00:13:15

in Canada about three years earlier.

00:13:18

And they had said it had an interesting property.

00:13:21

If you’re watching a,

00:13:22

what’s the wheel that rolls around

00:13:24

and gives you color?

00:13:25

Kaleidoscope. Kaleidoscope. Good. You watch a kaleidoscope, and it generates colors. The colors

00:13:31

are more intense if you take this compound first. Well, I didn’t think anyone would play with a

00:13:35

kaleidoscope, but I appreciated the fact they had colors. And so I made the compound. If you go

00:13:41

and gather twice what they use, you get into a psychedelic place. Now, there’s not merely a mescalite,

00:13:46

but a different thing. But meanwhile,

00:13:48

while I was preparing that compound,

00:13:50

I said, well, nitrothane, nitrophene, nitrothene,

00:13:52

I got all the nitroalkane I had

00:13:54

into one carbon, and it makes

00:13:56

this inward, different thing.

00:13:57

It’s at two, it’s at three, it’s at four, it’s at five.

00:14:00

So it’s this size of iodine compounds,

00:14:02

all with different size chains hanging down there.

00:14:05

And by the time I had gotten the others made out here, the first one I had evaluated,

00:14:10

it was about twice as active in potency as mesclun, but totally different in its action.

00:14:15

It was not the friendly closeness of mesclun. It was almost too aggressive, almost as if you had a portrait.

00:14:20

It revealed in me, not the compound who’s doing it, It’s meat, what is being revealed from meat by the compound. And again, the fair and all, I’m going to mention the flour at some length of mesclun is I had a very similar flour on the coffee table in Berkeley with this. And I was curious about the snow and what’s inside, and I tore it apart. Tore it apart to look inside. Completely damaged, destroyed the flour. But it was completely, I mean, obviously, this is my thing, I want to look, I did it. So I tore it apart to look inside. Completely destroyed the flower.

00:14:45

But it was completed in energy. I mean, obviously this is my thing. I did it.

00:14:49

So I thought for a while, I said, why is one actually so precious that you can’t destroy any part of nature,

00:14:55

and the other you can just tear it apart because you’re curious?

00:14:58

Anyway, I made the third compound of the chain of eight or ten of them.

00:15:02

Not active at all.

00:15:04

And it’s a heck of a rest of them.

00:15:05

What else can we do in this molecule?

00:15:07

That really got me started.

00:15:08

If you can change an atom in a molecule,

00:15:10

you can keep a kind of a psychoactive aspect of it.

00:15:14

Change all the atoms.

00:15:15

Go look around.

00:15:15

Try this, try that.

00:15:16

Move it over here.

00:15:17

So I looked at this one.

00:15:18

And I think I have it written over here.

00:15:20

3, 4, 5.

00:15:22

Mess them with 3, 4, 5-tribothopsy.

00:15:26

You dangle the thing

00:15:27

by the ring, the aromatic ring

00:15:29

on my right, over this way,

00:15:32

and have those methoxys

00:15:33

down there. There are six

00:15:35

ways you can have three methoxys in the ring.

00:15:37

You have 2-3-4, 2-3-5,

00:15:40

2-3-6, 2-4-5,

00:15:42

2-4-6,

00:15:44

and one other I’ve forgotten. 2-3-6, that one., 5, 2, 4, 6, and one other I’ve forgotten.

00:15:45

2, 3, 6, that one.

00:15:47

One is all consumed,

00:15:48

because the one is where hands are.

00:15:50

I’m holding this little thing

00:15:51

off the Christmas tree by the dingler,

00:15:53

and I’m holding a number of clips

00:15:55

on the hexagon to attach things to.

00:15:57

So I made all six of them.

00:15:59

So I have TMA2, TMA3, TMA4, TMA5, TMA6.

00:16:02

And, of course, in diligence,

00:16:04

and a bit of inattentiveness,

00:16:06

assayed them all in about the same way,

00:16:09

ran them all down.

00:16:10

And the first one I hit was the TMA2,

00:16:12

the one with the lymphocytes in the 2, 4, 5 physicians

00:16:16

as the amphetamine, alpha-methyl down there.

00:16:19

And that caught me off guard

00:16:21

because I happened at that point to be

00:16:23

an employed chemist at Dow in Roman Creek in Pittsburgh.

00:16:28

And I went in. I was not feeling very comfortable.

00:16:31

And I went into a closet where they kept the things that they came to Florida with.

00:16:35

But no one who worked there would go in there, because that’s a janitor’s place.

00:16:39

No janitors during the day, so I felt fairly not discoverable in there.

00:16:43

And I found myself going into a very, I thought, I had

00:16:45

very carefully moved myself one small

00:16:47

increment up with activity.

00:16:49

Some activity, maybe 12, I went to 20.

00:16:52

And 20 came on very

00:16:54

heavy and very fast, and I was into a whole

00:16:55

new territory that was totally scary.

00:16:58

And so I was

00:16:59

against that for a while, so I tried it

00:17:01

more carefully later on, and it’s

00:17:03

about 10 times as potent as this great increase in potency, and a lot of visuals. But a kind of thing that

00:17:12

didn’t reveal a part of me that I cared that much about. But that’s okay. Right then I

00:17:17

was still counting potency rather than quality. Actually, both are very valid majors of activity.

00:17:25

And so,

00:17:27

the TMA-3 was a 2-4-5,

00:17:29

2-2-3-4,

00:17:29

TMA-4

00:17:30

was a 2-3-5,

00:17:31

2-2-3-5

00:17:32

was a 2-3-6.

00:17:33

And the other one,

00:17:34

the final one,

00:17:34

where they’re

00:17:35

the opposite thing,

00:17:36

the 2-4-6

00:17:37

was also potent.

00:17:39

And comparable

00:17:40

to TMA-2.

00:17:40

So TMA-2

00:17:41

and TMA-6

00:17:42

were the two

00:17:42

in there

00:17:43

that I found

00:17:44

to be interesting

00:17:44

and active

00:17:45

and worth pursuing.

00:17:46

The whole area

00:17:47

from that point on,

00:17:48

this is the

00:17:49

epilamine world,

00:17:51

what I did,

00:17:52

I took that basic structure

00:17:54

and began mucking around with it.

00:17:55

But the TMA6 structure

00:17:57

allows fully

00:17:58

a comparable degree

00:17:59

of exploration

00:17:59

and I’ve never explored it.

00:18:01

So if anyone really

00:18:02

wants to go into chemistry

00:18:03

and get the whole area,

00:18:04

start with the 246 instead of a 245

00:18:06

and duplicate everything.

00:18:08

You’re going to find fascinating compounds

00:18:09

and fascinating things.

00:18:11

Different to make.

00:18:12

Some are more difficult.

00:18:13

Some are easier.

00:18:13

I just haven’t gotten around to that.

00:18:15

That’s kind of the thing.

00:18:16

I mean, you start bossing out

00:18:17

and take this path, that path, that path,

00:18:19

and you go past thousands of paths

00:18:21

that go up from your path.

00:18:22

You’re gone.

00:18:23

None of them have been explored.

00:18:24

Oh, who knows what’s

00:18:25

out that way? You don’t know. It’s like going down the corridor

00:18:27

with 55 doors. You go through the door, there’s another

00:18:29

corridor with 55 doors.

00:18:31

What are the other doors in this corridor that you

00:18:33

don’t know? There’s something out there

00:18:35

that’s interesting. If you had 55 lives,

00:18:37

you’d find it out. But at the end, you

00:18:39

pursue the one that happens to catch your fancy

00:18:41

at the moment. And that’s where I went. So,

00:18:44

you have the methoxys out there.

00:18:46

Well, methoxy,

00:18:48

two methoxys make two oxygens,

00:18:50

and two oxygens are methane dioxide.

00:18:52

So, if you take that same molecule,

00:18:54

2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

00:18:55

did I write the 6 on there? I think I did.

00:18:57

Yeah, down here.

00:18:59

If you had to bridge two adjacent spots

00:19:02

with the methane dioxide,

00:19:03

the two oxygens tied together by carbon,

00:19:06

and then put methoxy on something that’s left,

00:19:09

you have six possibilities.

00:19:11

So I call this MMDA, methanoxy, methamphetamine,

00:19:15

methoxyamphetamine.

00:19:16

And there are six that are possible.

00:19:18

And I made the five that were obvious.

00:19:21

The six I had no way of figuring out how to make.

00:19:23

I tried a variety of things.

00:19:24

Never succeeded. I’m amused because they made the methamdoxy, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:30

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:34

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:35

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:36

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:37

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:38

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:39

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam,

00:19:40

methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamphetam, methamph all positional isomers are also included under this definition. So although I can make five,

00:19:46

they only reported one, but the

00:19:48

total of six are instead of one.

00:19:50

And I’m a little bit amused. I checked

00:19:52

this before I came down here because I want to be sure I’m up to date.

00:19:55

I looked up in Chem Abstracts

00:19:56

for the six of them. No one’s ever

00:19:58

made it. It’s never been made.

00:20:00

It’s twice in the literature, reported in the literature,

00:20:02

but both because I wrote it as an interesting

00:20:04

compound that’s never been made in a review article.

00:20:06

So it’s in the literature because I said it was interesting but it never had been made.

00:20:09

When it came out, I’m sorry, it never had been made.

00:20:11

But the person who first succeeded in making that has committed a felony.

00:20:16

Because it was just scheduled.

00:20:18

Well, it was named as such, right in the law, even though it’s never been made.

00:20:22

These are humorous parts of the law.

00:20:24

They’re a lot of luxury.

00:20:27

Anyway, so six of those,

00:20:30

made five of them, and the only ones that interested me were the mesengokshi

00:20:31

in the three-four position. So my attention

00:20:34

is being sucked out to that three-four position.

00:20:36

As it turns out, I’m not going to go

00:20:37

into the full detail. Let’s go through all the

00:20:40

growth steps that went on. It takes probably

00:20:41

four or five hours. If you want to take

00:20:43

time, you need to eat dinner tonight

00:20:45

but anyway

00:20:46

I made a whole lot

00:20:47

of those

00:20:48

I began looking

00:20:49

around different

00:20:50

different ways

00:20:50

different combinations

00:20:51

of things

00:20:52

the next

00:20:54

general direction

00:20:55

I went is

00:20:55

I settled on

00:20:56

the 2,4,5

00:20:57

which is 2-methoxy

00:20:58

4,5-methylenoxy

00:21:00

or 2,4,5-privothoxy

00:21:01

and I made

00:21:02

H-methoxy

00:21:03

into an S-methoxy

00:21:04

and methoxy

00:21:04

is a methyl but an oxygen S-methoxy is 2-carbon and primethoxy. And I made H’s of methoxy into an F-doxy. And methoxy is a vessel group of methoxy.

00:21:05

F-doxy is two carbons on a lot.

00:21:08

So, in essence, if you have

00:21:09

2, 4, 5 primethoxy,

00:21:11

you can have 2 F-doxy, 4, 5

00:21:13

dimethoxy, 4 ethoxy,

00:21:15

2, 5 dimethoxy,

00:21:17

5 ethoxy, 2, 4 dimethoxy,

00:21:20

2, 4 diethoxy,

00:21:21

4 ethoxy, 2, 5

00:21:23

diethoxy, 4 ethoxy, or 4, 5 diethoxy,-ethoxy-4-methoxy, 2-5-di-ethoxy-4-methoxy, or 4-5-di-ethoxy-2-methoxy, or 10-methoxy,

00:21:30

the tri-ethoxy.

00:21:31

So I made them all.

00:21:33

And I’m sure in the lab, having done, you might as well go ahead and make them all,

00:21:36

which I did.

00:21:37

The only one that showed interesting activity was the 4-ethoxy.

00:21:41

So this is a little bell of mine.

00:21:43

Something about that 4 position has got a little bit of sparkle to it.

00:21:46

And there’s a point where nature,

00:21:49

I guess I’m natural,

00:21:50

so I’m doing natural things.

00:21:52

So this is the point at which I’m going to begin

00:21:54

if I get mutations going on

00:21:56

or changes in the way I do things.

00:21:57

This is where I’m going to focus a little bit.

00:21:59

So I did.

00:22:00

I made this 2-4-5 try methoxy.

00:22:03

I said, if the four position is so fancy,

00:22:06

here’s a situation where you can’t lose.

00:22:09

If you were to take and take that methoxy,

00:22:11

I knew the methoxy came off

00:22:12

because I can’t keep collecting urines

00:22:14

and running analyses

00:22:15

and the methoxy disappears.

00:22:16

I’d like to know what happens to it in me

00:22:18

because sometimes you get into things

00:22:20

in which the compound doesn’t do something.

00:22:22

The compound goes into you

00:22:23

and it’s changed to something

00:22:24

and what it’s changed to is what does things to you.

00:22:27

So sometimes the metabolites are the things that are the active ones to pursue.

00:22:30

This is a whole other chapter of this talk, which I won’t get into.

00:22:34

Anyway, so I may say to myself, if the form of the thought group is the active thing,

00:22:39

and it kind of comes off easily, let’s say,

00:22:40

and it becomes a phenol and it conjugates with some nucleotide gas,

00:22:43

and something gets treated in urine,

00:22:45

let’s put something on that group that can’t come off easily, let’s say, and it becomes a phenol and it conjugates with some nucleotide gas and something gets treated in urine, let’s put something on that group that can’t come

00:22:47

off easily. So I said, why not

00:22:49

instead of a methox, you put a methyl on there?

00:22:52

Now, methyl can’t hydrolyze

00:22:53

all. It can oxidize to an acid,

00:22:55

it can do all kinds of things, but it cannot

00:22:57

hydrolyze all. We love

00:22:59

sort of an animal. So, I put

00:23:01

a methyl group in there and I said, you’ve got a case

00:23:03

here to win if the compound turns out to, like the receptor site somewhere in the brain that’s superior to these things,

00:23:10

go and plug in, do things.

00:23:12

If it likes that receptor site, it’s going to go to that receptor site.

00:23:15

It’s going to go into the receptor site.

00:23:17

And one of two things.

00:23:18

Either it is going to be an active psychedelic,

00:23:21

and it’s going to be an MCA because it can’t hydrolyze into something that’s inactive.

00:23:25

So it might be a very open thing.

00:23:27

Or it might go in

00:23:29

and be inactive.

00:23:30

And if it’s inactive,

00:23:32

but it goes to the receptor cycle,

00:23:33

the psychedelic drug cycle,

00:23:35

and it’s inactive,

00:23:36

if there’s something

00:23:37

in the person

00:23:38

that makes the person want to,

00:23:39

well, that’s the wrong term.

00:23:40

It’s good to see you.

00:23:41

And second,

00:23:42

excuse me,

00:23:43

I use the word

00:23:45

skitsy.

00:23:47

I have been frequently asked

00:23:51

to speak more slowly.

00:23:55

And I will do my best to

00:23:57

lead to that request.

00:23:59

It’s good for about 40 seconds.

00:24:05

I’ll try.

00:24:06

If it were to go into the receptor site

00:24:08

and block the receptor site

00:24:10

from some indigenous factor in there

00:24:12

that makes a person schizophrenic,

00:24:14

you have a cure for memory illness.

00:24:16

You can’t lose.

00:24:17

It’s either going to be a potent psychedelic

00:24:19

or a good deal.

00:24:22

For people who are a little bit schizophrenic

00:24:25

not schizophrenic

00:24:26

oh I said

00:24:27

gave a

00:24:27

a

00:24:28

grand rounds of Harvard

00:24:30

I used the word

00:24:30

schizophrenic

00:24:31

for a psychiatrist

00:24:32

it was not a graceful thing to do

00:24:33

and I got

00:24:34

chewed up

00:24:35

after

00:24:35

schizophrenic

00:24:36

is the word I did

00:24:37

I’m sorry

00:24:37

talk about

00:24:39

people who are

00:24:40

there are

00:24:41

this is an aside

00:24:43

an aside

00:24:44

I don’t have a time

00:24:45

that’s a boy, that’s a compliment

00:24:48

we had

00:24:51

at Donner Labs

00:24:53

about 20, 25 years ago

00:24:55

an opportunity to work with schizophrenic patients

00:24:58

from Mendocino County

00:24:59

when they had a whole lot of mental hospital

00:25:01

the mental hospital

00:25:03

okay

00:25:04

and so I made some Oh, I was in the mental hospital. In the mental hospital. Okay.

00:25:07

And so I made some esogenesis methionine, which is a kind of neat

00:25:09

derivative of methionine, because what they

00:25:11

thought at the time, methionine is what provokes

00:25:13

mental illness in people who are

00:25:15

with it in their diet and have the proclivity

00:25:17

toward mental illness. It made it more

00:25:19

extreme, but those who did not have that proclivity

00:25:22

did not have that response to it.

00:25:24

They were using methionine as sort of a titan for potential schizophrenic illness. And I happened to have

00:25:30

some radioactive sulfur knocking around, so I made radioactive sulfur. So you put it in

00:25:35

there and measure the distribution of it in the brain. You put it in here, you put people

00:25:40

in a concert, and you see them walk with the camera, and you put them in there, and we

00:25:44

had these five-inch normals.

00:25:46

A little tricky to find them in Norris Lab, but we found them.

00:25:49

And five different things were simple.

00:25:50

We’d get up and then see the hospital and line them all up,

00:25:53

and we gave each of them a separate day, separate circumstances,

00:25:56

enough radioactive eccedency and refining to see it in the brain.

00:26:00

And we ended up with ten photographs.

00:26:02

We put them on the wall of the North Slab up on the hill.

00:26:07

And there are pictures of the brain with this radioactive thing in there, and every one was different.

00:26:12

Every one was different. Some had bright here, some bright there, some blind, some hid, what have you.

00:26:18

And every time someone comes through from the National Institute of Health, coming in from the East Coast, in brain chemistry and what have you. Here it is. Ten brain scans. That’s the difference in the finding.

00:26:27

Five of them are normals and five of them are schizophrenics. Which are the normals?

00:26:31

Oh, we’ve got to be kept tallies. Random, random, random. I mean, no one can pick up

00:26:36

which one is abnormal because they’re all different. And then about

00:26:39

three months later, one of the schizophrenic patients came in and

00:26:43

Tony, my ally there, who can talk to schizophrenics

00:26:46

with great ease, they just sort of

00:26:47

trusted him for some beautiful reason.

00:26:50

And he was in there

00:26:51

and the schizophrenic came in,

00:26:53

and I said, those are the pictures you took of us.

00:26:55

Well, one of each of you. Oh, that’s

00:26:58

me.

00:26:59

And he pointed at this photograph, and he said, he’s absolutely

00:27:01

right. He picked his

00:27:03

picture out of ten pictures that was of his head under his stent.iamine. So he says, how’d you know? Simple, simple. See the little star shaped thing down the little right hand corner?

00:27:05

The little thing that looks like a star there?

00:27:06

I see it all the time.

00:27:07

So there are a lot of things about brain chemistry we don’t understand yet.

00:27:08

But that’s the kind of thing you keep running into.

00:27:09

Things that are apparently not true.

00:27:10

So, I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:11

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:12

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:13

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:14

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:15

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:16

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:17

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:18

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:19

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:20

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:21

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:22

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:23

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint.

00:27:24

I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint. I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint. I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint. I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint. I’m going to give you a little bit of a hint. So there are a lot of things about brain chemistry we don’t understand yet.

00:27:25

But that’s the kind of thing you keep running into.

00:27:28

Things that are apparent and obvious to someone, and suddenly you, with all your sophistication and road, can’t see through it at all.

00:27:35

And that’s why I love the theory of chemistry, because all of a sudden you make a compound that should be a wild psychedelic, and you end up convulsing it.

00:27:41

Or you make a compound that should be totally inactive and it’s active or vice versa.

00:27:46

And every time you add a little bit more knowledge

00:27:46

of what’s in the structure,

00:27:48

what goes to making it active,

00:27:49

you think you’re getting

00:27:50

a little closer to the target,

00:27:51

you’re just very hoping

00:27:52

new doors in new ways.

00:27:54

It’s actually a fascinating

00:27:55

pursuit.

00:27:55

Anyway, back to the,

00:27:57

that was a red flag,

00:27:58

I wrote it right down there.

00:28:00

Back to the argument

00:28:01

of making synthetics.

00:28:02

So I made this compound

00:28:03

with a metal group

00:28:04

at that position, which if it came off

00:28:06

we obviously

00:28:07

it couldn’t come off. If it blocked the receptor

00:28:10

site and the receptor site

00:28:12

was triggered by an endogenous psychotogen

00:28:14

then you have indeed had a treatment for

00:28:16

illness due to internal

00:28:18

psychotomy.

00:28:20

And if it is active

00:28:22

you got a new portal. It turned out it was very active.

00:28:26

And in fact the activity

00:28:26

left up by a factor

00:28:27

of about

00:28:28

four or five

00:28:29

or anything

00:28:29

I’ve made before.

00:28:31

I called it

00:28:31

desoxy

00:28:32

because I took

00:28:32

the oxygen away

00:28:33

to put the

00:28:33

muscle in the body

00:28:34

called desoxymethyl

00:28:35

and it had

00:28:37

the slang name

00:28:37

of VOM

00:28:38

which became

00:28:39

quite popular

00:28:40

about the 1960s

00:28:41

under San Francisco.

00:28:43

In fact,

00:28:43

that was quite a chapter

00:28:44

in San Francisco.

00:28:44

At that time I was in medical school.

00:28:46

I remember wandering down through the

00:28:47

hay to actually be memorizing the circles of books

00:28:49

so I could get the quiz that afternoon.

00:28:52

And all around me people were stoned on the

00:28:53

stuff, D-O-M, but they called it S-T-P.

00:28:57

And

00:28:57

that was originally, it was, I think,

00:28:59

a racing car oil or something.

00:29:01

But they had it as

00:29:03

serenity, tranquility, and placidity. But no one on as Serenity, Tranquility, and Placidity.

00:29:06

But no one on Stone could pronounce

00:29:08

Placidity, and so it came out

00:29:09

Serenity, Tranquility, and Peace.

00:29:12

And the

00:29:13

called it Too Stupid to Puke.

00:29:15

And they called it Stop the Police.

00:29:17

There was a lot of slang about that thing.

00:29:19

But it was put in tablets and sold

00:29:21

as an LSD substitute.

00:29:23

The difficulty is, the tablets

00:29:25

were 20 milligram tablets.

00:29:27

The actual dose is 5 milligrams.

00:29:29

Who had the inspiration of making 20 milligram tablets?

00:29:32

I don’t know. And it takes a while

00:29:33

to come on. Some of these, some of these

00:29:35

quite slow in onset.

00:29:37

And people would take one, but they’d come on,

00:29:39

they’d take another one. They’re turning

00:29:41

into the hate actuary clinic with 40 milligrams

00:29:43

of the stuff on board, not knowing what it was chemically.

00:29:46

They knew I was kind of in the area.

00:29:48

They asked me if I knew it.

00:29:49

I said, if you had never heard of SCP in my life,

00:29:51

because it was initials I had never heard of.

00:29:53

And it was about three or four months

00:29:55

before that, putting the manufacturer over

00:29:57

and making them cut down the level

00:29:58

10 to the final five milligrams.

00:30:01

That kind of got a very negative reputation.

00:30:06

And indeed, at those levels, it did slowly come on. It’s a long trip. But from my point of view, I had already discovered

00:30:10

activity, turned over a friend of mine at Johns Hopkins, who was doing work there in

00:30:17

the area of psychedelics, and he wanted the ethoxia, the ethyl, and I gave the ethyl

00:30:20

for them. They said, you can put lovely things on there, the dopamine. I said, try anything.

00:30:25

So I stuck on

00:30:25

iodine,

00:30:26

I stuck on bromine,

00:30:27

I stuck on thiol,

00:30:28

methyl thiol,

00:30:29

all kinds of other groups

00:30:30

in that minus four position.

00:30:33

And when it hurts,

00:30:33

I put on the bromine.

00:30:35

So if this is DOB,

00:30:36

that’s DOB.

00:30:37

If this is DOM,

00:30:37

this is DOB.

00:30:39

So I made DOB.

00:30:40

That was quite

00:30:40

an interesting chapter.

00:30:42

After two or three milligrams,

00:30:44

you take it,

00:30:44

you’ll really begin turning off

00:30:45

for about four or five, six hours.

00:30:47

You’re into it for the night.

00:30:48

You sleep through the night.

00:30:49

Next day, you’re still stoned.

00:30:50

You are really in for a 36-hour prayer.

00:30:52

It’s quite a time-consuming thing.

00:30:56

So we did this up on the hill

00:30:59

at the Lawrence Lab.

00:31:01

We made the material

00:31:02

probably just down at Donner,

00:31:10

down at the Berkeley campus. We had access to all the instruments in the world. Because before there were any such things as psychedelic drugs, before there were any such things as illicit vibratories.

00:31:14

And we worked at the Lawrence Lab down there, Lawrence Lab up there. Psycho-tron, we could run a psycho-tron. We had keys to the psycho-tron,

00:31:21

we had keys to the gamma counters, we had keys to everything.. Because we go in at night and do whatever we want.

00:31:25

The objectionality, the other appreciation.

00:31:27

As long as we publish,

00:31:29

anything we can do, anything we want.

00:31:30

So we made that with bromine DOB.

00:31:35

Bromine 77 and bromine 82.

00:31:37

I think we used both of the gamma-emitting isotopes.

00:31:40

The bromine 77 is the only one that works with more.

00:31:42

And what we did, we said,

00:31:43

if this thing is,

00:31:44

let’s see what it does to the body.

00:31:46

So we made a nice sterile solution and injected it into the VSC about a fraction of a milligram

00:31:51

because we didn’t want to get that stone.

00:31:52

We just wanted to see where it goes to the body.

00:31:54

We lay on this gamma band scanner, and it moves with you lying on it across this way

00:31:59

with a bunch of gamma detectors underneath here.

00:32:01

And as you go across with the gamma detectors, that’s if they were scanning up the body.

00:32:05

Except it can’t be the way you go hit first.

00:32:07

And over here is a great big monitor

00:32:09

in which it lines and shows what the gamma thing is seeing.

00:32:12

And you see it out by the body.

00:32:13

Here’s the head, here’s the hands,

00:32:14

here’s the body, here’s the hips, here’s the legs.

00:32:16

So you don’t have to scan too fast.

00:32:18

And here are the legs.

00:32:21

So you scan this thing slowly

00:32:22

and you can get time-lapse photography of where it’s going

00:32:26

through you by taking this picture, then this picture again, this picture again, as a film,

00:32:30

and show it as time-lapse photography. Beautiful. So we saw this thing going into the body,

00:32:35

get a little vestibule, not really going to get an intravenous injection, got a little thing in

00:32:38

the tissue up here, it’s a little spot up in here. You can see the bladder slowly going to the sides

00:32:42

of the legs, the sides of the arms, the and sides of the brain, because urine is collecting it and urine has to be radioactive, so the bladder shows up to be radioactive.

00:32:50

And we want to see how much goes to the brain. Almost none.

00:32:53

Holy moly, we looked at this more carefully over the period of time,

00:32:57

and very little is going to the brain, mostly going to the lung.

00:33:01

And so we go a little longer, and then the lung level begins to go up, and then the brain

00:33:06

level starts going up. So apparently the stuff is snagged in the lung. The lung is about

00:33:11

the second most potent metabolizing organ in the body. And there is metabolizer, something

00:33:16

that carries radioactive isotope with it. The bromine goes with it. But it’s not the

00:33:19

starting material. It’s a different material. And then the lung goes down, the brain goes

00:33:24

up, the person gets turned on,

00:33:26

goes sparkle, sparkle, and it takes many hours for it to really drop completely down out of the brain.

00:33:31

So here we’re seeing something in which the active component is not what we thought it was,

00:33:35

it’s something the body generates from what we gave to the body. No idea what it is. No one’s

00:33:40

ever pursued it. We’ve published those things, no one’s given a damn. No one’s ever looked at it. But it’s interesting, DOB, a brain-along-limb thing, is extremely along-limb because of

00:33:47

a metabolic change, and we looked at the urine, and we never did find out what the radioactive

00:33:56

bromine is attached to.

00:33:57

These are little fun things you do on the side.

00:33:59

Meanwhile, you can make your own bromine.

00:34:01

We know how to turn the cyclotron on.

00:34:03

I’ll switch over here. Focus a little bit.

00:34:05

Make your eyes open.

00:34:06

That’s marvelous.

00:34:07

Those are marvelous things.

00:34:08

No longer do they have such liberty, I’m afraid.

00:34:11

They now want to know what you’re going to do and to whom and why.

00:34:14

At that time, you can do anything you want.

00:34:15

For any reason you want it, anyone you want.

00:34:17

It’s an absolute marvel.

00:34:20

Anyway, so that’s what happened.

00:34:22

They put bromine, put iodine on, DOI.

00:34:24

In fact, that’s an interesting

00:34:25

cut

00:34:25

DOI is equally

00:34:26

potent

00:34:27

long live

00:34:28

to a couple

00:34:28

milligrams

00:34:29

is all you

00:34:29

want to ever

00:34:30

handle

00:34:30

with DOI

00:34:31

and interestingly

00:34:32

enough

00:34:33

there’s a

00:34:33

company

00:34:33

in the

00:34:34

east coast

00:34:34

in the

00:34:35

Boston area

00:34:35

that makes

00:34:36

isotope

00:34:37

labeled

00:34:38

or unlabeled

00:34:39

materials

00:34:39

for neurological

00:34:40

testing

00:34:40

they have

00:34:40

agonists

00:34:41

various

00:34:41

neurotransmitters

00:34:42

here and there

00:34:43

and they have

00:34:44

both DOB and

00:34:45

DOI. They offer DOB, required a DEA, BND, 222 form, and all kinds of communication because

00:34:53

it has to be a scheduled one drug. But they never scheduled DOI. Equal tone, equally powerful,

00:34:59

equally long-lived. And they sell it there without any restrictions whatsoever. But once

00:35:03

they found it psychedelic, the price went up by a fold, and the business had selling agonists for New York president.

00:35:10

So it’s there, but if anyone really has an academic license, they want to get turned

00:35:14

on a DOI to buy samples from commercial sources, no problem. Anyway, so this is all going on.

00:35:20

I’m sure I haven’t gotten around to it. I’ll get to it on my topic pretty soon, which is

00:35:23

new cryptomanias, but you have to be patient.

00:35:25

I’m sold, I still have 25 minutes.

00:35:28

I’m sold, I still have 25 minutes.

00:35:30

Yeah.

00:35:31

Pretty soon.

00:35:33

Okay.

00:35:33

Why don’t you wiggle your hands

00:35:35

and I’m gonna make sure I’m fine.

00:35:36

Okay.

00:35:38

So, if all this is going on,

00:35:39

what about this monomer two-party?

00:35:41

That’s all with the methyl group

00:35:42

hanging down in that alpha position.

00:35:44

Take the methyl group off, you’re back to the methyl amines again. So I went back to the methyl group hanging down in that alpha position. Take the methyl group off.

00:35:45

You’re back to phenethylamines again.

00:35:46

So I went back to phenethylamines.

00:35:48

I found the bromocon count, the iodine count, the sulfur count, the alkyl sulfur count.

00:35:53

All these things are fascinating as amphetamines.

00:35:59

And I knew to be less potent as phenethylamines, but what about them?

00:36:02

So I synthesized all those things.

00:36:04

And one of them that really caught my fancy

00:36:06

was the bromine counter compound.

00:36:07

It’s called 2Cb, because 2Cb,

00:36:10

because it only had two carbons,

00:36:11

I went from three back to two.

00:36:12

And then I named the thing on the fourth position,

00:36:14

which is down here somewhere,

00:36:16

as what’s on there.

00:36:17

So 2Cb is a bromine in that position,

00:36:18

all of the two five-diamethoxy.

00:36:21

Iodine has an ion in there.

00:36:22

2Cb is illegal.

00:36:24

2Ci is not. Just keep that in mind. It is

00:36:28

of comparable activity. Some people prefer to the bromo, some people prefer the bromo

00:36:32

to the iodine, but I make it a 50-50. So keep in the back of mind 2C-I is a fat thing. The

00:36:37

sulfur composition led to what I call 2C-T, T for thiol, 2C 3, 4, 7 just became scheduled.

00:36:45

Oh, that’s quite something.

00:36:51

2CT7, which has been a notorious thing in a lot of publications recently,

00:36:56

was just made as of roughly the first of the last month a Schedule I drug,

00:36:59

and he’s proposed for scheduling that uses the power of being scheduled.

00:37:02

And as well, an interesting little twist in that they have actually cited, because no one’s ever published the chemistry,

00:37:05

they had no choice but citing PC P. Cowell as the method of synthesis.

00:37:08

It’s quite fun to be interesting in the Federal Register to find a book I wrote

00:37:11

being a synthesis citation for a new schedule of drugs.

00:37:15

That’s the way it goes.

00:37:17

So for that position, Alkohol’s acquisition, 2C-M is the methyl compound.

00:37:21

Not interesting.

00:37:22

It’s been used as a, more or less,

00:37:28

almost like a placebo extender of other things.

00:37:30

2C-E, the ethyl compound,

00:37:32

the methyl compound is active,

00:37:33

the mule begins dropping off.

00:37:36

These are whole areas that I thought would be fascinating,

00:37:36

explored a lot of them,

00:37:39

but then I caught up in the world of cryptomates.

00:37:42

And as you can go any thousands of doors in the hallways of the thymephylmines,

00:37:47

that you basically go get in that hallway, thymephylmines are all the way over here,

00:37:50

the tryptamines is in the thousands of doors and every door leads to other doors.

00:37:54

And so I got off in this tryptamine area.

00:37:56

In the tryptamines there are several that are natural, maybe five, six.

00:37:59

You have DMT, dimethyl tryptamine, and here we have the tryptamine.

00:38:02

And I have a chain out here with the nitrogen,

00:38:05

so the NN dyes are alkyl groups of the nitrogen over here,

00:38:09

and the four and the five positions are the only places on the cryptamine ring

00:38:13

where substitution things, oh, right here.

00:38:16

Right here.

00:38:17

I have, here.

00:38:21

I’ll have these, I’ll get around to these in about seven minutes, eight minutes, whatever.

00:38:30

The natural ones, DMT,

00:38:32

dimethylcytamine,

00:38:34

in the second book that Dan and I wrote,

00:38:37

I have a chapter entitled

00:38:38

DMT is everywhere, and believe me,

00:38:39

it is grasses, it’s leaves,

00:38:42

it’s in every dark field.

00:38:43

The sun is beautifully white and stupid. It’s in you dark thing under the sun. It’s beautifully white and stupid.

00:38:45

It’s in you.

00:38:47

It’s in your spinal column.

00:38:48

It’s in your brain fluids.

00:38:50

And so I’m really amused when they have DMT as being Schedule 1

00:38:54

and anything that contains it means that everyone in this room

00:38:58

is containing a scheduled drug

00:39:00

and is subject to the corresponding punishment

00:39:02

of having a fellow who has spent 20 years in prison

00:39:04

if they choose not to like you for it.

00:39:07

These are in you. These are in your brain system.

00:39:10

These are natural. That’s one reason I think the DMT, you can smoke a joint at the DMT,

00:39:15

get over it, whatever you think, smoke another joint, have another trip, get over it,

00:39:18

smoke another joint, have another trip.

00:39:19

You don’t exhaust yourself because it’s a natural compound in you.

00:39:23

And your body has a way of handling and taking care of it.

00:39:27

So one of the major ones there is a diethylstymethylcryptamine,

00:39:30

N-endymethyl on this end, with nothing on the 4 or 5 position.

00:39:34

The other one is the 4 position, you put an oxygen,

00:39:38

you have then the 4-hydroxy-N-endymethylcryptamine,

00:39:43

commonly named the silicin,

00:39:45

which is one of the two words

00:39:46

that the DEA consistently misspells.

00:39:49

In summary, he spelled it with a C-Y-N

00:39:52

at the end of C-I-N.

00:39:53

But they always spell marijuana with an H.

00:39:55

Have you ever seen federal publications on marijuana?

00:39:58

Always an H instead of a J.

00:39:59

Why? I don’t know.

00:40:01

The whole thing about marijuana in the DEA,

00:40:03

I’ve not even thought about marijuana today, but I’ve already started, so I’m going to talk about marijuana in just that little

00:40:07

bit. It’s a fascinating thing. The old, old, old crowd in the DEA, who used to be in the

00:40:13

Bureau of Narcotics, called BNDB, which used to be the Bureau of Narcotics, BM, and back

00:40:19

in that time when they made marijuana a, what those would say, a scheduled drug, they made marijuana a, what’s the saying, a scheduled drug. They made it a narcotic by definition in 1936 approximately.

00:40:29

There were only two narcotics.

00:40:30

Basically, there were varieties of it.

00:40:32

Two nuclear narcotics, and that was cocaine and opium.

00:40:36

And heroin or morphine and opium.

00:40:39

And when they, what was his name, Ansfiger,

00:40:41

was the guy who made his career on getting the Bureau of Narcotics,

00:40:46

famous and well-known,

00:40:48

put it in there

00:40:49

and it was, of course,

00:40:49

classified as a narcotic.

00:40:50

So legally,

00:40:52

marijuana is a narcotic

00:40:53

in old federal law,

00:40:55

which is fascinating.

00:40:56

And there are people,

00:40:58

the old crowd

00:40:59

still looks upon

00:41:00

marijuana as a narcotic

00:41:02

because that’s what it was

00:41:03

when they came into

00:41:03

the thing in the 30s

00:41:04

and it’s still there. And so the term, this is sort of an narcotic, because that’s what it was when they came into the thing in the 30s, and it’s still there.

00:41:06

And so the term, this is sort of an inside joke,

00:41:09

but you’re welcome to share it if you want.

00:41:10

In the DEA, people who still believe that marijuana is a narcotic

00:41:15

are called Jurassic narcs.

00:41:18

They’re not yet a prior crowd of people who have this as part of their vocabulary.

00:41:24

But that’s all been changed, as Jonathan mentioned, a great deal from that,

00:41:28

combined to what was in the BDAC, the Bureau of Drug Abuse Control, which is run by the FDA.

00:41:34

The FDA ran the drug control system.

00:41:38

There’s the Department of Agriculture, of course.

00:41:40

But the Bureau of Narcotics is run by the Department of Treasury.

00:41:43

Nothing to do with health, nothing to do with justice, but Treasury and Agriculture.

00:41:47

Then they’re combined in the BNDE Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs,

00:41:51

which went from roughly 1968 to about 1973.

00:41:57

And then that was dissolved and became the Bureau of Drug Enforcement,

00:42:01

DEA Drug Enforcement Administration.

00:42:04

Anyway, bouncing on a little bit more.

00:42:06

More hydroxy group over on the cryptamine 4 position.

00:42:10

Isosin, the phosphate ester, and psilocybin,

00:42:13

the two major active components of the mushrooms,

00:42:15

which I’m sure some of you have already experimented with from across the street.

00:42:22

Psilocybin is the name of the phosphate ester.

00:42:24

I’ve also wondered, and curiously,

00:42:26

if it’s active by itself,

00:42:27

or does it have to split down to silicin to be active?

00:42:30

The question was answered about a year ago

00:42:32

by some Swiss pharmacologists and physicians

00:42:35

who gave psilocybin to some innocent people

00:42:38

and found that the blood level of silicin

00:42:40

appeared almost immediately.

00:42:42

So psilocybin is converted to psilocybin in vivo

00:42:45

as a metabolite.

00:42:47

And then, of course, there’s

00:42:48

the sub-derivative,

00:42:52

the semilantiate,

00:42:53

what do you call it,

00:42:55

the beocysteine in the psilocybin,

00:42:57

beocysteine is the one

00:42:59

that has the phosphate group

00:43:01

of the four-position oxygen,

00:43:03

but only one methyl group on the amine.

00:43:06

There’s norbea cysteine.

00:43:07

Its activity has never been established in man.

00:43:09

The cysteine is active in man,

00:43:11

but norbea cysteine,

00:43:12

which has a phosphate group on the four position,

00:43:14

phosphate oxides on the four position,

00:43:16

and no methyl groups on the nitrogen

00:43:18

have not been established in man.

00:43:20

We don’t know about it.

00:43:21

I had a good friend, Paul,

00:43:23

who’s a chemistry professor at Ann Arbor,

00:43:26

who had done the first isolation of both

00:43:28

beta cysteine and norbeta cysteine

00:43:30

from celosotomy beta cystis.

00:43:32

And I asked him, I would like to run TLC on these

00:43:36

if you have reference standards.

00:43:37

Said I need just 100 micrograms, though,

00:43:39

I would need of each of them.

00:43:40

So I’d set up a TLC thing and assay different mushrooms

00:43:43

with a composition of these and said, you know,

00:43:45

by the way, do you know if it’s active or not?

00:43:48

He said, I don’t know, but I had some graduate students

00:43:50

working around there, they may

00:43:52

have suspected one thing or another.

00:43:54

So he went to get a few

00:43:56

hundred micrograms as a

00:43:58

record sample for me. The vials had

00:44:00

totally disappeared. They were gone.

00:44:02

He came back with the knowledge that I

00:44:04

don’t have any of the samples left.

00:44:06

I suspect the graduate students

00:44:07

have found the thing.

00:44:09

They may be able to tell you

00:44:10

if they’re actually there.

00:44:12

But I have to move it later.

00:44:13

At this point,

00:44:14

no one knows about

00:44:14

the activity of neurovex.

00:44:15

Justine, I do not know.

00:44:17

I’ve never tried it.

00:44:17

And I can’t get

00:44:18

reference samples from Vigil.

00:44:20

There it is.

00:44:21

On the five position over here,

00:44:23

another natural one

00:44:24

is the 5-hydroxy,

00:44:25

not 4-hydroxy,

00:44:27

4-hydroxy is the sonosin.

00:44:30

The 5-hydroxy is,

00:44:32

and with the diabetical group on this end,

00:44:34

is known as the botany,

00:44:36

and it has a fair amount of notoriety.

00:44:37

It’s going to do one drug.

00:44:39

I have for a long time assumed

00:44:40

that the botany was not an active compound.

00:44:43

The only human studies were done

00:44:44

in these marvelous narcotic hospitals,

00:44:48

whatever Jonathan called them.

00:44:50

They’re prisons and you’ve got to lock people up and then give them drugs.

00:44:53

Narcotics.

00:44:55

Prisoner narcotic prison type hospital experimental places.

00:44:59

Really wild.

00:45:00

They put people in there.

00:45:02

They say, we’d like to try this compound and we’ll try the botany. Do you mind?

00:45:06

Show it to the gate. And you line them up

00:45:08

and you inject the botany and you find

00:45:10

people. And they say, well,

00:45:11

what do you want to see? We want to know

00:45:14

if you see colors. Okay.

00:45:16

And they load them up with 16

00:45:18

milligrams each intravenously and they sure

00:45:19

saw colors. And if they report

00:45:22

well, they know what’s needed to be seen.

00:45:24

They kind of report in that direction

00:45:25

because as a thank you for having put

00:45:28

themselves into that jeopardy

00:45:30

position for the day, they’re giving

00:45:32

a pass to the pharmacy and they can get any

00:45:34

drug they want. And so

00:45:35

they’re in there presumably treated for drug

00:45:38

addiction, and truth is they have access

00:45:39

to the pharmacy by being experimental subjects

00:45:42

for any drugs they happen to want anyway.

00:45:44

The pharmacy kept heroin on hand

00:45:46

and had a heavy flow of that.

00:45:47

This is all kind of planning.

00:45:49

The hospitals don’t exist anymore,

00:45:50

but for a while

00:45:51

they were notorious

00:45:52

as being one of the major

00:45:53

academic sources of information

00:45:55

in the area of acupuncture.

00:45:57

So that is where the botany

00:45:59

was first studied

00:46:00

by Hydroxy-NN-Dymepo.

00:46:03

And they got sort of a colored viewing.

00:46:07

The face had turned a little bit orange,

00:46:08

but you have some of this flesh,

00:46:09

these are called serotonin flesh,

00:46:11

you get these things from other things.

00:46:13

And I was really skeptical of the materials,

00:46:15

maybe not active.

00:46:17

Then a paper would appear from Australia

00:46:19

that said, oh yes, it’s active.

00:46:20

We found by intervening this administration,

00:46:22

so and so, so much, gave very strong action.

00:46:24

Then a paper appeared from Norway saying that that amount of people had no action at all.

00:46:29

It was balanced 50-50 of active, not active. The whole thing was that way.

00:46:33

A good friend of mine got it out of a pre-Emerald. What was the South American pre-Emerald?

00:46:43

Sibyl?

00:46:44

Sibyl. Yes it Sibyl Sibyl

00:46:45

Cumbria

00:46:47

Sibyl

00:46:47

this is

00:46:48

Donna

00:46:48

and not Donna

00:46:49

but

00:46:49

Manolo

00:46:51

and

00:46:51

Brecky

00:46:52

and they

00:46:53

took scenes

00:46:54

of this

00:46:54

and they

00:46:54

ground up

00:46:55

the scenes

00:46:55

painted them

00:46:56

up a little

00:46:56

bit

00:46:56

because they

00:46:57

find

00:46:57

these

00:46:57

mummy

00:46:58

things

00:46:59

they mummies

00:47:00

it down

00:47:00

there

00:47:01

high levels

00:47:02

that have

00:47:02

been intact

00:47:03

for years

00:47:04

and they

00:47:04

find mummies these little snuff crates where they use the snuff.

00:47:09

And they’re assaying the snuff crates for residues of plants,

00:47:12

those snuffs are made out of.

00:47:14

And these are, what, a thousand years old maybe?

00:47:16

1,200.

00:47:17

1,200 years old.

00:47:18

And in plants, residues are in there intact.

00:47:21

And you can tell the quality of the snuff by the quality of the

00:47:25

clothes without the money. The higher class, better clothes, different snuff. So he began

00:47:29

making a sociological study of what classes used what kinds of snuff. And when they’re

00:47:34

coming up was this, uh, had an answerer. And they made a, they seed thing, grouted up,

00:47:39

heaved a little bit, stored it, I never did, did you? And actually, and yet the GC chose nothing in there

00:47:46

but the photony.

00:47:47

So, okay, I have to back away a little bit.

00:47:49

I’ll say, okay, I was wrong.

00:47:51

It apparently is active.

00:47:53

My one case was one of my favorite

00:47:55

psychiatrists wanted to snort, so he took my entire

00:47:57

supply up the nose and got nowhere.

00:48:00

And so I assumed it was not active,

00:48:01

but then it may have been that it’s not an active psychiatrist.

00:48:04

I don’t know.

00:48:06

Anyway, this is where these are.

00:48:09

So what I am now uncovering is the fact that with a hydroxy group in this position,

00:48:15

at the five position, you have insulin compound.

00:48:18

That’s on the handout.

00:48:19

That’s the first thing on the handout.

00:48:21

I have it on the handout.

00:48:22

The upper one on the five methoxys, five hydroxys, five H, five hydrogen compounds on the handout. I have it on the handout. The ethyl went on the 5-methoxy, 5-hydroxy, 5-H, 5-hydrogen on the 5-position. And what I have across the top, methyl, H,

00:48:31

methyl, ethyl, isopropyl is a methyl, another methyl stuck on it. Propyl is a 3-carbon chain,

00:48:36

allyl is a 3-carbon chain, there’s a little bond in it. And going down this way, between

00:48:40

the two of them, you get the two substituents on that nitrogen. If an H is only one substituent,

00:48:46

if an HH, there are no substituents. So in that, by a little bit of them, you get the two substituents on that nitrogen. If it’s an H, there’s only one substituent. If it’s an HH, there’s no substituents. So in that, by a

00:48:48

little bit of thought, you can see what the actual

00:48:49

structure is. These are, a cotton are all

00:48:52

five hydrogen

00:48:53

mostly in this

00:48:56

and in that substituted

00:48:58

cryptamines.

00:48:59

And I written in there, 250

00:49:01

cryptamine itself is kind of a blood pressure

00:49:03

changer, not a nice thing.

00:49:06

Now, I never took it.

00:49:07

I gave it an activity level of 60, 60 milligrams of those.

00:49:10

It has to be smoked or taken parenterally.

00:49:13

It is not active orally.

00:49:14

Some people go to 140.

00:49:16

It is, with me, quite active.

00:49:18

I find that, although it’s a thing loved by a lot of experimentalists,

00:49:22

I happen to find it a dull thing.

00:49:25

Primarily, I find myself suddenly lying flat on my back

00:49:28

wondering what the hell I’m doing here.

00:49:29

I’m able to move.

00:49:30

Vision’s everywhere.

00:49:31

So what?

00:49:31

I just soon start doing something else.

00:49:33

In about 30, maybe 40 minutes,

00:49:36

I’m able to get around a little bit.

00:49:37

So that’s why it applies to me.

00:49:39

Many people dislike it.

00:49:40

I have to love it.

00:49:42

Anyway, let me go down here.

00:49:45

The methyl ethyl, methyl me go down here. The methyl

00:49:45

ethyl,

00:49:46

methyl isopropyl,

00:49:47

methyl propyl,

00:49:48

those you get

00:49:48

in larger groups

00:49:49

out there,

00:49:49

activity of

00:49:50

60 milligrams,

00:49:51

80 milligrams,

00:49:52

20 milligrams,

00:49:53

greater than 20

00:49:53

means that

00:49:54

they’re going

00:49:54

higher than 20.

00:49:56

The diethyl

00:49:57

is a fascinating

00:49:57

compound.

00:49:58

In the diethyl

00:49:59

over here

00:50:00

is an activity

00:50:01

of 100 milligrams

00:50:02

but it’s quite

00:50:03

poisonous.

00:50:04

It just gives you a bad thing.

00:50:06

You vomit.

00:50:06

You are not comfortable with your body.

00:50:07

Your body is just poisoned.

00:50:09

And I’ve found quite often when you have those two carbons on that nitrogen,

00:50:14

and including this horn over here, I have this,

00:50:16

pyridine T at 50 milligrams.

00:50:21

I’ve made others, but that’s as far as I go.

00:50:23

Again, very toxic.

00:50:25

And I’ll get down to the same thing with the 5-ethoxy,

00:50:27

it’s even worse down below.

00:50:29

But anyway, all the dyes are 60, 80, 40 here, 40 there,

00:50:33

250 there, 200 down at the bottom.

00:50:35

The dye allyl.

00:50:36

The dye allyl cryptamine, as I indicated, at 80 milligrams,

00:50:40

is an interesting compound.

00:50:41

It was published first by Stephen Zaha,

00:50:44

who is the head of the research of psycho-something-or-other in NIDA.

00:50:49

And I knew him quite well.

00:50:50

He was a great experimenter.

00:50:52

And he’d always make these compounds up.

00:50:54

And he always made them in a casual way.

00:50:56

In fact, often he had some technicians make the compounds.

00:50:59

And the technician was not particularly adept in chemistry.

00:51:02

And sometimes what was made had little resemblance to what he thought was made

00:51:05

and sometimes the label

00:51:06

on the bottle

00:51:07

did not have that much integrity

00:51:08

as to what was in the bottle.

00:51:10

I found this out

00:51:11

because there’s a person

00:51:12

who I’m not named

00:51:13

who was called

00:51:13

a perennial graduate student

00:51:15

who had a PhD

00:51:16

from somewhere in Israel

00:51:17

and he spent a year

00:51:18

in every laboratory

00:51:19

in the world

00:51:20

to learn how they knew

00:51:21

and how he could contribute

00:51:22

and he worked for a while

00:51:23

at NIDA

00:51:23

and did analyses

00:51:24

on a lot of these things.

00:51:26

And sorry, it’s interesting.

00:51:27

Countdowns, many are correct, some are wrong.

00:51:29

So it’s a little bit of a question mark.

00:51:30

He reported 80, he reported 60,

00:51:34

and then in a review reported 100

00:51:36

as being the active level of the diallo cryptamine.

00:51:40

Top half of the paper, the bottom ALAL,

00:51:43

that’s DALT, D-A-L-S-D-A-L-T

00:51:45

and I

00:51:47

actually went to the original paper and he said

00:51:49

he just gave it in a table

00:51:51

in the second paper he alluded to the first paper

00:51:54

as being something we tried

00:51:55

gave no pharmacology at all

00:51:57

and two sets of the papers he really

00:51:59

alluded to the second paper and no details

00:52:02

but it’s in there, it’s in all the

00:52:04

review papers as well the second half and no details, but it’s in there. It’s in all the review papers as well.

00:52:05

The second half of my time still, and

00:52:08

tell them it took a while.

00:52:12

I will wind up.

00:52:16

The second half, lower half of the table, is all this with a final methoxy group on it.

00:52:21

And it’s laid out in the same general pattern way. So what is

00:52:25

up there, you go the same shape down below and compare it with and with the methoxy group.

00:52:30

And suddenly you have 10s and 6s and 2s and 12s and 8s and 16s. Then your activities

00:52:36

up by a factor of about 5 in potency. And again, the diethyl is a really nasty one.

00:52:41

The diethyl 5 methoxy and the diethpythamine should be active up around 10 or so milligrams.

00:52:46

I log in above it, 12 down below.

00:52:49

But at 2 milligrams, my first was at 3 quarters of a milligram,

00:52:53

I had about the back door of the house vomiting.

00:52:55

And this is not usual when you smoke something.

00:52:57

That’s all.

00:52:58

When you take something like that, it’s very quickly vomiting.

00:53:01

And then I cost me with up to, I think, one and a quarter milligrams

00:53:05

three or four or five days later,

00:53:07

vomiting again,

00:53:08

and then violent diarrhea.

00:53:10

It was a very definitely toxic thing

00:53:11

to the body.

00:53:12

And the psychedelic level

00:53:14

should be around 10

00:53:15

if anything extrapolates

00:53:16

with any rational aspect.

00:53:18

The lower, there are 10, believe me,

00:53:20

because I can’t get over two

00:53:21

without really being a threat.

00:53:24

So the guy also, again, the corresponding piperidine compound,

00:53:28

piperidine is two ethyl groups attached to the carbon atom.

00:53:31

So in essence, you have that same diethyl nature.

00:53:33

I have two extremely negative two milligrams orally.

00:53:37

So that whole diethyl is a suspect.

00:53:40

But the diisopropyl, that would be the one of the IPA on the left and IPA

00:53:46

overhead, I have it as 12 milligrams,

00:53:48

is the one that’s gotten very

00:53:49

notorious right now on the internet

00:53:51

in the name of originally

00:53:52

methoxy, or methoxy-phoxy

00:53:55

which came first.

00:53:57

No one knew what a methoxy was, it was just called

00:53:59

foxy. And I think

00:54:02

it’s still commercially available. It’s not illegal.

00:54:05

It’s one that I was quite interested in because although I found it to be a rather mysterious and not deeply pleasant psychedelic,

00:54:12

but real, very, very real, a lot of sound distortion and visual,

00:54:18

what I found in subsequent exploring around, that about a third or half of those seasons had almost no side-feeling action,

00:54:26

but the primary value is an increase,

00:54:29

an intense increase of intensity of orgasm.

00:54:32

As I agree, we’ll give you the thing sticking out there,

00:54:35

but it doesn’t do anything on the orgasm intensity.

00:54:37

This doesn’t do a thing for erection.

00:54:39

But once you get to the orgasm,

00:54:40

that obvious combination of two effects.

00:54:42

We had a fellow down at Palenque

00:54:43

who worked for Pfizer,

00:54:44

I believe

00:54:45

his name

00:54:45

unmentioned

00:54:46

who was

00:54:47

intrigued

00:54:47

by the

00:54:47

fact that

00:54:48

this

00:54:49

methoxy

00:54:49

anodized

00:54:50

to propyl

00:54:50

tritamine

00:54:51

did enhance

00:54:52

Orgab

00:54:52

and he

00:54:53

made something

00:54:53

back in

00:54:54

Pfizer

00:54:54

that verified

00:54:54

by a

00:54:55

quiet mail

00:54:55

that it

00:54:56

worked for

00:54:56

him too

00:54:57

and this

00:54:58

Pfizer is

00:54:59

what makes

00:54:59

the Viagra

00:55:00

so he sent

00:55:01

a letter

00:55:01

to the

00:55:01

higher

00:55:02

echelons

00:55:02

here’s a

00:55:03

combination

00:55:04

of drugs that would be a fantastic litter if you you can get them together and put them this way.

00:55:09

And he sent me tacit, quiet, unidentified copies of the two people in higher management who answered.

00:55:16

One of them says, interesting idea, but we don’t want to get into it.

00:55:20

The other one says, you’re out of your skull.

00:55:22

So that’s nothing to come into reality, not to be fiasco anyway.

00:55:25

Anyway, so the reason I’m interested in this

00:55:27

is for a number of reasons.

00:55:29

The very bottom, lower right-hand corner,

00:55:31

the dialleo, which I call fibroxyclob,

00:55:34

is one I just now recently finished running up.

00:55:37

Ann and I shared it a few days ago,

00:55:40

a couple of weeks ago.

00:55:42

Strain at 16 milligrams.

00:55:44

12 milligrams is acne. 12 milligrams is acne.

00:55:46

8 milligrams is noticeable.

00:55:48

Not a psychedelic.

00:55:49

This is a psychedelic,

00:55:50

but you are in a…

00:55:52

My first response is,

00:55:53

I was looking from up here

00:55:55

at all the floor

00:55:56

and all the furniture

00:55:57

from about 10 feet in the air.

00:55:59

And I took her

00:56:00

at 10 feet tall

00:56:00

looking down at things.

00:56:02

Music, interesting.

00:56:04

Not a total ally, but

00:56:05

you have to indicate two

00:56:07

three-carbon chains with double bonds in there.

00:56:09

Fascinating. So I’m making bigger things

00:56:11

with triple bonds. I call this the

00:56:13

perpardal group, the diperpardal.

00:56:16

I’m making the compound the cyclopropyls

00:56:18

so you have your three-carbon formed rings.

00:56:20

Chemistry is a little tricky

00:56:21

in these. I’m making the compound…

00:56:23

Oh, a beautiful thing, I made it.

00:56:26

How many know what deuterium is?

00:56:29

It’s like hydrogen, exactly like hydrogen, except it’s a little bit heavier and a little bit smaller.

00:56:34

It’s like, it’s a little tiny.

00:56:36

So I just bought a methoxy-n-n-di-isopropyl-cyptamine

00:56:39

and very carefully made isopropyl iodide, bromide, I didn’t use the word bromide, it is me,

00:56:46

isopropyl bromide with 14 deuteriums.

00:56:49

And I put it on the pythamine.

00:56:51

So I have what I call D14,

00:56:53

which is diisopropyl 14 deuterium labeled

00:56:57

by the thoxy pythamine.

00:57:01

Who would have guessed?

00:57:02

It’s going to be more active, same activity, or less active

00:57:04

than the compound without 14 deuteriums?

00:57:06

More.

00:57:08

No votes.

00:57:09

Same.

00:57:11

Half a dozen.

00:57:12

Less.

00:57:13

Half a dozen.

00:57:14

Because I haven’t the foggiest idea.

00:57:17

I’m still running out,

00:57:18

but these are the fascinating things to answer.

00:57:20

Here you have two big isopropyl groups

00:57:22

sticking out on this,

00:57:23

and I can do it over this way,

00:57:25

two isopropyl groups that are 14 molecular units more

00:57:29

massy than the parent compound.

00:57:32

The PKA, PKB is the mean is probably off by a couple

00:57:35

tenths of a unit.

00:57:36

But I don’t care about that too much.

00:57:38

But you have a variant on it.

00:57:40

But it’s a little more snug.

00:57:41

The deuterium and alpha deuterium are more snug. They’re smaller than the ones with the hydrogen because that’s the little more snug. The deuterium and alpha-deuterium are more snug.

00:57:47

They’re smaller than the ones with the hydrogen,

00:57:48

because that’s the way they are.

00:57:51

So here’s a case where it’s either going to be more active,

00:57:53

same activity, or less active.

00:57:56

But to my knowledge, no one’s taken a psychoactive drug,

00:57:57

or very few drugs at all,

00:58:01

and made all the hydrogens out in the valid part of the molecule into deuteriums.

00:58:02

What a fascinating thing.

00:58:03

I’m not sure.

00:58:06

That’s exactly where I’m going now. This, you have the hydrogen,

00:58:10

5-hydrogen up here, the 5-lifoxy down there.

00:58:13

What I’m very interested in now is the 5-ethoxy.

00:58:16

This is going from one carbon dioxide

00:58:19

to a two carbon dioxide.

00:58:21

The parent compound is 5-ethoxy cryptamine. It has been made and studied in this country, one laboratory, in Russia, in one laboratory,

00:58:32

primarily as a protection against radiation poisoning.

00:58:35

It has nothing to do with the psychoanalysis.

00:58:37

It has been made there.

00:58:39

So I took all and went to the chemical literature to find out how many people have made dimethyl, diethyl,

00:58:47

isopropyl,

00:58:48

all these compounds.

00:58:50

None of them have been assayed in man.

00:58:53

In fact, the parent

00:58:54

has not been assayed in man.

00:58:56

And of all those compounds,

00:58:58

not one has even been synthesized.

00:59:02

The whole family

00:59:03

of dimethyl, diethyl, isopropyl,

00:59:04

isopropyl,, you name it,

00:59:07

are not in the literature. They haven’t even been made.

00:59:09

I think Glennon made some of those.

00:59:11

He made them along the outcome group.

00:59:13

With 5-ethoxy.

00:59:15

5-ethoxy, but not on hydroalphazone. I don’t think they were out on the action with it.

00:59:21

Yeah, I think they were out on something.

00:59:23

I have this literature. I have this writing.

00:59:25

I know he made a lot of old alkyl, long chain alkyls.

00:59:34

I went out to the death vessel or out to sea eight or nine or ten.

00:59:41

I did not realize he had put goodies on the nitrogen.

00:59:44

I’ll find out, I’ll find out.

00:59:46

Okay, he’s the kind of work you’d be into.

00:59:48

Glennon is in Virginia.

00:59:51

Chemist, laboratory in Virginia, Virginia.

00:59:54

Anyway, to me, this is to a, is this made in acceptance,

00:59:57

and I don’t think he’s dim, I assure you.

00:59:59

These are compounds that are to a large measure,

01:00:02

I think probably all, but maybe mostly all,

01:00:05

not only unexplored, but actually unmade.

01:00:08

Here’s an actually virgin territory.

01:00:10

It’s caught my fancy so much that I’ve sort of closed in a quiet way some of the cactus thing into a base,

01:00:16

because I want to get in the laboratory and start looking at things on that,

01:00:19

which is kind of where I am, where I’m going now.

01:00:21

This kind of picture of where things are and where they’re going to go, I’ll tell you later.

01:00:25

Any questions? Questions, questions, go, I’ll tell you later. Any questions?

01:00:28

Questions, questions, questions.

01:00:29

I’ll check these letters.

01:00:31

Questions?

01:00:32

Is deuterium okay to ingest?

01:00:37

Basically, an organic molecule

01:00:39

is often casually thought of

01:00:40

as not influencing the action of the molecule at all.

01:00:44

You take pure deuterated water,

01:00:46

heavy water,

01:00:46

B2O,

01:00:48

and you start

01:00:48

guzzling down

01:00:49

much of that,

01:00:49

you’re not going

01:00:49

to live long.

01:00:50

Because it gets

01:00:51

in the way of kinetics

01:00:52

a lot of by the chemistry.

01:00:53

You take pure

01:00:54

deuterium oxide,

01:00:56

heavy water,

01:00:56

and feed it to plants,

01:00:57

the plants die.

01:00:58

But up to about

01:01:00

a certain percentage

01:01:00

of different plants

01:01:01

and different animals,

01:01:02

you can go

01:01:02

with deuterated water

01:01:03

and get away with it.

01:01:05

The number of toxins

01:01:06

in the mind

01:01:06

is something like

01:01:06

50 or 60 percent

01:01:07

heavy water

01:01:08

allows you

01:01:09

to let the animal

01:01:11

or plant survive.

01:01:12

But that is

01:01:13

a very vital,

01:01:14

very high concentration.

01:01:15

In a molecule,

01:01:16

deuterium is actually

01:01:17

doing a lot of work

01:01:18

with nicotine,

01:01:19

nicotine metabolites.

01:01:20

For example,

01:01:21

a problem,

01:01:22

how does a person

01:01:23

who is a chronic smoker

01:01:25

metabolize nicotine?

01:01:29

well, you have to get nicotine into him

01:01:31

how do you get the nicotine into him?

01:01:32

you can see

01:01:33

because he’s using nicotine anyway

01:01:35

he’s a smoker all the time

01:01:36

but you want to see how he handles it

01:01:37

you can’t give him nicotine

01:01:38

because he takes nicotine all the time

01:01:40

so you put three deuteriums on nicotine

01:01:42

or four deuteriums on nicotine

01:01:43

give it a pass with this back or an injection with that specialty and with all the nicotine, or four deuteriums on nicotine, give it a pass

01:01:45

with that, or an injection with that special thing, and with all the nicotine all the time

01:01:49

in the body, you can see this deuterated thing come up, come out there and drop off.

01:01:53

So you begin getting metabolism of deuterated nicotine in a smoker, and we compare it with

01:01:58

the metabolism of deuterated nicotine in a non-smoker.

01:02:01

It gives a very small amount, you don’t get a nicotine effect, yet we’ve got permission

01:02:04

from the university to do this kind of work

01:02:07

in normal people.

01:02:09

And to a large major, it does not influence

01:02:10

the action of the drug.

01:02:12

To a large major.

01:02:13

Within our accuracy, there’s no effects there.

01:02:16

The area of per-degreed deuterium,

01:02:18

that means all the items possible going into deuterium,

01:02:21

is a virtually unsedded area.

01:02:23

Yes?

01:02:23

You mentioned a few of these that are

01:02:26

positively psychoactive and still legal.

01:02:31

What can I say about this?

01:02:32

Let me know what you find in interest.

01:02:35

Be cautious.

01:02:36

Remember, if you buy them as psychoactive materials

01:02:38

that have accidents similar to,

01:02:40

or substantially similar to,

01:02:42

a schedule I drug,

01:02:43

then you are indeed violating a basic rule of the analog bill,

01:02:48

and they may be legal to buy if you want to see if they make Petunia’s turn from red to green blossoms.

01:02:53

But taking in you to emulate the action of a scheduled run is a crime.

01:02:57

It can be charged as a crime, and the jury may find you guilty of one.

01:03:00

Good. Thank you very much.

01:03:01

Good, thank you very much I guess I should have probably warned you

01:03:10

that during his talk

01:03:12

Sasha was referring to some handouts

01:03:14

with drawings of the molecules

01:03:16

he was describing

01:03:17

and of course that’s what made it

01:03:20

possible for him to go so fast

01:03:22

a few times

01:03:23

but you’ve got to admit that a few of those speed-talking sections

01:03:27

were really music to your ears, weren’t they?

01:03:30

And by the way, if anyone happens to have a copy of those handouts

01:03:34

and can scan them and send them to me,

01:03:36

I’ll be happy to post them on the Shogun’s page on our Planque Norte site.

01:03:41

So that’d be great to get out there if somebody has one or two copies still hanging around somewhere.

01:03:49

So I hope you weren’t planning on hearing a definitive answer on that great debate about natural versus synthetics.

01:03:58

I know that Sasha mentioned the topic a few times, but I can’t say I’m any more clear on the subject than I was before.

01:04:08

Personally, I take the safe bet side of that issue, and even though the psychoactive molecules are the same either way,

01:04:16

I’m keeping my bet on the natural side simply because, as you already know,

01:04:21

there’s always the possibility that in addition to the known psychoactive substances,

01:04:27

there could also be some other chemical presence that maybe combine and synergize the main ingredient

01:04:34

to give you a little bit more bang for the buck.

01:04:36

Who knows?

01:04:38

And didn’t you find it interesting that in many cases,

01:04:42

it was only after the compound had been synthesized in a

01:04:46

laboratory that it’s discovered later in nature. You know, I’ve heard rumors that even our beloved

01:04:53

MDMA appears to have a natural counterpart somewhere out there growing wildly. Now that

01:05:02

you’ve heard what goes into designing a substance that just might be psychoactive,

01:05:08

and you chemists, of course, can also appreciate the steps required to synthesize a new compound,

01:05:14

well, stop for just a minute and think about the last and, I think, most important step in this whole process,

01:05:22

and that’s the human testing step.

01:05:24

important step in this whole process, and that’s the human testing step.

01:05:32

Not only did Sasha create those 200 plus compounds he talks about in his books, he also tested them on himself.

01:05:35

Now here, I believe, is at least for me the most important part of Sasha’s story.

01:05:41

He always began with extremely small amounts, and then, if he didn’t get a tingle

01:05:47

of some kind, he would still only increase the dose a really small amount on the next

01:05:53

trial, which would be days later. Caution, caution, extreme caution, I think is probably

01:06:01

why Sasha Shulgin has lived to such a ripe old age.

01:06:05

And I hope he is an example to those of you out there

01:06:09

who might be inclined to always begin testing something new,

01:06:13

at least new to you, by starting at the high end of the suggested dose scale.

01:06:20

And, of course, if you don’t know the recommended dose on something,

01:06:26

go to PCOL, T-COL.

01:06:35

It doesn’t tell you how to synthesize and have experience reports, but it also has the dosage recommendations.

01:06:38

So don’t try to be a hero.

01:06:43

Taking overly high doses doesn’t make you a hero in my book.

01:06:45

It’s really pretty foolish, you know.

01:06:48

So be careful out there.

01:06:49

We need each and every one of you.

01:06:56

Besides, you don’t want to miss all the fun that’s coming on down the pike at us, do you?

01:07:01

Well, I guess I better quit chattering here and let you go for now. If you’re looking to buy a copy of P. Call or T. Call or both,

01:07:06

I think it would be very cool of you to buy it directly from the Shulgin’s Publishing Company,

01:07:11

which is Transform Press at Post Office Box 13675 in Berkeley, California, 94712.

01:07:21

And I have to admit, I forgot to ask Ann and Sasha

01:07:25

what they’re charging for a copy of their books these days

01:07:28

so I’ll send them an email and find out

01:07:31

and I’ll post it on our webpage on the Matrix Master site as soon as I know

01:07:35

so you can get to that Shulgin page through the podcast as you know

01:07:40

and of course you can also get a copy of their books at Amazon and in most bookstores.

01:07:49

Well, thank you, Sasha, for letting us podcast this talk and for everything you’ve done for all of us.

01:07:57

You know, saying thank you just isn’t even close to expressing how the tribe feels about you and Ann.

01:08:03

So thank you both for everything.

01:08:06

And a great big thank you to John Hanna,

01:08:08

who produced all these Mind States conferences,

01:08:11

and of course to Kevin Whitesides for the recording.

01:08:16

Jacques Cordell and Wells of Chateau Hayouk,

01:08:19

thanks as always, of course,

01:08:20

for the use of your music here in the Psychedelic Salon.

01:08:23

And I want to thank each and every one of you

01:08:26

out there for joining us here

01:08:28

in the psychedelic salon

01:08:29

for now this is Lorenzo

01:08:32

signing off from cyberdelic space

01:08:35

be well my friends

01:08:37

hi this is Lorenzo again.

01:08:47

The program you just heard was one of my first 70 podcasts,

01:08:51

which I produced in 2005 and 2006.

01:08:55

Over the last few years, I like to think that the shows have gotten a little better,

01:08:59

and now there are around 200 free programs for you to listen to here in the salon,

01:09:04

with more coming out each month.

01:09:07

For the first four years of the salon,

01:09:09

our expenses were covered by a small army of donors

01:09:12

who contributed their hard-earned cash

01:09:14

to help offset the costs of equipment, disk space, and bandwidth, among other things.

01:09:20

And some of those donors have repeated their generosity on more than one occasion.

01:09:24

But it’s always kind of bothered me that, And some of those donors have repeated their generosity on more than one occasion.

01:09:30

But it’s always kind of bothered me that by mentioning the donors’ names at the beginning of the program,

01:09:34

I was also indirectly soliciting more donations for the salon.

01:09:37

And in a way, I guess that’s a fair assessment.

01:09:43

However, the majority of our fellow salonners, I find, aren’t in a position to make a donation.

01:09:45

And from the email I receive, it seems to bother people that they can’t do that. So I’ve made a little change lately

01:09:50

in that I removed the donation button from our web page and stopped accepting monetary donations.

01:09:57

Instead, I have decided to fund the operation of the salon from the sales of my audiobook,

01:10:02

The Genesis Generation. And while the $12 cost is still too much for many of our salonners,

01:10:08

we only have to sell about a dozen books a month to cover our costs,

01:10:11

and so far we’re on track for doing that.

01:10:14

So if you’re interested in helping to support the Psychedelic Salon financially,

01:10:18

you can do so by either buying a copy of my novel for yourself

01:10:22

or by sending a gift certificate for one to a friend.

01:10:22

either buying a copy of my novel for yourself or by sending a gift certificate for one to a friend.

01:10:25

And as you already know,

01:10:26

you can listen to the first chapter for free

01:10:28

in my podcast number 186.

01:10:32

And if after hearing the first chapter,

01:10:33

should you want to buy a copy,

01:10:34

you may do so through my website

01:10:36

at www.genesisgeneration.us.

01:10:41

And hey, thanks again for listening

01:10:43

to The Psychedelic Salon.

01:10:45

I’m really glad you found us.