Program Notes

Guest speaker: Terence McKenna

[NOTE: All quotations are by Terence McKenna.]
“Psychedelics, by metling assumptions, by destroying the expectations of rigid educations creates a fluidity of possibility that may allow answers to emerge. And it’s the only thing that I’ve seen that operates on a time scale sufficiently short to have an impact.”

“Language is a strategy for binding time.”

“The other thing is that biology works. It’s very successful. It’s been around more than a billion years. Civilization doesn’t work. It’s been around 10,000 years, and it’s on the brink of meltdown.”

“We fabricate ideas out of matter. No other creature does that.”

“One of the unique things that is happening on the planet is that the fate of all life is becoming hinged to the decisions made by a single species.”

“If there’s not free will, then thinking is meaningless.”

“But all we have to do is hit one speed bump, and democratic values are down the drain.”

Previous Episode

386 - Loose Ends Time

Next Episode

388 - Wherever You Are, Be There!

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

Greetings from cyberdelic space.

00:00:19

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:23

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:30

And our fellow salonners who have made recent donations to help offset some of our monthly expenses here in the salon,

00:00:40

well, those people are Floris M., Shane N., Alex B., Michael W., Sean V., and Benjamin P.

00:00:44

So I thank you one and all for your continued support of these podcasts. I really couldn’t do it without your help.

00:00:48

Now, today we’re going to get to compare last week’s podcast,

00:00:52

which was from the final session of a weekend workshop that Terrence McKenna led in May of 1990.

00:00:59

Well, we’re going to compare that with today’s talk,

00:01:01

which features the opening session of a weekend workshop that took place four years later, well, about four years later, February of

00:01:08
  1. Now, while I’m going to play the entire opening session, where Terrence would go around
00:01:15

the room and let everyone introduce themselves and perhaps ask a question or make a statement,

00:01:21

however, I feel that in the interest of the privacy of the participants,

00:01:25

many of whom gave their full names, that, well, I shouldn’t include many of their comments, which

00:01:31

were difficult to hear in any event. But Terrence’s comments to some of the statements that were made,

00:01:38

well, I think they’re worth hearing. So I’ve edited out the participants for the most part and left in Mr. T.

00:01:46

One more thing now before I play this talk, and that is in just a few minutes,

00:01:51

you’re going to hear Terrence talk about what he calls the defining dose.

00:01:56

Now I may be losing my memory earlier than I planned on,

00:01:59

but I can’t remember him ever saying that phrase before, a defining dose.

00:02:05

It’s an interesting concept that I hadn’t thought of in that way before.

00:02:09

Maybe since this talk came closer to the end of Terrence’s life, it’s a little more mature in the way how he is framing some of his thoughts.

00:02:17

And so in a moment, we’ll join Terrence McKenna and a few friends on a February weekend in 1994,

00:02:23

which means that the Northridge earthquake

00:02:26

that hit L.A. was still very fresh in everyone’s minds, for what that’s worth.

00:02:31

Also, as we will hear shortly, this was just one week before Terence McKenna got his very

00:02:38

first internet connection.

00:02:40

So let’s join him now for the introduction to the last weekend workshop that Terrence McKenna led before getting his first personal connection to cyberdelic space.

00:02:50

Tonight to basically get people recognizing each other and to help me understand the priorities of the group, we’ll do what we always do,

00:03:02

we’ll do what we always do which is basically just go around

00:03:05

quickly

00:03:06

and you can

00:03:08

say who you are

00:03:10

or some identifier

00:03:12

and say what your

00:03:14

particular slant or hope

00:03:17

or interest is

00:03:18

or profession or anything

00:03:20

just so I can tell you how many

00:03:22

art historians, how many shrinks

00:03:24

how many this, how many that

00:03:26

and what the focus of interest is

00:03:29

whether it’s all psychedelic or it’s about time

00:03:32

or you know prehistory

00:03:36

or whatever

00:03:37

so why don’t we just start and by a sort of random process

00:03:41

make our way around

00:03:43

well that’s worth talking about.

00:03:45

I mean, one thing that needs to be made clear

00:03:48

if we’re going to talk about psychedelic experiences

00:03:51

is there are all kinds of altered states.

00:03:55

I mean, who knows how many there are.

00:03:59

Nitrous states, ketamine states,

00:04:02

meditative states, post-orgasmic states, all these states. I’m

00:04:10

particularly interested in what’s called the psychedelic experience. It’s something which

00:04:16

is pretty chemically confined. It’s confined to these indoles, psilocybin, ibogaine, LSD, DMT, beta-carbolines, indole hallucinogens.

00:04:32

And one thing that is a problem when you talk about this is a lot of people think that they have psychedelic experience

00:04:42

when in fact they’ve only just shaved the under tummy of the beast.

00:04:47

And all drug states, all stimulatory drug states in their initial presentation present themselves the same way.

00:05:02

As speed, as rushing thoughts

00:05:06

as a kind of euphoria

00:05:08

and giddiness

00:05:09

but

00:05:10

that’s why I stress

00:05:14

the defining dose

00:05:16

meaning a sufficient

00:05:18

dose of a psychedelic that you

00:05:19

see what they do that no

00:05:21

other thing does

00:05:23

and what they do is a fairly profound deconstruction

00:05:29

of uh of all constructions one of the thing one of the categories of effect

00:05:37

is what’s called boundary dissolution they profoundly dissolve boundaries I mean between yourself and the stone you’re

00:05:48

sitting on or yourself

00:05:50

and somebody else or yourself and

00:05:52

traumatic material in your own

00:05:54

past and this boundary

00:05:56

dissolution thing

00:05:57

is a very sensitive issue

00:06:00

with human beings

00:06:01

because

00:06:02

identity is

00:06:06

maintenance of boundary

00:06:08

and yet

00:06:09

yes we are our clothes

00:06:10

we are who we say we are

00:06:12

and yet because of our sexual drive

00:06:15

which is a drive toward boundary dissolution

00:06:17

we have this weird ambivalence

00:06:19

about boundary dissolution

00:06:21

we also understand that death

00:06:23

is boundary dissolution

00:06:24

so is sleep.

00:06:26

So we’re surrounded by this possibility.

00:06:30

That happens in a waking state,

00:06:34

in psychedelics, in a fairly profound way.

00:06:37

The other thing that happens that I stress,

00:06:40

that some people say I overstress,

00:06:43

but it’s just my personal epistemological bias,

00:06:49

is vision.

00:06:51

That it’s not enough to have rushing thoughts.

00:06:55

It’s not enough to have strange feelings.

00:06:58

It’s not enough to recover childhood memories.

00:07:01

It’s not enough to conceive of wild schemes. There has

00:07:06

to be a point where

00:07:08

the upwelling

00:07:10

of creativity actually

00:07:12

pushes over into

00:07:14

the visual cortex.

00:07:16

And that, to my

00:07:18

mind, is the distinguishing

00:07:20

characteristic, is when you see it.

00:07:22

And this is the first thing, if

00:07:24

somebody wants to tell me an experience, the first thing I ask is did you hallucinate and

00:07:30

even making sure that the person understands the question is not easy

00:07:35

because even in the realm of hallucination there’s a gradient you

00:07:40

know there’s phosphenes we all know what those are I mean that’s what you see when you press on your eyelids

00:07:46

or you stand up suddenly

00:07:48

and you see rushing green and yellow

00:07:51

lights, phosphenes

00:07:52

there’s also what’s called hypnagogia

00:07:55

dancing mice

00:07:57

little candies

00:07:58

small wheels

00:08:00

string beans, pebbles

00:08:02

all these things in marching

00:08:04

endless array emotionally

00:08:07

neutral but visually discernible and then there is content which becomes

00:08:13

progressively less and less Englishable until finally you know you’re you are in

00:08:19

the presence of something that is somehow fully itself

00:08:25

and yet beyond rational apprehension

00:08:29

and yet present.

00:08:32

And that, to my mind, is the payoff.

00:08:36

And then the name of the game

00:08:37

is to watch your mind

00:08:40

as over and over again you drop it

00:08:43

like a depth gauge or something

00:08:47

into this deeper and deeper medium

00:08:49

where it always deconstructs in the same way

00:08:52

or in generally the same way

00:08:54

and then in the core of all this deconstructing

00:08:58

hopefully and in the substances I prefer

00:09:01

there is a core observer

00:09:03

that is never wiped out, never destroyed, never compromised, and that’s the recorder who is taking the film that is going to later be developed and whatever good comes out of this is then going to be brought back. And someone over here mentioned art and creativity, psychedelics as catalysts for creativity.

00:09:29

This is precisely what they are, both culturally and individually.

00:09:32

What they do is they cause a catalysis of the imagination.

00:09:38

Well, the imagination is the thumbprint of deity,

00:09:46

not to put too fine a point on it,

00:09:49

on our species.

00:09:50

In other words, it is the part of ourselves

00:09:53

that is most mysterious,

00:09:55

most potentially interpretable as transcendent.

00:10:00

And yet, you know, the paradox of materialism

00:10:04

is that chemicals, substances, drugs impinge on this most evanescent, spiritual, transcendent, and somehow highly valued portion of the self.

00:10:22

Well, then what does that mean about the nature of mind

00:10:26

and the nature of cognition and where being

00:10:29

stands in the order of things?

00:10:32

You know, what is the mind and what is its place

00:10:35

in nature? And I don’t pretend

00:10:38

to have answers, I just pretend to have the method.

00:10:42

And the method is to perturb

00:10:44

the mind in the method is to perturb the mind

00:10:46

in the same way that physics

00:10:48

perturbs the atom

00:10:50

in order to understand

00:10:52

its constituent parts

00:10:53

you have to pump energy into the system

00:10:56

and then cause its boundaries

00:10:58

to rupture and then

00:11:00

study the phenomena

00:11:02

that result from that

00:11:03

the mind is similar, it’s like a mirrored

00:11:06

surface. It’s perfectly still. As long as you don’t perturb it, it will give back a

00:11:11

perfect reflection of your expectation. But if you know, this psychedelic thing

00:11:27

operates on two levels in my mind.

00:11:31

First of all, it’s this old, old, old

00:11:35

touchstone of mystery

00:11:37

that is linked to our humanness,

00:11:40

to our sexuality, to our creativity,

00:11:48

to our language, all of these things.

00:11:51

And in the course of the weekend, this will all be teased out. But these parts of ourselves are somehow in that, out of that.

00:11:58

And then the other side is that there is a kind of urgency,

00:12:04

a kind of pregnancy about this issue

00:12:08

because our crisis as a global culture is in fact a crisis of insufficient consciousness,

00:12:17

insufficient awareness, insufficient love, insufficient feeling.

00:12:23

So we only have two methods supposed to impact

00:12:28

on this problem. One is called religion. The other is called ecstatic drugs, plants. And

00:12:34

religion has failed. Religion has had the game to itself for 5,000 years in the West.

00:12:40

And this is no joke. You know, the culture is in crisis

00:12:46

and it’s a planetary culture

00:12:49

there is very little doubt

00:12:51

but that the neck, the choke point

00:12:54

of the next 5,000 years of history

00:12:58

lies in the next 50 years

00:13:00

what I mean by that is

00:13:02

that we are going to get the correct managerial techniques, social policies and attitudes in place or we’re going to go extinct in the next little while.

00:13:28

by destroying the expectations of rigid educations creates a fluidity of possibility

00:13:32

that may allow answers to emerge.

00:13:37

And it’s the only thing that I’ve seen

00:13:43

that operates on the time scale sufficiently

00:13:46

short to have an impact

00:13:48

in other words we are not

00:13:50

getting a handle on our problems

00:13:52

there’s very little sign

00:13:53

of a deceleration

00:13:55

of the lethal tendencies

00:13:58

in our society

00:13:59

I don’t know how it would be done

00:14:02

one of the things worth talking

00:14:04

about is

00:14:04

are there practical understandable schemes I don’t know how it would be done. One of the things worth talking about is, you know,

00:14:05

are there practical, understandable schemes

00:14:09

for halting what is happening to our species and the Earth?

00:14:14

Well, there’s no doubt that there will be a system.

00:14:17

Well, so then, but then, you know, there’s a larger question,

00:14:20

which is, is history a kind of gestation?

00:14:24

Is it no more to be concerned that we’re using up all this stuff

00:14:28

than that a fetal life in the womb eventually uses up all the stuff

00:14:34

and it initiates a crisis?

00:14:37

Then, you know, there’s strangulation, toxification, earthquakes, collapse,

00:14:44

and it turns out this is how it’s done,

00:14:47

and everything is carried into a new dimension,

00:14:51

and unfolds at a different level.

00:14:53

This is an interesting question,

00:14:56

because I don’t think you can have it both ways.

00:14:59

It’s either that the earth is our home,

00:15:02

and we are to become its gardeners,

00:15:07

and there is no salvation anywhere but here and we like that right or the earth is not our home we are strangers in this universe

00:15:14

we belong in a higher and hidden realm made of light which we will achieve through a monolithic

00:15:20

faustian technical something or other it’s the old Gnostic two-step

00:15:28

where do you come down on that

00:15:31

and in a sense the deck is stacked

00:15:34

in favor of the Gnostic point of view

00:15:36

because we’ve been playing a Gnostic game

00:15:39

for a couple of thousand years

00:15:40

I mean Christianity, don’t let them kid you

00:15:43

all they did was exterminate

00:15:45

the competition. But it’s

00:15:48

a thoroughgoing dualism.

00:15:50

I mean, it’s as thoroughgoing as all

00:15:52

the dualisms it was

00:15:54

so enthusiastic to stomp

00:15:56

out.

00:15:57

Well, because Western civilization

00:16:00

is apocalyptically wired

00:16:02

for self-destruction. It

00:16:04

doesn’t have any open steady-state model of itself

00:16:08

it always builds toward Ragnarok for well I think you glimpse it this whole psychedelic thing I

00:16:16

think is the the raison d’etre is not the chaos of the experience, which is orgasmic, delightful, transcendental,

00:16:27

but the honing of the mind that goes on

00:16:31

so that when you come down,

00:16:34

you see it all very differently

00:16:35

and you see it rather more like an author.

00:16:39

You understand that people are characters.

00:16:44

You understand that people are characters. You understand that motivation matters.

00:16:49

You understand that timing matters.

00:16:52

And you understand that there are two kinds of people,

00:16:55

those who understand what’s going on

00:16:57

and those who are being manipulated

00:16:59

by those who understand what’s going on.

00:17:01

Yeah.

00:17:02

Well, I’d like to believe they unconceal something

00:17:05

that we’re not what they show you is that you’re not the victim of physics

00:17:09

you’re not the victim that this is not a universe of laws that you are somehow a

00:17:16

citizen of that it’s it well like the law of gravity the law of anything that

00:17:22

it is that is all a fiction.

00:17:27

That what it really is, is some kind of… This is what I was trying to get back to about the plot.

00:17:30

It’s a story.

00:17:32

It’s some kind of a story.

00:17:35

And your job then is to awaken to this fact

00:17:39

and then to, using that knowledge…

00:17:44

I mean, I…

00:17:49

To play the role that’s given to you mean I well and to transform it to see yourself as a character

00:17:52

rather than a victim of laws

00:17:55

you are not a victim of laws

00:17:57

you are a character inside a work of art

00:17:59

well there is a way basically to make your dreams come true

00:18:04

I think and it’s

00:18:05

nothing more than a slight forward lean into the energy field and then it works

00:18:14

that’s all it is oh yes I am NOT Prince Hamlet nor was meant to be I’m an

00:18:21

attendant Lord will do to swell a scene start a

00:18:25

procession advise the prince careful meticulous at times a bit ridiculous I’m

00:18:32

not sure that’s absolutely apropos but it’s yes that’s right he saw that he saw

00:18:41

that it was a play but then he he said he was an attendant lord.

00:18:46

And I think, you know, people say, well, then once you see that it’s a play,

00:18:50

then you can transform your character.

00:18:54

True to a point, but more importantly,

00:18:57

I think the real wisdom in all of this is to become the author.

00:19:02

You know, the author can reach back in

00:19:06

and choreograph and lead the thing

00:19:11

and redeem not only his character,

00:19:14

but all the characters,

00:19:15

and to make of life something plotted,

00:19:18

because left to itself,

00:19:20

you know, as it says in Finnegan’s Wake,

00:19:22

we flop on the seamy side. Here in Moy’s Wake we flop on the seamy side here in

00:19:27

Moy Kaine we flop on the seamy side but attention coax it into art and that’s

00:19:35

why intelligence is indispensable to good art you know this idea of the

00:19:41

enfant terrible I’m not buying buying this. Intelligence is the indispensable handmaiden of art

00:19:48

because it’s somehow consciousness itself,

00:19:51

consciousness of the how of the way things unfold.

00:19:58

Well, anyway, we have our own value system.

00:20:01

I mean, Marcello Ficino said, man, and he meant by that

00:20:05

humanity, man is

00:20:07

the measure of all things.

00:20:10

Man is the measure of all things.

00:20:11

It’s not what God wants, or the

00:20:13

earth wants, or

00:20:15

the only point of view which makes

00:20:17

sense for us is a

00:20:19

human point of view. Obviously,

00:20:21

you know, the earth has achieved

00:20:23

great things outside the human realm

00:20:26

but within the human realm you know uh mozart and bach and milton and rumi and all of this stuff

00:20:37

has been achieved and it represents an epigenetic accomplishment the It is not part of the gene swarm of the planet

00:20:46

that stretches from viruses through to the mammals.

00:20:49

It is something else,

00:20:51

something some people, the materialists say,

00:20:54

an iridescence on matter.

00:20:57

But what an iridescence?

00:20:58

I mean, I think the human enterprise is,

00:21:02

and I will argue that it’s central to the cosmic drama that we are

00:21:06

not witnesses to nature that’s not what it is that the what Christianity

00:21:14

suppressed was a sense of invocative magic as the human relationship to the world history is a kind of alchemical sublimation

00:21:29

it’s a rarefaction and a distillation of something and you know people say well you know what’s the

00:21:37

argument for the transcendent for the eminence of the transcendent the argument for the eminence

00:21:42

of the transcendent is the presence of human history

00:21:46

on the planet if it were a planet of groundhogs butterflies and reindeer herds darwinian mechanics

00:21:53

and so forth would nicely take care of the situation the fact that it is home to the striving

00:22:00

of a civilized idea producing species species means that nature is trying to birth itself in a new way,

00:22:11

almost to epigenetically explode itself

00:22:15

out of the very deep and highly inertial creode

00:22:24

of ordinary

00:22:25

organic existence

00:22:27

and yeah that

00:22:29

biology the slow endless

00:22:31

march of biology you know

00:22:33

1.4 billion years of

00:22:35

biology and suddenly

00:22:36

self-reflection appears

00:22:39

and in a million years

00:22:41

produces more change

00:22:43

than had been seen in the previous billion years.

00:22:47

An order of several magnitudes of compression of time, of compression of novelty, takes place here.

00:22:54

And the human world is the domain of that drama.

00:23:11

no well I think human history is an incredibly brief unstable kind of metamorphosis it’s like you know you have caterpillars and then they form a chrysalis and then every enzyme system in this

00:23:18

organic system goes berserk and essentially the thing melts and when when it is recast, it emerges as an entirely different kind of creature.

00:23:30

History is not some meaningless or existentially empty process

00:23:36

that has escaped from the bridle of nature.

00:23:41

That’s preposterous.

00:23:42

It is simply a natural process

00:23:45

of a very unusual kind that occurs

00:23:48

in a social species with a given

00:23:51

density of neurons, a given sophistication

00:23:54

of language and so forth and so on. And then the

00:23:57

innate creativity that is locked

00:24:00

in matter that causes

00:24:02

electrons and protons to congregate into atoms, that causes you know electrons and protons

00:24:06

to congregate into atoms

00:24:08

that causes atoms to congregate into

00:24:10

molecules that causes molecules to

00:24:12

congregate into long chain polymers

00:24:14

this endless

00:24:15

self

00:24:18

transcending through

00:24:19

new forms of order that

00:24:22

takes place at every level in nature

00:24:24

is when it happens

00:24:25

in animal nature

00:24:27

it bubbles over

00:24:29

into self-reflecting consciousness

00:24:31

which is a strategy for time

00:24:34

binding, that’s basically

00:24:36

binding

00:24:37

so language is a strategy

00:24:40

for binding time

00:24:41

it says remember last week

00:24:43

when we saw the reindeer

00:24:44

like that.

00:24:47

And then writing is a further time binding and then electronic media is an effort to actually

00:24:53

stop the fading of time at all and to create a kind of nunc stans, an endlessly expanding

00:25:01

electronically stabilized now where all data is suspended in some kind of super space of accessibility.

00:25:09

Time binding, now happening epigenetically through our species.

00:25:13

The thing about history that I don’t believe,

00:25:16

that I don’t see how the rationalists can believe,

00:25:20

is that it can be extrapolated endlessly into the future.

00:25:24

It can’t even be extrapolated hundreds of years into the future.

00:25:28

It is obviously a rate-limiting process of some sort

00:25:32

that is forcing everything into a situation

00:25:35

where only more and more radical perturbation

00:25:38

can break it out of this self-canceling cycle that it’s into.

00:25:44

So like the birth process and like the death process

00:25:48

it is now irreversible so wherever we’re going we are going and the question is

00:25:57

you know where are we going and can we uh can we make some sense about it?

00:26:08

Well, and the other thing is that biology works.

00:26:11

Biology works. It’s very successful.

00:26:13

It’s been around more than a billion years.

00:26:15

Civilization doesn’t work.

00:26:19

It’s been around 10,000 years, and it’s on the brink of meltdown. So this attention to nature is an effort to study something which works

00:26:25

and then organize yourself like that.

00:26:30

And if that could be done, if we could make that intellectual leap,

00:26:35

there might be a certain measure of hope.

00:26:37

At least that’s one of the pieces of the puzzle,

00:26:40

to be able to produce things with low temperature catalytic chemistry

00:26:45

that doesn’t require high temperature and high pressure

00:26:48

which is how it’s now done in modern industrial fabrication processes

00:26:52

in all of nature on this planet

00:26:55

organic nature you don’t get temperatures much above 130 degrees

00:27:00

and yet redwood trees are produced

00:27:03

coral reefs are produced

00:27:04

at low temperature, at low pressure degrees and yet redwood trees are produced coral reefs are produced you know things of amazing

00:27:06

complexity produced at low temperature at low pressure yes everything yeah originally from

00:27:13

this kind of but somehow something else put us here and that we belong into this other realm

00:27:17

that we’re trying to get to well not so much that i mean you don’t have to evoke extraterrestrials. It’s just that, you know, is the Earth some kind of ultimate value to be preserved?

00:27:29

Or is it no more to be preserved than, say, a placenta?

00:27:34

This is the question.

00:27:36

Is it the baby or is it the placenta?

00:27:39

That goes off the question of what is humanity’s role on the Earth?

00:27:43

Are we a fetus or are we a cancer?

00:27:44

That’s right. That’s right.

00:27:46

That’s right.

00:27:46

But saying we’re a cancer is, you know, what we are is we’re different.

00:27:53

We’re very, very different.

00:27:54

We fabricate ideas out of matter.

00:27:58

No other creature does that.

00:28:00

Some creatures fabricate genetic programming into matter.

00:28:06

They build termite nests and honeycombs and coral reefs. But each, those kinds of animals have incredibly limited

00:28:13

repertoire. And it changes very, very slowly under, and it’s not under conscious control.

00:28:20

We, on the other hand, you know, can trade in our entire cultural model every 6 to 18 months if we want.

00:28:30

The world is incredibly conservative, and we are not.

00:28:37

The world will test a single modification on itself for 10,000 years before ruling yay or nay. We will generate

00:28:47

50 models of automobile in 40 years.

00:28:53

So we have gone from Christian generational

00:28:56

times in 2,000 years to where we are now in a technological

00:29:00

conscious awareness sense with the same biological capacity.

00:29:04

Yes. Our culture could have been played on the biology of 2,000 years ago.

00:29:08

It definitely could have.

00:29:10

The programming that we’re manifesting right now

00:29:12

is a program that’s running on a biological machine

00:29:16

that is much, much older.

00:29:19

The hardware doesn’t change, but the software changes.

00:29:23

I mean, in 1660, Newton invents the calculus.

00:29:28

The software changes.

00:29:29

In the 900s in the Umayyad Caliphate of Baghdad, they invent algebra.

00:29:35

These are like system upgrades is what they are.

00:29:39

And in the 20th century, incredibly powerful tools,

00:29:46

century, you know, incredibly powerful tools. In fact, tools so powerful that no single monkey understands or applies them.

00:29:50

We have massively powerful technology, but it is also flawed conceptually. And given

00:29:56

a reasonable awareness and given that human consciousness is some channel for novelty,

00:30:01

we can work on our technology if that’s the direction that we choose to go.

00:30:07

Well, we are the flexible part of technology.

00:30:10

Or Marshall McLuhan put it more graphically.

00:30:12

He said, we are the genitals of our machines.

00:30:15

We exist to make sure that next year’s model is better.

00:30:21

It’s not very far off.

00:30:23

Well, right now, for instance instance when they design very densely

00:30:27

packed circuitry they tell the computer to optimize the packing but they don’t specify

00:30:33

the final solution the computer itself decides the final optimized close packing of the circuitry

00:30:40

it’s very interesting that as the organic realm becomes more and more uninhabitable

00:30:46

we appear to be preparing

00:30:48

a kind of an electronic

00:30:49

trap door for ourselves

00:30:51

that there is the possibility

00:30:54

some people

00:30:56

like Hans Moravik and Frank

00:30:57

Tipler and people like that think

00:30:59

you know that we are destined

00:31:01

to essentially become our machines

00:31:04

and to

00:31:04

the projection of problems because of the fact that our material technology that we are destined to essentially become our machines.

00:31:07

The projection of problems,

00:31:10

because of the fact that our material technology is so great,

00:31:13

we may in fact project the problems to the point where they manifest themselves and become unmistakable.

00:31:17

And that may be what spurs us to solve them in some sense or another.

00:31:20

Well, primates love a good fight.

00:31:23

And the fight hasn’t begun yet. I mean, good fight and the fight

00:31:25

hasn’t begun yet

00:31:26

this is not the fight

00:31:27

this is the long garden party

00:31:29

before the fight

00:31:31

this is the groaning buffet

00:31:34

tables, the literary conversation

00:31:37

the women in the

00:31:38

tule dresses

00:31:39

but the fight will come

00:31:43

and

00:31:43

I’m very interested

00:31:47

in the human condition

00:31:48

and what we represent

00:31:50

as an experiment of nature

00:31:54

and an investment of nature

00:31:55

nature has put all life on this planet at risk

00:31:59

for this experiment in self-reflection

00:32:04

intelligence for this experiment in self-reflection, intelligence, material downloading of ideas into matter.

00:32:11

If there is an appetition for completion,

00:32:14

as Alfred North Whitehead thought,

00:32:16

then we have turned a corner

00:32:19

in the high-stakes game of nature’s unfoldment.

00:32:24

Just to hear you talk about it. stakes game of nature’s unfoldment well I mean

00:32:27

certainly they have a right to live on the planet

00:32:30

I don’t know where

00:32:31

all that lies

00:32:33

95% of all

00:32:35

species that have ever existed

00:32:37

on the planet are extinct

00:32:39

nature is really an

00:32:42

engine for the production of

00:32:43

extinct species, apparently.

00:32:46

At any given moment, only 5-7% are alive.

00:32:50

There have been enormous diebacks in the past.

00:32:56

Ebb and flow of dieback is one way in which evolutionary advancement takes place,

00:33:03

because it’s in competition for

00:33:06

newly impoverished environments

00:33:09

that speciation takes place

00:33:12

like it’s thought by most evolutionary biologists

00:33:14

that before the rise of industrial civilization

00:33:19

the main force creating speciation

00:33:22

among plants on this planet

00:33:24

was the

00:33:25

meandering of rivers

00:33:27

because rivers

00:33:29

produce in the course of meandering

00:33:32

sandbar

00:33:34

environments

00:33:35

and desertified

00:33:38

bank

00:33:40

regions and it’s into

00:33:42

those wastelands

00:33:43

that invader species can come and that’s

00:33:47

where the competition for new forms is most ferocious in a climaxed ecosystem

00:33:54

most mutations are lethal but in a in an open up for grabs environment like that mutations are not so frequently detrimental

00:34:08

that’s the notion behind the evolution of weeds

00:34:11

what weeds are are annual

00:34:15

plants which produce enormous amounts of seed

00:34:19

in a very opportunistic effort to

00:34:23

grab and hold as much unclaimed territory as possible.

00:34:29

In a climaxed rainforest, seeds are often huge, often produced intermittently,

00:34:38

and it’s a whole different psychology of dispersal.

00:34:43

Once human beings enter into the scene with burning and land clearing and this sort of psychology, of dispersal. Once human beings enter into the scene

00:34:46

with burning and land clearing and this sort of thing,

00:34:49

then we become the major force affecting plant speciation.

00:34:54

Unfortunately, this effect,

00:34:56

both by meandering rivers and human beings,

00:34:58

is to create a more, a lesser,

00:35:03

a lesser,

00:35:05

more annual,

00:35:08

more ephemeral kind of biotome.

00:35:11

Carl Sauer, the geographer, said

00:35:15

we found the planet a climaxed forest

00:35:18

and we will leave it a weedy lot.

00:35:22

That’s what he meant

00:35:24

about our impact on plant life

00:35:26

so this question

00:35:28

you know about our place

00:35:29

in the scheme of things

00:35:31

versus all the rest of life

00:35:33

it’s very clear that

00:35:35

one of the unique

00:35:36

things that is happening on the planet

00:35:39

is that the fate of all

00:35:41

life is becoming

00:35:44

hinged to the decisions made by a single species.

00:35:49

It’s though the concept of cultivation has at this point been extended to the entire planet,

00:35:57

and there’s even a fairly radical form of political philosophy

00:36:01

which would have you believe that we should take upon ourselves the role of

00:36:05

caretaker of the planet and what that means is extending the umbrella of human responsibility

00:36:11

over the entire biota what it means then if you’re an extraterrestrial standing off looking at all

00:36:19

this is that what is really going on on the planet is a gene swarm.

00:36:31

And, you know, the concept of species is extremely slippery at its boundaries when you start trying to talk about it with a population geneticist

00:36:36

or a molecular geneticist.

00:36:38

And really what’s happening is what the old biology called species

00:36:46

are really temporary nexus,

00:36:49

nexi of genetic associations

00:36:52

that on the scale of a million years

00:36:54

are extremely plastic, flowing, changing,

00:36:59

and at the viral level,

00:37:00

even mammalian genes are moving around.

00:37:03

Everything is in flux

00:37:05

so then

00:37:06

suspended at some position

00:37:10

in this matrix

00:37:11

to be determined by self-reflection

00:37:14

maybe, is our

00:37:16

species, which has

00:37:18

this peculiar

00:37:19

role of extending

00:37:22

control through the extension

00:37:24

of metaphor and technology. And we are somehow

00:37:33

now defining the process. And to this point, historical development has been unconscious.

00:37:41

I mean, the notion of a global civilization is probably less

00:37:45

than 30 years old as a fact it’s less than 10 years old the asymptotic rate at

00:37:53

which boundaries are being dissolved and databases are being fused is driving the

00:38:00

historical process now with a momentum that no institution or person can control

00:38:09

the amount of information, the amount of sheer data that’s being connected up.

00:38:17

I mean, I was thinking last night, for some reason, God knows why. I was thinking about a pioneer in the Ohio Valley in 1810 and how

00:38:31

this guy could talk to his wife or his three children and how now at home I can talk to

00:38:39

probably 500 million people in the world fairly easily by simply placing an international

00:38:45

telephone call. I can talk to that many people.

00:38:49

500 million, between 5 and 500 million

00:38:52

is I believe 6 orders of magnitude

00:38:54

of connection that has gone on.

00:38:58

Well, it’s astonishing

00:39:00

and it means that

00:39:02

we are running around basically with the reflexes best suited for bashing out the brains of reindeer.

00:39:11

This is what nature taught us to do. genie which we have summoned out of the dimensions of information

00:39:26

and chaos and complexity

00:39:28

that we have summoned

00:39:30

through the magic of civilization

00:39:32

has some kind

00:39:34

of autonomous

00:39:35

existence, some kind

00:39:38

of destiny

00:39:39

and it’s not clear whether

00:39:42

you know that organization is on some kind of quest for self-reflection and that it moves through the atomic, the molecular, the subcellular, the cellular, the organic, the cultural, the personal, if it’s that kind of thing, or if it’s actually something that we have, as it were, summoned from above.

00:40:09

I mean, this is back to these questions we talked about last night

00:40:12

of Gnostic versus whatever else is out there,

00:40:16

in terms of defining how we think about our relationship to the other

00:40:21

and how other we are.

00:40:23

I mean, if nature is the standard, then we are clearly the minions of the other and how other we are I mean if nature is the standard then we are

00:40:25

clearly you know the minions of the other you know no well summoned in this

00:40:31

in a sense of not so much dragged out but have triggered a descent of gnosis

00:40:39

into our species I mean we have like summoned a genie, the genie of symbolic activity,

00:40:47

cognitive understanding,

00:40:50

mathematical representation.

00:40:52

I mean, incredible tools

00:40:54

whose epistemic foundations

00:40:58

are not clearly understood,

00:41:00

even by modern people.

00:41:02

I mean, we do not know what numbers are

00:41:05

actually

00:41:06

and yet we have these relationships

00:41:09

to these things unquestioningly

00:41:12

that give us the ability to for instance

00:41:16

summon the light which burns

00:41:19

at the heart of stars

00:41:20

we can summon that down to our deserts

00:41:23

it’s a form of natural magic

00:41:27

I mean it’s eerie how

00:41:29

as natural magic abandoned

00:41:31

its pretense of a moral

00:41:33

universe

00:41:34

at the close of the 30 years war

00:41:38

it turned into

00:41:39

modern science

00:41:41

which you know with cold

00:41:44

gaze and a complete absence of any belief in spiritual hierarchy,

00:41:49

began to work one by one the miracles, you know, to summon the light which burns in the stars,

00:41:57

to change lead into gold, to plumb the mysteries of life itself.

00:42:03

But the price was a desouling

00:42:06

I mean you don’t have to be a Jungian

00:42:09

to understand what the message here is

00:42:12

I mean it’s the story of the golem

00:42:14

yes it’s Faustian

00:42:16

it’s somehow that the price of this understanding

00:42:19

is dis-ensouling

00:42:21

the understanding comes

00:42:23

but the soul and the understanding cannot exist autonomously,

00:42:28

which by a vicus mode of recirculation

00:42:31

is sort of what I wanted to mention today.

00:42:35

Well, yeah, I mean, one way that I’ve always thought about biology

00:42:41

is that, I mean, if you stand way off and look at biology

00:42:46

it’s a kind of

00:42:48

chemical system

00:42:50

for

00:42:51

amplifying quantum mechanical

00:42:54

indeterminacy

00:42:55

it’s a way of lifting

00:42:58

the indeterminacy at the

00:42:59

atomic level and transferring

00:43:02

it to the molecular level in the form

00:43:04

of charge transfer, resonance

00:43:06

rings, electron storage, and this sort of thing, and then raising it still further into

00:43:15

the macro-physical realm so that concepts like free choice, indeterminacy so forth and so on become real because apparently i mean obviously

00:43:27

thoughts which are the place where free will begins i will or will not do x thoughts are very

00:43:36

subtly uh channeled i don’t know if channeled is the word well, cascades of electrons

00:43:45

that what we’re talking about when we say

00:43:48

I will make my hand into a fist

00:43:51

and then it happens

00:43:53

is we’re talking about thought

00:43:55

becoming the initiator of physicality

00:44:00

of acts in the physical world

00:44:02

how this happens is completely unknown.

00:44:08

But I think indeterminacy, free choice,

00:44:10

the sense of controllable destiny,

00:44:14

all these things probably have to do with the fact

00:44:16

that the nature of living chemistry

00:44:21

is quantum mechanical,

00:44:23

and so it has these indeterminacies

00:44:26

built into it. It’s quite miraculous

00:44:29

and yet very neat.

00:44:32

Yes, right.

00:44:34

And exploding indeterminacy, I mean that seems to be

00:44:37

what is the magic of our existence

00:44:41

is that somehow we have pushed out

00:44:44

a bubble of indeterminacy in a macro-physical

00:44:48

space. I mean, people can say there is no free will, but there is the persistent experience

00:44:55

of the illusion of free will, which is, you know, I’ll take it so how this happens

00:45:06

and it apparently

00:45:07

is not really, well we don’t know

00:45:10

obviously but

00:45:11

it is not obviously happening

00:45:14

at the animal level

00:45:15

in the same way it’s happening for us

00:45:18

animals experience

00:45:19

a kind of eternal moment

00:45:22

of choice making

00:45:23

which also rides on this quantum indeterminacy.

00:45:27

But they don’t have a horizon of recall

00:45:30

or a set of forward-leading vectors based on the past,

00:45:36

or at least it’s assumed not.

00:45:38

The fact that we can symbolically communicate these things

00:45:42

is taken as proof of their presence in our organization

00:45:47

and absence in other, yeah.

00:45:51

What you’re saying is that on the atomic level is manifested just into this, and that the

00:45:58

expression of the, everything of the expression of the atomic level is kind of a mechanism

00:46:02

that’s expressed through it?

00:46:01

the expression of the atomic level as kind of a mechanism that’s expressed

00:46:03

through it? Well, the way

00:46:05

nature seems to work in most

00:46:07

systems is that it

00:46:09

a strategy which

00:46:12

works will be

00:46:13

repeated on different levels

00:46:16

at different scales.

00:46:18

This is the fractal thing that we were

00:46:20

talking about over here.

00:46:22

So

00:46:23

it’s a great question.

00:46:27

See, if there is not free will,

00:46:31

then thinking is meaningless.

00:46:35

Because if there is not free will,

00:46:37

you think what you think

00:46:38

because you couldn’t possibly think anything else.

00:46:42

So thinking is not an enterprise of any consequence

00:46:45

in a universe without free will.

00:46:48

Yet we have the persistent intuition

00:46:51

that thinking is of consequence.

00:46:54

Well, so then the question is,

00:46:56

our science tells us

00:46:58

that at the scale we’re living at,

00:47:00

everything is very highly determined

00:47:02

by like thermodynamics,

00:47:04

Newtonian physics, the

00:47:07

laws of mechanics, so forth and so on. And that we are, I mean, this is where Descartes

00:47:12

pushed it in this 18th century, that we are machines of some sort. Yet, you know, persistently

00:47:20

modernity insists that there is this existential residuum.

00:47:28

Well, then, if you’re going to try and explain it,

00:47:31

whatever that means in scientific terms,

00:47:36

then what you have to do is find a source of this kind of indeterminacy somewhere in the universe,

00:47:38

and then build a pipeline, an ideological pipeline,

00:47:41

where you can pipe it from there to where you need it.

00:47:44

Okay, so where you need it.

00:47:49

Okay, so where we need it is in modern sociology and psychology,

00:47:52

and where we have it is in quantum physics.

00:47:56

So a lot of people are trying to build a pipeline to bring it over here and dump it here, and then it will do wonderful things

00:47:58

for our modeling of the living state.

00:48:02

But I, you know, this is all fine to talk about this,

00:48:05

but I warn you, this is not my forte

00:48:09

nor my favorite thing,

00:48:10

because I think it’s very cut off

00:48:12

from the felt presence of immediate experience.

00:48:19

That’s what’s missing from all that we’ve been

00:48:22

kind of tap-in-thing around this

00:48:24

since we started this discussion about what is our relationship with nature and the earth.

00:48:30

I mean, in a way, maybe it’s just such an obvious thing.

00:48:33

Everybody here just already thinks this and nobody wants to say it.

00:48:37

But, I mean, I think it’s obvious that human beings are in some kind of unique situation on the earth,

00:48:45

either by design or their own will or something.

00:48:49

But we still have this sticky problem of what to do about.

00:48:53

We’re here on the Earth now with the animals and the plants,

00:48:56

and in a way, isn’t the de-soul condition that we’re in,

00:49:03

isn’t that what really a lot of what you’re

00:49:06

interested in is supposed to address?

00:49:08

I mean, isn’t that what psychedelics are supposed to address?

00:49:10

What is our relationship with nature?

00:49:12

It’s sort of something that you just need to

00:49:14

we need to

00:49:16

re-get, we have to

00:49:17

get back in touch with that

00:49:19

in some real immediate way that we

00:49:21

don’t have to think about almost

00:49:23

or philosophize about but we just are a part of this matrix.

00:49:28

And then we can really figure out where we go

00:49:30

in this Faustian pact that we’ve made and so forth.

00:49:34

Do we go to the stars?

00:49:36

But I don’t think we’re going anywhere until we get this relationship

00:49:38

figured out with what to do with the earth and nature,

00:49:42

our relationship with it.

00:49:44

Well, on one level, it’s an act of attention.

00:49:48

It’s not like an ideology.

00:49:50

It’s simply a shift of attention so that we watch it.

00:49:55

I mean, your question is broad.

00:49:57

It ranges from the most practical questions of population politics,

00:50:03

demography, insurance and tax

00:50:06

policies, this kind of thing

00:50:08

to

00:50:09

you know

00:50:12

basically how shall

00:50:14

we design the destiny of the race

00:50:16

kind of questions

00:50:17

probably every civilization

00:50:20

that has gone through a twilight

00:50:22

has had groups

00:50:24

of concerned comfortable people who have met in rooms to decry the approaching catastrophe.

00:50:33

You know, I’m sure that when Rome fell, there were people who said, you know, we see what it is.

00:50:40

The bad tax policies, the barbarians at the border, these religious cults.

00:50:45

It’s just not safe to walk the streets anymore.

00:50:49

And yet fell she did.

00:50:52

And this always happens.

00:50:54

So I don’t know.

00:50:56

It bothers me to think that we could perhaps trigger.

00:51:00

See, what’s most fragile is democratic values.

00:51:04

See, what’s most fragile is democratic values.

00:51:11

And I’m pretty confident that the human race is going to survive in some form or another.

00:51:20

But all we have to do is hit one speed bump and democratic values, which are already under tremendous assault, will just go down the drain. You must have all seen a few weeks ago in the New York Times the article about how

00:51:27

FAO or somebody issued this report that the world food supply has now fallen behind the world food

00:51:34

demand. And, you know, this long demographic article littered with equations and statistics,

00:51:41

but what it’s saying is, you know, build into your model of the world

00:51:46

millions of people starving every year

00:51:48

in various places

00:51:50

as politicians manipulate

00:51:52

and move food supplies around

00:51:55

because forced agriculture

00:51:57

is failing around the world

00:51:58

and so forth and so on.

00:52:00

When does it become moral, for example,

00:52:02

for governments to, say,

00:52:04

pay women not to have children?

00:52:06

I mean, this is the…

00:52:07

It’s a moot point because you have…

00:52:10

You mean they’ve already tried.

00:52:12

In Singapore they have, yes.

00:52:14

They had tax advantage.

00:52:15

Yes, well, mostly what they try in Singapore they succeed with.

00:52:19

But Singapore is a perfect example.

00:52:21

Singapore is a beige fascism.

00:52:23

You know, they don’t burn books and wear

00:52:26

funny uniforms, but

00:52:27

the result is the same.

00:52:30

Right now we’re quite literally

00:52:32

paying people to have children

00:52:33

in a tax-incentive government structure,

00:52:36

church-sponsored.

00:52:38

That is the posture of our civilization

00:52:40

at the moment.

00:52:41

But see, you would have to refight the wars

00:52:44

of the 17th century because what you would have to refight the wars of the 17th

00:52:45

century because what you would have to do

00:52:47

is say no social institution

00:52:49

period can

00:52:51

promulgate policies

00:52:53

which are genocidal

00:52:55

or racially suicidal

00:52:57

and then you would have to arrest

00:52:59

the Pope and

00:53:00

proceed along those lines

00:53:03

and

00:53:03

what? that’s coming up on the time wave and proceed along those lines. What?

00:53:09

That’s coming up on the time wave in the Enlightenment.

00:53:11

Arresting the Pope.

00:53:15

Well, you heard it here first, folks.

00:53:19

The cultural thing that’s happening there is interesting.

00:53:22

The Internet is becoming the network.

00:53:26

I mean, there is a globalization of a single computer network.

00:53:30

And so what do you say to people who ask the simple question,

00:53:32

what if it’s evil?

00:53:35

We don’t have a choice.

00:53:37

We don’t have a choice. What a great answer to that question.

00:53:44

The only possible answer to that question. The only possible

00:53:46

answer to that question.

00:53:49

The answer to the will

00:53:51

is so much baggage.

00:53:53

But the concept of psychedelic awareness is not.

00:53:56

We can be quite conscious of the process.

00:53:58

But the idea that we can,

00:54:00

that we, I, me,

00:54:01

can individually manifest a significant

00:54:04

difference to it by choice?

00:54:08

Well, but that’s an interesting question.

00:54:11

The fact that you can’t do it, the fact that you can’t affect that dimension

00:54:17

may mean that that’s not the dimension you should be trying to affect.

00:54:22

In other words, part of what’s

00:54:26

going on, I think, is a retreat

00:54:27

to immediacy.

00:54:30

I will next week

00:54:32

get on

00:54:34

the internet,

00:54:35

but I found your question

00:54:37

amusing because I loathe people

00:54:40

who ask if you’re on the internet.

00:54:42

I went through this with fax

00:54:44

machines six years ago,

00:54:45

and finally the whining just reached such a level.

00:54:50

They said, all right, we will get the dedicated fax line.

00:54:55

And yes, next week we will be on the internet,

00:54:59

but with no sense of joy.

00:55:02

And since we have no choice as you inform

00:55:06

me, what difference does it matter

00:55:08

whether I like it or

00:55:09

don’t like it, it just has to

00:55:12

be done

00:55:12

I would say

00:55:16

you know, I have an observation

00:55:18

the thing is it seems like

00:55:19

as more complex the communication

00:55:21

as more trivial is most of

00:55:24

the communication

00:55:24

well, but that doesn’t mean As more complex the communication network, as more trivial is most of the communication.

00:55:27

Well, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t also a rising percentage

00:55:30

of profound communication.

00:55:32

I mean, yes, when everything is being communicated,

00:55:34

99% of it will be garbage.

00:55:36

Nevertheless, when everything is communicated,

00:55:39

100% of the good stuff will be being communicated.

00:55:43

We just need more good stuff.

00:55:46

Huh? We just need more good stuff. Well, what we need are filters

00:55:48

and navigational devices

00:55:50

and…

00:55:51

Who’s going to sort out the 1%?

00:55:54

Well, you’re going to buy software

00:55:56

that is tailored to your needs

00:55:58

or not tailored to your needs, depending

00:56:00

on whether you’re a chump or not.

00:56:02

That’s the thing.

00:56:03

I mean, I don’t have the capacity to solve it out.

00:56:07

Well, then you’re dead on arrival.

00:56:10

This is the new order.

00:56:13

You have no choice.

00:56:17

Whatever it was.

00:56:22

Okay, all right.

00:56:25

Go for it.

00:56:26

We didn’t grow our own brains as human beings,

00:56:31

so maybe we’re not growing our own global brain.

00:56:36

Yeah, the point about all this is,

00:56:39

and the only reason there is any hope,

00:56:41

is because the macro process that’s going on

00:56:47

is not under the control of human planners or institutions, thank God.

00:56:52

If it were, it would be as big a botch as everything else.

00:56:56

But it is not under the control of human planners and institutions.

00:57:01

It is biological, not cultural.

00:57:05

This is what has not been understood about history,

00:57:08

is that the past million years,

00:57:11

the big headlines have been biological

00:57:15

and behavioral slash organizational.

00:57:20

The software, which is languages, religions, cultures,

00:57:23

systems of magic, mathematics, engineering schemas, heresies, magic, so forth, well, all that is ephemeral.

00:57:35

And there hasn’t been a major shift in behavior slash organization since the rise of perspective.

00:57:44

But that’s only 500 to 600 years in the past.

00:57:49

Now something else is happening.

00:57:52

And the sensory biases and technological biases

00:57:56

that permitted the evolution

00:57:59

of the post-medieval democratic individual,

00:58:03

the citizen, the worker,

00:58:07

taxpayer,

00:58:09

all that is now the field of focus is moving beyond it.

00:58:16

Something else is happening.

00:58:18

Everything is being recast.

00:58:20

And we, each of us, as we imbibe the medium of the culture

00:58:25

keep trying on

00:58:27

the latest adumbration

00:58:30

of modernity that is

00:58:32

consistent with what we can put up with

00:58:34

you know, so so and so

00:58:36

decides to have reconstructive

00:58:38

cosmetic surgery, somebody else

00:58:40

decides not to, somebody else

00:58:42

decides they’ll go with the tattoo

00:58:44

but not the nipple piercing somebody else decides not to. Somebody else decides they’ll go with the tattoo, but not the nipple piercing.

00:58:46

Somebody else decides, you know,

00:58:48

Armani is okay, Gucci is out.

00:58:51

What this is, is, you know,

00:58:53

shedding and scaling of cultural self-image

00:58:58

controlled by the individual

00:59:00

in a relationship of capital expenditure

00:59:03

to monolithic images

00:59:05

that are being projected down

00:59:07

through the sociological control mechanism.

00:59:10

All the means are there

00:59:12

in the matrix of information between human beings

00:59:14

or they’re being put in place anyway.

00:59:17

That’s fine and good,

00:59:18

but what hasn’t happened yet

00:59:21

is we haven’t been resold.

00:59:23

That’s right.

00:59:24

Since we’ve been desold, that’s where we’ve been.

00:59:26

Well, see, there is no percentage now in educating us

00:59:30

because as Marx, which is what we all are,

00:59:34

we are easier to manipulate, easier to fleece.

00:59:38

It’s easier to get an idiot to join a book club

00:59:41

than it is to get an intelligent person to join a book club than it is to get an intelligent person to join a book club

00:59:45

this is an interesting equation

00:59:48

then for the American publishing

00:59:50

industry you see

00:59:51

and all other of these

00:59:54

voluntary participations

00:59:56

in the market economy

00:59:58

so it’s about

01:00:00

reclaiming

01:00:03

immediate

01:00:04

experience and retracting fetishism,

01:00:09

which relates to addiction and all this other stuff.

01:00:11

Because what’s happened is a social system, a virus, has gotten loose

01:00:17

that is actually not symbiotic, but ultimately will kill off the the host and we are the host i mean you know lenin

01:00:28

said when it comes time to hang the capitalists they’ll sell us new rope and this is true

01:00:36

they’re lenin’s gone but we are still you know digging the ground from beneath our feet

01:00:42

because of this object fetishism,

01:00:47

which is a form of addiction,

01:00:48

which comes out of, you know,

01:00:50

our dysfunctional relationship to our prehistory.

01:00:55

I think so.

01:00:56

And then there are two ways to approach doing something about it.

01:01:00

One, to go cold turkey,

01:01:02

to try and just cure it by, I suppose, psychedelic drugs and massive applications of a different point of view, or to try and mediate it by analyzing, this would be the methadone approach, to try and figure out, you know, what is it about this fetishism and how

01:01:25

much of it can be satisfied without killing ourselves? And this is where you get the virtual

01:01:31

reality enthusiasts, because they’re saying, you know, object fetishism is not detrimental to the

01:01:39

earth if the objects are made of light. In other words, the problem is the physicality of the fetish itself.

01:01:47

If you can make the fetish out of light,

01:01:51

well, in a sense, we have this, though.

01:01:53

We have hundreds of millions of people being warehoused by television

01:01:58

where they live, you know, toxic, low-awareness lives,

01:02:02

semi-preserved by food preservatives

01:02:05

and low levels of ionizing radiation,

01:02:09

and they live in great arcologies

01:02:14

where everybody is turned to a different…

01:02:17

Yes?

01:02:17

What a waste of intelligence.

01:02:19

Well, on the other hand,

01:02:20

do you want these people driving around

01:02:22

and crowding the malls

01:02:24

and waiting in lines in front of you in restaurants?

01:02:27

If all these people ever…

01:02:29

Walking down virtual shopping malls.

01:02:31

Exactly.

01:02:32

So, I don’t know.

01:02:34

It’s a great age for intelligence because there’s so little of it.

01:02:53

The nature of the game is to deprogram from all of these systems of images that are being handed down. And then, you know, to make your way like a pilgrim with eyes open across a new landscape, which is not a very pretty landscape because you know western civilization is in the

01:03:05

act of a slow motion train wreck that’s what’s going on at the end of uh of the millennium

01:03:11

because you know what are you going to do what’s the alternative well the main the only alternative

01:03:17

i’ve found is to yak about it and to you know a kind of hasidic complaining is good.

01:03:29

And just never shut up.

01:03:36

What’s happening now is there is so much understanding running around at the service of capitalism, but it’s all micromanaged.

01:03:39

Somebody has a technology for making a better chip.

01:03:42

Somebody has a better, faster switch.

01:03:47

a technology for making a better chip somebody has a better faster switch but nobody can extrapolate what is the consequence of all of this stuff at once and it has there are emergent properties

01:03:54

so that no one can actually predict the direction that the culture is moving in and the cone of

01:04:01

projection is actually shortening not lengthening as uncertainty

01:04:06

is crowding into the system as more and more factors begin to arrive i mean we don’t know

01:04:12

where it could come from it could come from superconductivity or cold fusion or charge transfer

01:04:18

or you know and at any moment some technique, or piece of information could arrive,

01:04:26

which will just confound the entire situation.

01:04:30

I think that psychedelics are this.

01:04:33

That, you know, what physics was for the 20th century,

01:04:39

pharmacology and psychedelic travel, or whatever,

01:04:42

and psychedelic travel or whatever

01:04:43

will be for however much

01:04:45

of the 21st century exists

01:04:47

before we’re sucked

01:04:48

into the infundibulum

01:04:50

because it is,

01:04:54

at last,

01:04:55

we have understood.

01:04:56

See, I mean,

01:04:57

the way science proceeds,

01:04:58

which is somewhat reasonable,

01:05:00

is by dealing with

01:05:01

the simple questions first.

01:05:04

You know,

01:05:04

what is a falling ball?

01:05:07

What is an inclined plane?

01:05:08

Simple questions first.

01:05:10

Now, reductionism has essentially come to the end of its road with matter.

01:05:17

The canceling of the superconducting supercollider.

01:05:21

Did you read the descriptions of how to go to the level where they could test the theory

01:05:28

they would need a superconducting supercollider a thousand

01:05:31

kilometers around and then to go to the next

01:05:36

order of magnitude to test the final level of the theory

01:05:39

a superconducting supercollider the size of the solar system

01:05:44

well these things are not going to be built.

01:05:47

So what it means is that this path

01:05:51

proceeding from the Greeks for 2,500 years

01:05:54

has now come to an end

01:05:57

with a handful of quarks.

01:06:00

You know, that’s what you’ve got.

01:06:02

And, you know, mountains of equation

01:06:04

and many careers

01:06:05

and all those conferences in Zurich and in Italy

01:06:08

and chasing women around in Stockholm

01:06:11

and all that business, that happened.

01:06:15

What’s now, it’s understood that the really interesting energies

01:06:20

go on at probably less than that of an ordinary triple-A flashlight battery,

01:06:27

and that everything goes on in the near domain, specifically the biology of this planet,

01:06:36

even more pointedly, the neocortex of the higher primate man. This is where the action is. And

01:06:43

primate man. This is where the action is.

01:06:47

And science is possible in the neocortex,

01:06:52

but it’s much more like shamanism because it’s a phenomenological science, meaning it bases itself on observation

01:06:56

like 19th century botany or something,

01:07:00

and what you send is simply the intelligent

01:07:03

mind. It’s not about long base interferometry

01:07:08

radio telescopes and all these instrumentalities

01:07:12

the instrumentality of psychopharmacology

01:07:16

lies in the laboratory

01:07:17

but the field work of psychopharmacology

01:07:22

lies right here

01:07:24

and I made it my business of psychopharmacology lies, you know, right here. And I, you know,

01:07:27

I made it my business

01:07:29

to attend to what has been accomplished

01:07:32

by the Western mind.

01:07:34

And then I made it my business

01:07:36

to explore some of the wilder frontiers

01:07:42

of pharmacology.

01:07:43

And the news I bring back to the

01:07:46

best of my ability is

01:07:48

that great confoundment

01:07:50

lies ahead I mean you can run

01:07:52

those wild horses over that

01:07:54

cliff anytime

01:07:55

it’s

01:07:56

it’s a

01:08:00

moot point as to whether western

01:08:02

science can survive

01:08:04

the encounter with these things.

01:08:07

And, you know, it’s only been about a hundred years.

01:08:11

Lewis Lewin went to Cincinnati and brought peyote back to Berlin in 1888 and began his extraction processes.

01:08:35

It’s been a hundred years that this peculiar ethnological complex of the aboriginal people at the fringes of great civilizations has been deposited on our plate.

01:08:41

And for most of that time, it’s either been ignored or illegal or both.

01:08:45

And so we don’t, we have not finished with this.

01:08:48

And people like ourselves,

01:08:52

what we represent is an intuitionally driven underground of people who have found this

01:08:55

to have some positive or fascinating impact

01:09:00

on our own lives,

01:09:02

but we are not an ideology or a field of study. I mean, some of us are

01:09:10

simply thrill seekers, some of us are pharmacologists, some of us ethnologists,

01:09:16

some botanists, psychologists, artists, everybody has a different angle, but the thing has not annealed into a coherent understanding

01:09:26

the self

01:09:28

the ego

01:09:30

is the crowning

01:09:32

achievement of western civilization

01:09:34

it also is sinking

01:09:36

the rowboat

01:09:37

and what this stuff

01:09:40

represents is an antidote

01:09:42

but this is a

01:09:44

cultural war of such

01:09:46

fierceness and fury

01:09:47

because people are going

01:09:49

to be mighty agitated

01:09:51

when they realize

01:09:53

what cultural transformation really means

01:09:56

it means you can’t take it with you

01:09:58

it means you can’t take you

01:09:59

with you

01:10:00

and the issue

01:10:04

of surrender in a dominator

01:10:06

society is very

01:10:07

major, that’s why these psychedelics

01:10:10

are so

01:10:10

politically hot

01:10:13

because the ego

01:10:15

for all of its bluster

01:10:17

is a very fragilly established

01:10:19

thing

01:10:20

and every wind that blows

01:10:23

carries a certain threat to it

01:10:25

well

01:10:27

if you fully

01:10:30

assimilate the time wave

01:10:32

theory I think the part that

01:10:34

colors immediate experience

01:10:35

is the resonances

01:10:37

because

01:10:39

it’s sort of

01:10:42

hard to explain but

01:10:43

for instance

01:10:45

in James Joyce’s Ulysses

01:10:47

the way he organizes it

01:10:49

is on one level this is a book about a guy

01:10:51

trying to buy some kidneys

01:10:52

to fry for breakfast

01:10:54

and wandering around his neighborhood

01:10:56

waiting for the meat store to open

01:10:59

and having all these things go on

01:11:00

on one level it’s that

01:11:02

on another level it’s the Trojan War and the

01:11:05

peregrinations of Odysseus

01:11:07

in the eastern Mediterranean.

01:11:09

And then there are several other levels.

01:11:11

Well, everything gives

01:11:14

off

01:11:14

vibrations

01:11:17

of its metaphorical or

01:11:19

analogical relationship to

01:11:21

similar situations in the past.

01:11:24

This is a kind of literalizing of the shell

01:11:26

drake Ian morphogenetic field so let’s take an obvious and easy example a person any person

01:11:35

their face their gesture is an obviously a resonance of their grandfather their great

01:11:42

grandmother they’re saying all of these genetic concatenations are coming together we understand that because it’s a material metaphor

01:11:51

and relational but everybody i don’t really believe in reincarnation in the ordinary sense

01:11:59

but i do believe that we are interference patterns of effects created by people who existed in the

01:12:08

past and the future and you can see it you know i see a lot of people and i at least i think i do

01:12:17

sometimes i think it’s just the same 250 being moved ahead of me on trucks at night.

01:12:27

But I’m not sure.

01:12:33

But people give off these resonances of past time,

01:12:36

and situations give them off.

01:12:38

You know, cities.

01:12:42

I mean, it’s not so true in America where everything is young,

01:12:46

but in Europe, if you know where you are, then you usually know several things scattered along a time chain about where you are, you know, what was

01:12:53

going on in the 4th century, the 9th century, the 16th, and the 19th. And this is a way of seeing,

01:13:01

I mean, this is really there, this is is in everything this is just an extension of intuition

01:13:07

where you actually

01:13:09

see a wider

01:13:11

spectrum of time

01:13:13

in people, in their faces

01:13:16

one thing that the time wave

01:13:19

says is that there are

01:13:22

clots of novelty

01:13:27

in a medium of otherwise less novel stuff

01:13:33

of some sort, a probabilistic medium.

01:13:36

And a person, a galaxy, a person, a book

01:13:43

are nexies of novelty

01:13:46

floating along in this less novel medium

01:13:50

and these things come together and go apart

01:13:52

but specifically people

01:13:54

are persistent nexii of novelty

01:13:58

and obviously there is a boundary of complexity

01:14:01

at my skin surface

01:14:03

I mean an inch in it’s a very different place than an inch out,

01:14:08

as far as I’m concerned.

01:14:11

I had read an article recently that talked about how the vocabulary of,

01:14:18

say, like a 14-year-old today has decreased significantly in the last 30 years

01:14:25

to the point of like they were saying today, I think it was about,

01:14:30

the average 14-year-old has a vocabulary of about 10,000 words

01:14:33

as opposed to about 26,000 words about 30 years ago.

01:14:38

And I was wondering what your thoughts were about that.

01:14:44

If you thought it was a manifestation of we’re moving into this realm

01:14:47

of being able to communicate better without actually having to verbalize these things,

01:14:53

or are we moving toward the 1984 version of hell where we’re cutting back on our ways?

01:15:01

The problem is that we’re moving in both directions at once.

01:15:05

I mean, what’s happening is that the society is beginning to stretch its upper and lower boundaries.

01:15:14

You can now fall farther and climb higher than you ever could before.

01:15:20

I mean, if you screw up in this society, you could find yourself living under a bridge

01:15:25

quickly. If, on the other hand, you know, the dice rolled a different way for you,

01:15:32

you know, you could be sleeping with Madonna tomorrow.

01:15:40

You’re listening to The Psychedelic Salon, where people are changing their lives one thought at a time.

01:15:48

Well, I really hate to have Terrence’s last thought for today to be about sleeping with Madonna, but that’s where the tape ended.

01:15:57

But if you’re one of our younger salonners, I don’t want you to let that gross you out just because, well, McDonough was a lot younger back then, as we all were.

01:16:07

Anyway, we just heard Terence McKenna and a few friends back in February of 1994

01:16:12

talking about the good, the bad, and the ugly potential of this new technology called the Internet.

01:16:19

At the time he was making these comments, I was the project lead for a group

01:16:23

that ultimately became the first Internet and Java development group for a company that’s now called Verizon.

01:16:31

So I know that I was already well into what at the time was not much more than a curiosity to everybody above the middle management in the world’s telecommunications companies.

01:16:42

It was really an uphill battle to get the budgets we

01:16:45

needed to build out the net to where it is today. And so I have to admit that I was quite pleasantly

01:16:51

surprised to hear how up to speed Terrence and his group were about what was going on with the

01:16:57

internet, even though Terrence didn’t seem to be all that happy about it. Remember this?

01:17:02

all that happy about it. Remember this?

01:17:04

I will next week

01:17:05

get on the internet

01:17:08

but with no sense of

01:17:10

joy. Now if you

01:17:12

go back and re-listen to the

01:17:13

full soundbite, you’ll also hear

01:17:16

the part that I cut out where he said

01:17:17

I loathe people who ask if I’m

01:17:20

on the internet.

01:17:22

But of course just before that he

01:17:23

also said that the following week he was going to get on the net himself.

01:17:27

So I think that we can perhaps come to the conclusion that it was sometime

01:17:32

around March of 1994 that Terence McKenna first

01:17:36

jacked into the net. Somehow that little factoid has to work

01:17:40

its way into fiction someday. I might even do that myself.

01:17:47

Now can you quickly tell me how many different topics were touched on in this little get-together session? As I keep pointing out,

01:17:53

this was all ad lib. Terrence had no idea of what questions would be coming his way.

01:17:59

And yet, if you go back and listen again, keeping in mind that this is all coming off the top of

01:18:04

his head,

01:18:09

I think you’ll have to agree with me that Terrence McKenna had a truly unique mind.

01:18:15

And I just can’t pass up the opportunity to again say something positive about the game Minecraft. Terrence was just now talking about object fetishism and how it wouldn’t be so bad

01:18:22

if the objects were made of light.

01:18:29

Well, yesterday afternoon, after I brought my granddaughter home from school at noon,

01:18:34

I told her that I finally broke down and put Minecraft on our new Kindle tablet.

01:18:40

And the first thing that she said was, I want to build the first world on it, which she then proceeded to do.

01:18:41

And within an hour, you would be blown away by the world that she built.

01:18:46

Not only a couple of houses, but pens with various livestock milling around in them,

01:18:51

and a railroad that you could ride for what seemed like miles around this part of the

01:18:55

nearly infinite world of Minecraft. You know, I’ve spent some time myself trying to do a few

01:19:02

simple things in Minecraft, but the things I do are childishly primitive

01:19:07

compared to what my little five-year-old granddaughter created just yesterday afternoon.

01:19:12

And she did it all with light.

01:19:15

And for now, this is Lorenzo, signing off from Cyberdelic Space.

01:19:20

Be well, my friends.