Program Notes

Guest speakers: Ann Shulgin and Dr. William Rowlandson

“If you are going to experiment with a psychedelic of any kind, make sure you are depranil-free for at least five days, probably seven would be safer.”
-Ann Shulgin

“You don’t really need MDMA or a psychedelic to do [deep personal therapy]. … I think that until at least some of these materials become legal, don’t dismiss the possibilities of hypnotherapy doing exactly what you need and want.”
-Ann Shulgin

“As far as I’m concerned, there is no substitute for MDMA, because it is the insight drug. And it does this magical combination of allowing you to see inside without fear and hostility toward yourself. It has a beautiful, beautiful effect, and no other drug that we know of so far manages to do that.”
-Ann Shulgin

“[Our] paradox is the ceaseless, constant drive to understand something that is inherently un-understandable. Now, of course, the paradox lies in the fact that we understand it is not to be understood, and yet we understand that we continue to try to understand. It’s a beautiful paradox.”
- Dr. William Rowlandson

2CT-7 Survey by Casey Hardison

Previous Episode

273 - Indigenous Plant Wisdom

Next Episode

275 - The Varieties of Psychedelic Experience

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

Greetings from cyberdelic space.

00:00:20

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:25

And you may be wondering where I’ve been these past three weeks, but, well, I wish there

00:00:30

was some kind of an exciting tale to tell you, but the truth is that I’ve just been

00:00:34

sort of lounging in the land of lethargy.

00:00:37

In other words, I’ve just been goofing off, kind of pretending that I’m on a summer vacation

00:00:43

at the beach and doing a lot of reading and not much else.

00:00:46

As I’ve said before, I want these podcasts to be something that I do for fun

00:00:51

and not because I feel like I have to do one each week.

00:00:54

So now I’m refreshed and ready to have some more fun with you here in the salon once again.

00:01:01

But while I’ve been goofing off, some of our fellow salonners have been

00:01:04

kind of nudging me

00:01:06

back to the world by either buying a copy of my pay-what-you-can novel, The Genesis Generation,

00:01:12

or by making direct donations to the salon. And yes, I guess that my childhood years in Catholic

00:01:19

school have still left a trace of guilt in me, and I’ve begun to feel guilty about not getting around to thanking what has turned out to be a lot of our fellow salonners who were worried that

00:01:30

the podcasts were going away. But never fear, I’m planning on keeping these things going for

00:01:35

at least through the end of 2013 or so. In fact, as a sign of good faith, I’m not going to thank

00:01:41

all of the donors from the past three weeks right now. Instead, I’m going to put out another podcast tomorrow, sort of a double album podcast or

00:01:50

something, and I’ll thank the rest of you then. So thanks for the support goes out to the following

00:01:56

people who kind of gave me a boost to get back into podcasting mode. And these fine souls are Graham W., Chris T., Eric S., Sophia N., Stella Luna, Lee M., Dylan H., Dominic B., Mark M.,

00:02:15

and to longtime listeners, Robert and Roby, or it could be Robin.

00:02:19

And I’m not complaining about your handwriting, Robin.

00:02:23

It’s still orders of magnitude better than mine

00:02:25

so I hope I got that kind of right

00:02:27

and also one more big thank you goes out to a fellow salonner from Canada

00:02:31

who sent a note that really gave me a rush

00:02:34

because he signed it with his first name and last initial

00:02:38

which are Joe H

00:02:40

and that was how my dad was known when he was still alive

00:02:44

so hey Joe, thanks a

00:02:45

lot for both the donation and for the feel-good moment your letter gave me when I saw Joe

00:02:50

H. there. And now, as they say, let’s get on with the show. Today I’m going to play

00:02:57

two talks that I’ve wanted to get out to you for a while, but just never seem to get around

00:03:01

to them. The first talk I’m going to play right now is somewhat of an informal session

00:03:07

and more of a question-and-answer session, I guess,

00:03:10

that Ann Shulgin led just after one of Sasha’s talks

00:03:13

at the 2001 Entheobotany Conference in Palenque, Mexico.

00:03:18

As you’ll hear, the Palenque sessions were generally small, informal,

00:03:23

and full of interesting information,

00:03:26

much of which came from the audience.

00:03:28

Unfortunately, very little of the audience comments were clear enough in the recording to include in this podcast,

00:03:35

as the recording was done on the little cassette recorder that Matt Palamary had with him at the time.

00:03:40

And, hey, thanks again for the recording, Mateo.

00:03:43

at the time, and hey, thanks again for the recording, Mateo.

00:03:50

So, I had to cut out some of the audience parts where I couldn’t amplify them satisfactorily,

00:03:54

and if you happen to be one of the people whose words of wisdom didn’t make it into this program, and you were at that workshop, well, you’re in somewhat good company, as

00:04:00

I’ve even edited my own kind of long-winded contribution out of this talk as well.

00:04:05

But in the case of my comments, you can trust me,

00:04:08

you aren’t really missing anything of importance.

00:04:11

And so now let’s rewind our clocks a little more than 10 years

00:04:15

and go back and join Ann Shulgin and a few of us

00:04:18

having a conversation about psychedelic safety, among other interesting topics.

00:04:23

psychedelic safety, among other interesting topics.

00:04:30

Is to share experiences, for you to share experiences that might be of help to other people.

00:04:34

We’ll bring up questions about states of consciousness,

00:04:37

whether drug-assisted or not.

00:04:44

Questions that someone else might have answers to,

00:04:48

and no subject, as far as I’m concerned, is too weird.

00:04:53

I personally am interested in lucid dreaming

00:04:58

and in the whole UFO phenomenon

00:05:03

and just about everything else involving human consciousness. and in the whole UFO phenomenon,

00:05:08

and just about everything else involving human consciousness.

00:05:14

To be fair to everybody, it would be a nice idea if you can keep your story,

00:05:20

whatever you want to call it, to about five minutes,

00:05:24

because otherwise a few people will have all the time and some people will get no time.

00:05:31

Discussion, however, is unlimited time.

00:05:37

The first thing, oh yeah, if you feel a little hesitant to claim that a certain thing happened to you,

00:05:46

then you can always use the favorite Internet expression of, you know, FOAF,

00:05:52

a friend of a friend had this happen.

00:05:55

It doesn’t matter.

00:05:58

There is one thing I’d like to talk about briefly.

00:06:03

It came up last night last year for the first time

00:06:09

we had one person who experienced this unexpected a side effect and this year I

00:06:20

think one or two others had the same thing happen last night.

00:06:31

Last year, there was a compound that was floating around called 2CT7.

00:06:40

And everybody had about approximately the same dosage level.

00:06:43

Everybody seemed to want to, almost everybody seemed to want to try it.

00:06:48

A very successful, except for one person who’s not here this year,

00:06:52

who had a terribly hard time.

00:06:56

He almost collapsed up at the ruins,

00:07:03

and it took far longer for him to get back to baseline than it should have.

00:07:06

It was extremely intense, very uncomfortable.

00:07:11

And we couldn’t figure out what had happened until he happened.

00:07:15

We asked him what drugs in general he took,

00:07:23

and he was one of those people who had gotten into so-called smart drugs.

00:07:26

It turned out that he was taking daily Deprinil.

00:07:36

And we concluded that the Deprinil was the problem.

00:07:44

Now, this year, Sasha and I didn’t know who was taking anything, if anything,

00:07:47

until after they’d taken it. And at least two people came up to us and made clear that they were not only having an extremely intense experience, but it was too intense.

00:08:01

It was too intense.

00:08:06

It had been going on far longer than this particular drug,

00:08:10

which shall remain unnamed because it’s not legal.

00:08:15

This is a relatively short-acting psychedelic, and a couple of them had been going for 8, 10 hours,

00:08:21

which is very unusual.

00:08:23

I was not comfortable.

00:08:24

It was obviously an overdose.

00:08:26

One of them turned out to have been a user of Deprinil

00:08:29

as part of his daily vitamin supplement stuff,

00:08:33

and I very much suspect the second one was also doing that.

00:08:38

So I would suggest,

00:08:42

I told Sasha that this information should go out immediately onto Erwin and those sites.

00:08:48

And he said it probably already is.

00:08:51

But nobody’s been paying enough attention.

00:08:55

I think the rule should probably be, for those of us who are not chemists,

00:09:00

I don’t know whether we’re taking a phenethylamine or what,

00:09:05

that if you are going to experiment with a psychedelic of any kind,

00:09:11

make sure you are Depronil-free for at least five days.

00:09:17

Probably seven would be safer.

00:09:20

Now, has anybody here had this kind of experience?

00:09:24

Now has anybody here had this kind of experience?

00:09:32

Anyone here using Deprinil has discovered this particular effect?

00:09:36

So actually the Deprinil are the same, just different names,

00:09:38

and some people know one and the other.

00:09:41

And then the programizers and others available in Mexico and an MAO inhibitor that people use to potentiate.

00:09:45

The idea of potentiating

00:09:48

it sounds all fine, except that

00:09:50

I’ve yet to come across anyone that this

00:09:52

happened to who was enjoying it.

00:09:54

Well, you can mix those phenylethylates

00:09:56

and certain things or else you get into trouble.

00:09:58

You use it with tryptamines

00:10:00

and you have to be careful how you do it.

00:10:03

Alright,

00:10:04

well, would it be sensible just to say that maybe it’s better

00:10:08

if you’re taking Depronil to drop the Depronil for five days?

00:10:13

Okay, yeah, that’s a good warning.

00:10:16

And I’m sure it must be on these various sites,

00:10:20

but if you find out that it isn’t,

00:10:22

please take the responsibility of making

00:10:25

sure that the sites concerned with psychedelic drugs do have that information, because it

00:10:31

can be rather unpleasant.

00:10:34

I don’t know if the audience includes people who are having trouble.

00:10:40

Probably not.

00:10:41

I assume that there are no effect after effects of any kind

00:10:47

because last year the gentleman who was having all that trouble was perfectly fine the next day

00:10:52

but it’s not the happiest experience um okay i’m going to bring up the first

00:11:00

uh the first subject which has come up with several people

00:11:05

and it comes up every year and I don’t have an answer

00:11:09

myself but I think it might be a good idea for

00:11:13

especially the therapists to perhaps

00:11:17

try to get together before the end of the

00:11:20

seminar and see what ideas they can come up with and work out.

00:11:27

The problem is the oldest one, and that is how do you find not only a reliable source of

00:11:39

a material that you want to do therapeutic work with as a client and second how do

00:11:48

you find a therapist who will do this kind of work with you I don’t have an

00:11:57

answer because this entire matter of therapy using psychedelics or MDMA is underground.

00:12:06

And it’s a felony, as I’m sure you all know.

00:12:13

But it still is going on.

00:12:16

The only suggestion I have about how to discover these people

00:12:23

is you have to go very slowly and very carefully,

00:12:28

assuming that most people that you ask direct questions of

00:12:34

are going to wonder if you are an undercover agent.

00:12:40

And they should be asking themselves that.

00:12:42

And they should be asking themselves that.

00:12:50

I think that any therapist who might be open to doing this kind of work will probably want to work with you at least six months in ordinary therapy first.

00:13:02

The only way I can think of to get around the danger to the therapist

00:13:09

is that if you know a therapist who might be open to working with one of these materials

00:13:19

you could ask her, let’s say, if I came for a session

00:13:27

and I happen to have ingested a certain substance I like to work with

00:13:34

just before I came in here,

00:13:37

would it be all right with you if we made this a longer-than-usual session?

00:13:43

Would you be open to the idea?

00:13:47

Now, the tricky thing is that if you mention the particular drug, you’re putting the therapist

00:13:55

on the spot.

00:13:58

If you indicate that it is something that may not be entirely legal,

00:14:07

but that it is a very good insight drug, for instance,

00:14:12

the therapist, I think, and correct me if there are lawyers here who don’t agree,

00:14:21

the therapist, if the actual drug name is not mentioned, might be able

00:14:27

to legally say, yes, I can do that, without being put on the spot and endangering themselves

00:14:36

legally. But that’s about as close as I can imagine getting to a sort of semi-answer about this.

00:14:51

But it was suggested to me earlier that the therapists in this audience really should get together and exchange information.

00:14:58

And having been at this particular conference,

00:15:02

it doesn’t guarantee that you’re a safe person,

00:15:06

but there would be a little less paranoia about it.

00:15:12

So I think that’s as close as I can come.

00:15:15

Does anyone here have any other suggestions about doing this?

00:15:23

is there anyone with any legal training who would like to add

00:15:25

precautions

00:15:27

or cautionary

00:15:28

things about going about this

00:15:31

I think it’s like any

00:15:33

underground it’s like trying to get

00:15:35

to the underground fighting the Nazis

00:15:37

in World War II I mean you don’t just say

00:15:39

by the way is there anyone around here that

00:15:41

belongs to the underground

00:15:43

otherwise

00:15:44

I don’t know if the Internet is much of a help here

00:15:48

because there’s so much.

00:15:50

Anyone can be on the Internet.

00:15:54

Right, right, yeah, it’s not good, okay.

00:15:59

There’s a lot of research in Switzerland,

00:16:01

but that doesn’t help someone in Minnesota.

00:16:03

You know, yeah, the research that’s starting up in Israel and in Europe is really great.

00:16:12

It’s very reassuring.

00:16:15

But there are therapists doing this kind of work underground in this country.

00:16:22

I’m always asked after any lecture,

00:16:25

where can I find one?

00:16:27

And my honest answer is I don’t have the slightest idea.

00:16:30

I have one thing to add.

00:16:32

Yeah.

00:16:32

We know this one therapist who is doing transpersonal work

00:16:38

or getting ready to do it,

00:16:40

and his chemical of choice is ketamine.

00:16:44

And because he’s a medical doctor and he’s done certain work with ketamine,

00:16:49

he can legally give people ketamine.

00:16:52

And he claims that ketamine, you’ll have a very profound experience, you know, et cetera, et cetera.

00:17:00

But that’s one possibility.

00:17:02

Yeah, you happened to push one of my favorite buttons.

00:17:08

Ketamine, I know that those who have used ketamine successfully,

00:17:13

whether in therapy or self-exploration or whatever, swear by it.

00:17:21

My own attitude, frankly, toward ketamine is extremely negative.

00:17:27

I think it’s a very dangerous drug.

00:17:29

I don’t think anything is dangerous once or twice.

00:17:32

I may be wrong about that, too.

00:17:34

But in general, I think you could long-lasting results of chronic ketamine usage,

00:17:50

which are so horrifying.

00:17:54

I could tell you stories about that, but I’ll just say, okay, ketamine for therapy,

00:18:01

I would be extremely careful, and I do a lot of asking questions of the therapist.

00:18:08

Does the therapist know the horror stories, which are true?

00:18:15

How does the therapist feel about, you know,

00:18:20

how many times did he expect to use the ketamine with you?

00:18:24

And I would just be very cautious about it.

00:18:28

I’ve used ketamine both personally and therapeutically,

00:18:33

and used it for a two-year period personally,

00:18:36

and I don’t know, maybe I have ill effects, maybe I don’t,

00:18:38

none that I’ve been able to put my finger on.

00:18:40

But I felt that it provided me significant benefits in my life.

00:18:44

Then I had a difficult patient who had been getting treatment from me and a number of other sources over

00:18:51

a period of years, a young woman, a serious disturbance, but I really could never put

00:18:56

my finger on it. And since I had such a positive experience with ketamine, I consulted with

00:19:02

a friend who was also deeply involved with ketamine and used it therapeutically with her a series of, because it lasts about 30-40 minutes, a series of ketamine experiences that did not have an adverse effect that I know of, I can say, but I’m not sure that we really accomplished anything more than what it occurred prior to the world.

00:19:27

I’d just like to interject that that individual psychiatrist

00:19:30

was more interested in helping people see God and things like that

00:19:35

than just working out their personal problems.

00:19:38

Okay, so in other words, it’s what you might call spiritual work

00:19:42

and not so much personal psychological work.

00:19:45

Okay.

00:19:46

You know, that’s valid.

00:19:48

Okay.

00:19:48

I wanted to say I’ve spoken with several neurologists

00:19:52

and very knowledgeable doctors about ketamine,

00:19:56

and one of the long-term effects of ketamine

00:19:59

is it inhibits something, I believe it’s called glutamine transporase,

00:20:02

and glutamine is a recently discovered neurotransmitter that deals with human observation of time

00:20:07

Oh

00:20:09

That’s why when you take ketamine you feel in a timeless space, it’s very interesting

00:20:14

And at least for me, in my experience, I think that the horror stories mostly come in with people who use it intramuscularly

00:20:21

Or inject it in any way because it’s direct throughout the brain.

00:20:26

I mean, that’s just like with telly and all those things.

00:20:29

Yeah, that…

00:20:30

Yeah, oh, oh, okay.

00:20:33

And I use the Lilly technique

00:20:35

in the sense that you use small amounts

00:20:37

over periods of time, timed intervals,

00:20:40

and you bring yourself to a higher point

00:20:41

than you would if you put, you know,

00:20:43

say, a large amount, went up and then back down.

00:20:46

And you use less, so there’s less long-term damage.

00:20:49

But I don’t think anyone really knows about the damage.

00:20:52

Yeah.

00:20:53

But it is short-term from what I understand.

00:20:55

So long as you don’t use it chronically, there is no long-term damage.

00:21:00

Okay, because the people I’m thinking of were injecting every 15 minutes.

00:21:09

And the worst is that neither of them ever could acknowledge the fact that they were hooked on it at all.

00:21:16

They always expressed it as a preference.

00:21:19

I’d rather be in this state.

00:21:21

They were absolutely unable to recognize, which is not, you know,

00:21:26

that rare, I suppose, with addictions, but they couldn’t see it. John Lilly and another,

00:21:34

because I’ve seen John Lilly, at least he’s functioning. There’s a lady who,

00:21:41

one of our dear friends, and she wrote one of the most successful books

00:21:45

in the 60s.

00:21:47

Very famous, and she’s a terrific lady.

00:21:50

Very brilliant.

00:21:52

She got a million dollar contract

00:21:54

to write a second book.

00:21:57

She got into ketamine.

00:22:00

She had to eventually give back the million dollars

00:22:02

because she wasn’t getting anywhere writing.

00:22:07

She had a supplier who was, I think, either dentist or doctor.

00:22:14

Her friends did an intervention,

00:22:16

threatened the supplier with God knows what.

00:22:20

That worked for a while.

00:22:22

She got back.

00:22:24

She went off it for quite some time.

00:22:27

Got back into it.

00:22:30

The last time I saw this brilliant and creative person

00:22:34

was a couple of months ago, two or three months ago.

00:22:38

And her hair was unwashed.

00:22:43

A friend of mine who’s very, noticed that her nails were dirty.

00:22:51

She couldn’t really properly complete a sentence.

00:22:56

And she’s wrecked.

00:22:59

And my feelings, I have to admit, I am really prejudiced against this drug

00:23:05

because of the kind of damage it does that seems to last long after they maybe have given it up.

00:23:14

They still have strange quirks in their thinking.

00:23:19

They cannot think clearly.

00:23:22

So I would just urge you to be very careful.

00:23:26

Somebody else had a hand up on it. Yeah.

00:23:28

I wanted to make a comment about the therapy question, about seeking someone out.

00:23:32

Yeah.

00:23:34

I don’t mean to dismantle the concept or question the concept of therapy in general,

00:23:40

but I’d like to say my feeling on this is that

00:23:44

isn’t this what our friends are for

00:23:48

like you don’t need to do this out of out of a I shouldn’t say you don’t need to but I’m

00:23:54

assessing the idea of not having a community and a family and a friendship network that’s

00:24:01

strong enough to live with your friends and work through your personal

00:24:06

or spiritual journey? Oh, easy. We have a terrific one in the Bay Area in Northern California.

00:24:16

There is a terrific network, as you know. But I was talking to somebody who lives in Minnesota,

00:24:23

But I was talking to somebody who lives in Minnesota.

00:24:29

And there are a lot of people here who live in different states where I’m sure there are groups, but he hasn’t found the group yet.

00:24:37

And if you’ve just moved to a new place, how do you find…

00:24:41

Do you think that you can find the material to do,

00:24:46

and you have friends?

00:24:48

Maybe they don’t do it,

00:24:50

but to have somebody that will talk with you,

00:24:53

or whatever is the concept of therapy,

00:24:55

or just do it yourself.

00:24:57

Okay, yeah, yeah. Well, yeah, yeah.

00:25:02

But still, there is a great deal of of good successful work done when you have a guide

00:25:08

or you know a therapist or lay therapist guide who’s good and who can you know do shadow work

00:25:15

with you or something like that shadow work is very hard to do by yourself um yeah okay if you

00:25:23

live in a place you’ve lived in a place long enough to have formed a network of friends, I don’t think you’ve got the problem.

00:25:30

But again, it would be good for the therapists in this group to get together and see if they can share information that might be of use.

00:25:42

Yeah?

00:25:41

share information that might be of use.

00:25:43

Yeah.

00:25:46

I think that the idea of therapy with small groups of friends

00:25:47

that is in a more serious context, very

00:25:49

small, like two to three people per

00:25:52

group, I think that that’s the only way

00:25:54

that the underground therapeutic movement can really

00:25:56

move on because, like you’re saying,

00:25:57

there’s no way to just reliably

00:25:59

find a therapist to train.

00:26:01

So, I mean, you need to take the people

00:26:04

who are being the lay therapists

00:26:06

and just let them understand the basic concepts of psychoanalysis, or at least this has been

00:26:11

my experience, and then have them work with other people with, you know, kind of…

00:26:16

Yeah, yeah, yeah, right.

00:26:19

And just work through things, and I think you’ll find that each person has their own,

00:26:23

you know, in the group group has their own therapeutic value.

00:26:26

Yes, that’s true. Yes, far back.

00:26:30

Like you are saying, that’s for the family, that is really important. But I think for

00:26:35

a lot of people that talking about these issues for friends, it can be very demanding on friends.

00:26:41

And because you’re with people you know, like a partner or family, it can sometimes be really hard to open up those feelings.

00:26:47

It might involve those.

00:26:49

Yeah.

00:26:50

And in relation to being an untrained therapist, working, or like a friend working with a patient or a client or whatever you want to call it,

00:26:59

without having the training, because having gone through like four years in university, where you learn loads of things, and having read all these brilliant works,

00:27:08

and written about the interpretation of these visions,

00:27:13

because, as you might always have known,

00:27:16

that these visions are not like a little dwarf coming out and saying,

00:27:19

oh this and this and this is your dark side, and this and this and this is what you’re going to do to sort it out.

00:27:24

Yeah.

00:27:27

It’s just like that.

00:27:30

But we all know that these visions can be really tricky.

00:27:30

Yeah.

00:27:36

And you need to go in and look at them from an impact-sorcery aspect,

00:27:40

like Joffrey, Jordan, you see them talking about, and especially Jung, they’re after-scipes.

00:27:41

Right.

00:28:03

And you might think of yourself like a huge spider. Or to your side, you can’t go and take that to do with anything. Right. Yeah, I agree very much.

00:28:06

I think if…

00:28:11

Yeah, I’d like to add another, my own favorite tool,

00:28:25

which I think is fully equivalent to any drug that you ever come across,

00:28:32

and that’s hypnosis.

00:28:35

You find a good hypnotherapist,

00:28:38

and they can help you unlock exactly the same doors.

00:28:43

And in our network, we don’t think about that very much,

00:28:49

but I worked with a hypnotherapist when I was doing therapy,

00:28:55

and I have immense respect for what can be done.

00:29:00

Again, you’ve got to choose the right person.

00:29:02

You’ve got to be able to feel affinity for them and they for you.

00:29:09

But that goes for any therapy.

00:29:11

But I think you don’t really need MDMA or a psychedelic to do this sort of work.

00:29:20

There are people who say, well, I can’t be hypnotized or I can’t work with it.

00:29:24

I don’t know. Maybe that really is so.

00:29:27

But I think that until these, at least some of these materials become legal,

00:29:37

don’t dismiss the possibilities of hypnotherapy doing exactly what you need and want.

00:29:44

the possibilities of hypnotherapy doing exactly what you need and want.

00:29:49

What about the legal ones like 2327 and all those?

00:29:52

Why aren’t those, can they be used or not?

00:29:59

Yeah, I would think that, of course, there is, as far as I’m concerned,

00:30:03

no substitute for MDMA because it is the insight drug and it does that magical combination of

00:30:06

allowing you to see inside without you know fear and and uh hostility toward toward yourself I mean

00:30:14

it’s beautiful beautiful effect and no other drug that we does anybody has anybody had experience with

00:30:29

any other drug that is close what is menthol J Sasha help help

00:30:41

help. Is it legal?

00:30:42

It’s not illegal.

00:30:43

Not illegal, okay.

00:30:44

What was your experience?

00:30:45

Did you use it for yourself or with patients?

00:30:46

It was just a personal experience.

00:30:47

It was a little shorter, perhaps a little smoother in here and I liked it.

00:30:48

I found it very similar to India.

00:30:49

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:50

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:51

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:52

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:53

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:54

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:55

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:56

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:57

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:58

I think it’s a good experience.

00:30:59

I think it’s a good experience.

00:31:00

I think it’s a good experience.

00:31:01

I think it’s a good experience.

00:31:02

I think it’s a good experience.

00:31:03

I think it’s a good experience.

00:31:04

I think it’s a good experience. I think it’s a good experience. I think it’s a good experience. I think it’s a little smoother and I like it

00:31:07

I found it very similar to India okay

00:31:13

the alpha message is coming that’s about the alpha Ethyl Pyrithione and the

00:31:18

Ethyl group on the alpha position this is in essence is MDMA with an alpha-ethyl-b on the alpha carbon,

00:31:26

but it’s a homolog on the alpha-ethyl-b.

00:31:30

Is it relatively easy to make?

00:31:34

Unfortunately, that’s where this tape cut off,

00:31:37

and I haven’t been able to locate any tapes that might have the continuation of this talk on it,

00:31:42

but if it shows up someday, I’ll certainly be sure to play it for you. However, in reference

00:31:48

to the part we just heard, if you’ll recall that

00:31:52

early in her presentation, Anne mentioned the Palenque conference the year before

00:31:56

when some of us tested some 2CT7.

00:32:00

Well, if you want to know more of the details about that experiment,

00:32:04

you can read more or less an informal report of that experiment on the arrowid.org website, and I’ll put a link to it in the program notes for this podcast.

00:32:14

And I’ll leave it up to you to figure out which of the participant quotes in that report were mine.

00:32:36

Also, as a historical side note, the report of that experiment was written by Casey Hardison, who, as you know, is now one of the more prominent prisoners of the war on drugs, with still over 700 days left to serve in a UK prison cell.

00:32:45

And if you hear this, Casey, we want you to know that you have a world of support out here, and we look forward to you being a free man once again.

00:32:49

Now let’s get on to the second talk in today’s program,

00:32:53

which is one of the talks that was given at the Breaking Convention,

00:32:56

a multidisciplinary conference on psychedelic consciousness that was held at the University of Kent in the UK this past April.

00:33:01

And I happen to know that many of the organizers and participants in that event are also

00:33:06

fellow salonners. So greetings and blessings to you all, and thank you all ever so much for being

00:33:12

part of that important event. Now the talk I’m going to play right now was sent to me by a fellow

00:33:18

podcaster, the man behind the wonderful Shroom with a View podcast, and whose name I’m not sure I’m supposed to say,

00:33:26

or maybe it was another podcaster who wants to remain anonymous,

00:33:30

but just in case, I’ll just thank Shroom with a View for this talk

00:33:33

without giving his other names.

00:33:36

And at the same time, also let you know that

00:33:39

almost all of the rest of the talks from this conference

00:33:42

are available over at www.shroomwithaview.com

00:33:52

and it’s in the archive for podcasts 25 to 49. In fact, you’ll also find a lot of other programs

00:33:59

there that I think you’ll want to check out. And also now he’s being carried on the dopefiend.co.uk network. And

00:34:06

it’s, as you know, the premier podcast network of the tribe. So twice a month, you can catch

00:34:12

another of Shroom’s great programs over there. Now, the talk we’re about to hear was given by

00:34:18

Dr. William Rowlandson, who you will hear is also a fellow salononer and who is co-director of the Center for the Study of Myth.

00:34:27

And the talk he gave that we’re now going to hear

00:34:30

is titled Borges and McKenna,

00:34:32

Iconoclasm, Boundary Dissolution, and Living Symbolically.

00:34:42

Well, thank you for the afternoon, everyone.

00:34:49

It’s a tremendous pleasure and honor to be here.

00:34:53

This is a tremendous gathering of people.

00:34:57

I’ve got some great precedence today.

00:34:59

The speakers have come before me. And some beautiful nuggets of information and ideas that we’ve had over the course of this morning and of yesterday.

00:35:07

One little bit that really sang out to me was Ivan, I don’t know if he’s still here,

00:35:13

talking about the plants having a voice. This to me is a perfect introduction to the area that I’ll be talking about today, which is about understanding reality symbolically, understanding that reality actually communicates with us as much as we

00:35:30

communicate with reality, with us around it. And what I’m going to be talking about, I

00:35:38

don’t know if any of you will be a little bit alarmed at seeing Terence McKenna and

00:35:42

Louise Borges placed together in the same paper.

00:35:47

I think it works very well, and I’ll explain a little bit about this.

00:35:51

I’ve heard over the course of this, over the day and yesterday, various people saying,

00:35:55

you know, I’ve been smoking cannabis since I was 14, or I’ve been taking LSD since I was 15.

00:36:01

Well, in my case, I’ve been drinking Bordicus since I was 15. Well, in my case, I’ve been reading Vortex since I was 15.

00:36:05

And I think that that has been

00:36:06

more of a groundbreaking

00:36:09

and culture-breaking

00:36:12

activity

00:36:14

than probably any amount

00:36:16

of LSD.

00:36:18

Well,

00:36:19

it can be equated to that.

00:36:22

So I’d recommend

00:36:23

Vortex is not for the faint-hearted. I certainly agree with that. So I’d recommend, the board case is not for the faint-hearted,

00:36:25

I certainly agree with that. And I’ve been reading Terence McKenna and listening to Terence

00:36:30

McKenna since a fateful morning walking up to the University of Sanford, and he mentioned

00:36:35

something about the time wave theory, and that was a number of years ago. And although

00:36:41

I held the two in fairly separate compartments of my mind it all came together with one of Lorenzo Haggerty’s podcasts

00:36:50

in which the tremendous author Tom Robbins

00:36:54

I don’t know if anyone’s read Tom Robbins

00:36:56

but those who haven’t I recommend Tom Robbins

00:36:58

Tom Robbins and Hans McKenna were rapping together

00:37:01

and they talked about podcasts

00:37:03

and I was blown out of my chair with this because there were three people who it held very dear to my heart.

00:37:11

Tom Robbins, Terence McKenna, and now they are talking about Borgas.

00:37:14

So the whole thing came together.

00:37:16

But of course it comes together much more than that and this is what I’m going to explain today.

00:37:20

In fact, I’m not going to speak very much. I’m going to read various quotes. I’m going to do a sort of a funny patchwork

00:37:25

affair today of

00:37:28

elements, quotes of

00:37:29

Terence and

00:37:31

Terence, who’s the anniversary

00:37:34

of his death today. So

00:37:35

may he be enjoying his experience with

00:37:37

the machine elves.

00:37:39

He’s probably looking down upon us now.

00:37:42

He’s probably looking down upon us now. He’s probably sitting somewhere.

00:37:57

But in particular, I’m going to be bringing out elements of Terence which I think are fairly often overlooked.

00:38:06

His extraordinary work as a scholar of literature, his reading of Gnosticism, his reading of alchemy,

00:38:09

his understanding of, for example, John Dee,

00:38:12

the Elizabethan alchemist and magician,

00:38:14

and the English Elizabethan alchemist.

00:38:18

His reading of James Joyce, in particular, Finnegan’s Way.

00:38:24

His amazing ability to read and assimilate and bring into the same symbolic dimension his

00:38:28

reading of different authors and different magicianers and different philosophers. And

00:38:34

I realize, of course, it’s very similar to the whole drive of Borkas, who might as well

00:38:40

be a reader. And Borkas, as an explainer of his own reading, his own incredibly extensive

00:38:48

bibliographic reading, I see that they’re actually very similar. They have this incredible

00:38:54

ability to remember huge passages and to bring together this wonderful patchwork, which for

00:39:03

Borkas I would place under this loose term known as mysticism,

00:39:08

and for McKenna I’d put it under this loose term, and I mean loose term, known as psychedelics.

00:39:13

But of course, as I hope to explain, mysticism and psychedelia, or psychedelics, are actually

00:39:19

two different words to explain what’s essentially the very similar conceptual understanding

00:39:27

of the universe. So I’m going to shut up a little bit and let them talk. I think the

00:39:34

first thing to say that I find present in both Terence and in the broadcast is the articulation

00:39:39

of this astonishing paradox, which is probably at the heart of a lot of what we are doing here today and yesterday. And that paradox is the ceaseless, constant drive to understand something that

00:39:54

is inherently un-understandable. Now, of course, that paradox lies in the fact that we understand

00:40:00

that it’s not to be understood, and yet we understand that we continue to try to understand. It’s a beautiful paradox because of course you are presented with the obvious situation of saying well if it’s ineffable, if it’s unexplainable and if it’s

00:40:17

un-understandable then I may as well just give up and go watch daytime telly. But of course we don’t. That’s why we’re here today.

00:40:28

And so when we come to the essential riddle of existence and the riddle of the universe,

00:40:29

there’s this extraordinary paradox

00:40:32

of attempting to understand,

00:40:34

knowing that the ultimate,

00:40:36

the ultimate answer to the riddle of existence

00:40:40

will never be answered.

00:40:42

And I’ve written some quotes here.

00:40:43

Like I said, I’ll let them speak rather than me.

00:40:45

Here’s a quote from Borghuis.

00:40:48

If life’s meaning were explained to us,

00:40:50

he said, in Spanish, but I don’t know, it really isn’t,

00:40:53

we probably wouldn’t understand it.

00:40:56

To think that a man can find it is absurd.

00:40:58

We can live without understanding what the world is or who we are.

00:41:02

The important things are the ethical instinct

00:41:04

and the intellectual instinct, are they not? The intellectual instinct is the

00:41:08

one that makes us search while knowing that we are never going to find the answer.

00:41:14

And Terence, and I won’t try and do his crazy Elfman accent, Terence, here’s a lovely quote

00:41:20

from this podcast, and I don’t know if he called it this or Lorenzo called it this,

00:41:24

but it’s called Muck Nature, which I think is lovely. Living psychedelically, says Terence, Here’s a lovely quote from this podcast. I don’t know if he called it this or Lorenzo called it this,

00:41:26

but it’s called Mucknature.

00:41:27

I think it’s lovely.

00:41:29

Living psychedelically, says Terence,

00:41:33

is trying to live in an atmosphere of continuous unfolding of understanding so that every day you know more

00:41:36

and see into things with greater depth than you did before.

00:41:41

What we get from this also is the understanding that the world is essentially a riddle.

00:41:51

And there’s a lovely little quote here I have from Borges when he was 80 years old.

00:41:54

He’s serious about his interviews when he was 80.

00:41:57

And he says, I think of the world as a riddle.

00:41:59

And the one beautiful thing about it is that it cannot be solved.

00:42:02

But of course, I think the world needs riddles.

00:42:09

I feel amazement all the time and he actually goes into the explanation of the word amazing English word amazing because you think it’s

00:42:12

better than the Spanish for a sombra because it has maze within it so

00:42:17

therefore you’re already entering a maze by the use of the word amazement

00:42:20

whereas a sombra has shadow sombrabra, within it. So you’re

00:42:25

lost in this lack of

00:42:28

understanding in both cases.

00:42:30

Now what this also leads to

00:42:32

is something which would be very

00:42:33

familiar to any readers

00:42:35

or listeners of Terence

00:42:37

and any readers of Bordicus,

00:42:40

which is this sense of

00:42:42

a rejection of dogma,

00:42:54

a sense that belief with a capital B is itself a highly problematic mode of thought,

00:43:06

because belief with a capital B necessarily excludes other lines of thought. So therefore, moving away from rigid doctrine,

00:43:08

moving away from dogma,

00:43:11

is the opening up of a greater sense of tolerance for other lines of thought.

00:43:13

And I found this beautifully articulated

00:43:16

in Borges’ work.

00:43:20

And he uses the word agnostic.

00:43:22

But agnostic here, well, I’ll let him explain. He says,

00:43:25

being an agnostic means all things are possible. Even God. Even the Holy Trinity. This world

00:43:32

is so strange that anything may happen. It may not happen. Being an agnostic makes me

00:43:38

live a larger, a more fantastic kind of world. Almost uncanny. It makes me more tolerant.

00:43:48

fantastic kind of world, almost uncanny. It makes me more tolerant. Now, I guarantee that you cannot have listened to anything of Terence without hearing him repeat that phrase he

00:43:52

uses all the time, which is that the universe is not more weird than we imagine, it’s more

00:43:59

weird than we can imagine. So again, we’ve got this similar perspective of the aesthetic joy and

00:44:08

the epistemological value of bafflement, of puzzlement, of mystification. That itself

00:44:14

is of great, as I say, great epistemological value. So with this idea of belief

00:44:26

Terence then

00:44:28

brings this into this well known

00:44:30

expression, you can see this in little

00:44:32

brief YouTube clips

00:44:34

of culture being

00:44:36

not your friend

00:44:37

because culture being, it’s related

00:44:40

interestingly to the question that Olly just raised earlier

00:44:42

the idea that

00:44:44

culture actually being a defining

00:44:46

boundary

00:44:47

the defining

00:44:50

imposition of boundaries

00:44:51

and of course as we all know Terence

00:44:53

spends a lot of time

00:44:55

expressing the idea that psychedelics

00:44:57

are boundary dissolving

00:44:59

and there’s a lovely little

00:45:02

quote that I have here about

00:45:03

belief, this is from Terence.

00:45:05

Much of the problem of the modern dilemma, he says, is that direct experience has been discounted,

00:45:12

and in its place all kinds of belief systems have been erected.

00:45:17

You see, if you believe something, you are automatically precluded from believing its opposite.

00:45:22

Now, we don’t have to take quite a hard line in that, but he’s also quite an iconoclast

00:45:26

so he probably gets

00:45:27

derived great joy from saying such things.

00:45:31

And another thing that

00:45:32

Terence says, which I think

00:45:34

is again absolutely critical,

00:45:36

culture, he says, that has

00:45:38

habitually broken down the cultural illusion

00:45:40

and examined the terrifying reality beyond

00:45:42

it, have not marched off then

00:45:44

to pontificate with the religions of absolutism

00:45:46

or scientific absolutism

00:45:49

or the rest of it.

00:45:50

Why is that?

00:45:51

It’s because cultures of virtual reality

00:45:53

is made of language.

00:45:55

And if there is one thing psychedelics do,

00:45:57

whether you hate them or love them,

00:46:00

whether you don’t give a hoot,

00:46:02

what they do is they dissolve boundaries.

00:46:04

The boundaries between you and the floor.

00:46:06

Between you and your friend.

00:46:09

Between you and last week.

00:46:11

Between you and next week.

00:46:13

And they dissolve boundaries.

00:46:15

That’s what they do.

00:46:17

That is ultimately subversive behavior.

00:46:19

And again, this is actually a link to Caroline’s talk earlier of the subculture, the subcultural dimension.

00:46:27

Because, of course, until the subculture is being commodified, that subculture is operating with the objective, to a certain degree, of breaking down some of the imposed boundaries of the hegemonic culture.

00:46:43

And, as Ollie asked, until it becomes commodified

00:46:46

as a new cultural norm. That’s what psychedelics do, says Terence. They teach you, we do it

00:46:53

this way, don’t go there. Sorry, sorry, that’s wrong. That’s what cultures do. Cultures are

00:46:57

bound to finding engines. That’s what they do. They teach you, we do it this way, don’t

00:47:02

go there. In your mind, in your heart.

00:47:05

Follow the rules.

00:47:06

Follow the rules.

00:47:08

Cultures are like operating systems.

00:47:11

You know?

00:47:12

At Ur, and well, Ur will do.

00:47:14

They set up a stelae in the center of the marketplace.

00:47:18

And on the stelae, they carve the laws.

00:47:20

These were the laws of the operating system called Ur 1.0.

00:47:24

And that worked fine for a while

00:47:25

now we’re operating under Clinton’s second term 4.0 and is it limiting? I mean

00:47:32

actually you could think of this as a Hillary Clinton event although he was talking in the 1990s

00:47:35

the same things apply. Is it limiting? Is it idiotic? Is it a pain in the rear end? You bet it is.

00:47:42

So that’s a very common feature of people’s reading of Terence,

00:47:47

and also of August, of the idea of breaking down the rigidly maintained barriers

00:47:56

that belief systems, especially cultural belief systems, have set up around us.

00:48:00

And this in itself can be expressed through the term being open and trusted.

00:48:02

around us. And this in itself can be expressed through the term of being

00:48:03

self-adjusted.

00:48:07

Now,

00:48:08

I think we can…

00:48:10

There are more ways

00:48:12

we can look at this, and this is, I think, a very important

00:48:13

one here as well. And this is

00:48:15

coming from an idea

00:48:18

that Terence explains about the ethical

00:48:20

dimension. And I do think this is important.

00:48:23

If psychedelics

00:48:24

don’t secure And I do think this is important. If psychedelics don’t secure

00:48:26

a moral community,

00:48:28

says Terence, then I don’t

00:48:29

see what the point of it is.

00:48:31

Otherwise, we’re just

00:48:33

another cult.

00:48:36

And I think that’s incredibly

00:48:37

powerful words.

00:48:39

Obviously, there is a

00:48:41

need, and again it is linked to this idea

00:48:44

of culture and subculture. There is a need, and again it is linked to this idea of culture and subculture,

00:48:46

there is a need to derive value and meaning as opposed to simply setting up a new cultural

00:48:54

form which will stand in some kind of opposition to a more dominant cultural form. That’s to

00:49:00

say, there needs to be the expression of meaning and of understanding from the experience.

00:49:07

And of course, as Terence was a great painter to explain, one’s meaning derives not from

00:49:14

one’s faith in belief systems, but from the felt presence of immediate experience,

00:49:21

from what you experience. Now here, I’ll start to enter the symbolic world.

00:49:28

Portakus explains on many occasions that the experience of reading, the experience of dreaming,

00:49:37

the experience of nightmare, the experience of imagination is as real as the experience of, for example,

00:49:45

a tangible empirical

00:49:47

activity. And indeed

00:49:49

he says that he knew London far better

00:49:51

from reading Chesterton than when he did

00:49:53

when he went there. Well, as it was, he was

00:49:55

blind when he went there, so it’s hardly surprising.

00:49:57

But in any respect, his experiences,

00:50:00

as he says, of the

00:50:01

dream world are

00:50:03

of as great an importance in his whole cultural

00:50:09

development and his own personal development as his experience of any, let’s say, material

00:50:17

engagement with reality. Indeed, he wouldn’t even make this distinction between a material and an imaginable

00:50:25

the two are

00:50:26

perfectly equated

00:50:28

and this is of great importance

00:50:30

and I think this is of great importance

00:50:32

this refers me back to a conversation

00:50:34

I’ve had with Cameron before

00:50:35

which comes to the idea that if we

00:50:38

look at medical and scientific

00:50:40

explanations of

00:50:42

psychedelic experiences

00:50:44

there might be for example

00:50:46

an expression such as the effects of

00:50:48

X last for

00:50:50

between 5 and 7 hours

00:50:52

or between 3 and 5 hours

00:50:53

or between 7 and 8 minutes

00:50:55

or it may be

00:50:56

now my feeling

00:50:58

that perceiving the world on a more

00:51:01

symbolic basis we start to become

00:51:03

in tune with the fact that the effects actually don’t last just five, 12 hours,

00:51:07

they actually last a lifetime.

00:51:09

Because they actually will help you change your perspective

00:51:13

on how you relate with your surroundings.

00:51:17

But it’s more than that as well.

00:51:18

It’s also about how your surroundings relate with you.

00:51:21

And here this brings up the whole issue of Jung and synchronicity

00:51:26

and how the relationship between psychedelic experiences and synchronicity

00:51:31

are of great importance and we should be attuned to that we should be attuned to

00:51:35

the idea that within the psychedelic experience and beyond the psychedelic

00:51:41

experience and I wouldn’t say out of because that’s’s what I’m arguing, that there isn’t necessarily an outcome, it is an understanding that events transpire

00:51:50

within reality, which are as meaningful to us as the dream world, for example, as the

00:52:02

literature that we’re reading, the books we’re reading.

00:52:07

So there’s a lot more I can say about this.

00:52:08

There’s much more I can say about this.

00:52:15

I’m just trying to think about how to wrap this one up now.

00:52:19

Essentially, the way to bring this together, the way to bring this together is, for me,

00:52:22

the way to bring this together is for me

00:52:23

the

00:52:24

this

00:52:30

conflation of mysticism

00:52:32

and psychedelics

00:52:34

and psychedelic experience

00:52:35

is I find of great importance here

00:52:37

now of course we’ve got

00:52:39

one of the works that I’ve been engaged in

00:52:42

in the last few months is

00:52:43

Borges’ reading of Swedenborg.

00:52:45

Swedenborg, who was a mystic who traveled to the angelic world and talked with angels.

00:52:52

Now, Bordekes places great value upon Swedenborg and upon Swedenborg’s journeys.

00:52:59

And as the same is true of, for example, Rick Strassman’s assessment of the interactions

00:53:06

that people have on the MT with the entities, or the machine, as Terence calls them.

00:53:12

Now, of course, although, as Graham Hancock has done, and probably he’ll talk about this

00:53:16

this afternoon, there is a whole body of literature which is looking at this relationship between

00:53:23

mysticism and psychedelia.

00:53:24

body of literature which is looking at this relationship between mysticism and psychedelia.

00:53:31

The important thing there is the fact of the psychedelic society, as Terence calls it. The psychedelic society is not the society in which everyone is loaded on DMT for hours

00:53:37

a day at all. And indeed, neither is it the society where, as Russ Bingley said earlier,

00:53:43

where, for example, heaven smokes the earth at all. But it’s the society where, as Russ Bingley said earlier, where, for example, heaven smugs

00:53:45

the herd at all. But it’s the society which gives value to the experiences of those who

00:53:51

do. And it’s a society that gives value to the encounters that people have and the learning

00:53:59

that people engage with under these experiences. And of course this again relates to the various conversations

00:54:06

we’ve had about drug policy and the law

00:54:08

because one of the key features

00:54:10

of drug policy is giving no value

00:54:12

to those experiences.

00:54:14

Suggesting that such experiences

00:54:16

are worthless. Now of course

00:54:18

in the same way that we can give

00:54:20

value to the

00:54:22

experiences, let’s say, of William

00:54:24

Blake or Emmanuel Swedenborg as I’ve been reading the board here,

00:54:29

in the same way that the psychedelic society, as Terence calls it,

00:54:32

would be the community that gives value to those experiences.

00:54:36

I’m going to end there because I’m going to just keep rambling.

00:54:38

Thank you.

00:54:50

You’re listening to The Psychedelic Salon,

00:54:53

where people are changing their lives one thought at a time.

00:54:58

I have to admit that when, in the beginning of his talk,

00:55:03

William mentioned an old podcast I did that featured Terrence McKenna and Tom Robbins,

00:55:05

well, I was really quite surprised, because out of all the podcasts I’ve done, that one by far has the very worst

00:55:11

sound quality. And the truth is that I’ve always felt it was a mistake for me to include it in the

00:55:18

salon, particularly since I received several emails saying that they couldn’t make it out at all.

00:55:24

In fact, whenever I think of that podcast, I consider removing it from the listing of podcasts

00:55:29

simply due to the quality of the sound.

00:55:32

But now that I’ve heard how it affected William one morning,

00:55:35

I realize that I should quit second-guessing myself and just let it be.

00:55:40

And by the way, the podcast he was referring to is number 151 and is titled Posthumous Glory,

00:55:47

which refers to a comment that Terrence made during that talk in which he said something to the effect of,

00:55:53

Ah, posthumous glory, that’s where the action is.

00:55:57

And that took everybody by surprise, Terrence included.

00:56:02

It was actually kind of funny when he said it because as the words were

00:56:05

coming out of his mouth, you could kind of see it beginning to dawn on him that he was talking about

00:56:10

himself and, you know, a hush began to descend on the room, which Terrence immediately dispelled by

00:56:16

breaking into one of those big laughs he always had at his own expense. It was really a rare moment

00:56:22

and, quite frankly, is the main reason I included that talk in the podcast.

00:56:26

Now I realize that my reasons for including one talk or another may not have anything to do with the reasons why you or another fellow salonner might like it or not as the case may be.

00:56:38

But getting back to William’s talk just now, I’m so glad that I got to hear it, as he has really helped me gain an even deeper appreciation

00:56:46

of Terrence McKenna’s work. In fact, I’m going to get to work on a new McKenna podcast right now,

00:56:52

and so I’ll do my best to get that out to you tomorrow. So for now, I guess I’d better close

00:56:58

and remind you that this and most of the podcasts from the Psychedelic Salon are freely available

00:57:04

for you to use in your own audio projects

00:57:06

under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike 3.0 license.

00:57:11

And if you have any questions about that,

00:57:12

just click the Creative Commons link at the bottom of the Psychedelic Salon webpage,

00:57:16

which you can get to via psychedelicsalon.us.

00:57:20

And if you are interested in some of the stories

00:57:23

that may or may not have led you and me

00:57:25

to where we are sharing this moment right now

00:57:28

you can read a few of them in my novel

00:57:30

The Genesis Generation

00:57:31

which is available in Kindle format

00:57:34

and other e-book formats

00:57:36

as well as a pay-what-you-can audio book

00:57:38

that’s read by me

00:57:39

and you can find out more about that

00:57:41

at genesisgeneration.us

00:57:43

and for now this is Lorenzo signing off from Cyberdelic Space.

00:57:49

Be well, my friends.