Program Notes

Guest speaker: Terence McKenna

In this continuation of a Terence McKenna workshop from June 1994, he does brief riffs about Joyce’s “Finnegan’s Wake” and Orwell’s “1984”. He then continues with some speculations about what he thought 2012 would bring. Step 1, he speculated, would be that everyone in the world would go outdoors and get naked. And from there he takes off on a wild flight of mind that you have to hear for yourself to truly appreciate his relationship (at that time) to a potential 2012 event. Ultimately he reaches a point where he speculates about why it was (and still is) necessary for a species like us humans to evolve.

Previous Episode

448 - The Cosmic Nervous System

Next Episode

450 - The Primacy of Direct Experience

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

Greetings from cyberdelic space.

00:00:19

This is Lorenzo and I’m your host here in the psychedelic salon.

00:00:23

This is Lorenzo, and I’m your host here in the Psychedelic Salon.

00:00:31

And today we’re going to rejoin Terrence McKenna and listen to a bit more of his June 1994 workshop,

00:00:35

which also includes his take on the state of the world back then,

00:00:38

and, well, to me it sounds almost as if it was given last night.

00:00:44

Actually, I’d kind of forgotten how prophetic and, well, almost religious Terrence could get when he was

00:00:45

deep in the thrall of his visions of 2012. And since I didn’t come into contact with Terrence

00:00:51

and his work myself until, well, about five years after this talk was given, my remembrance of him

00:00:57

doesn’t include such wild speculations as we’re going to hear in this talk. In other words, and

00:01:03

this is only my personal impression, but some of

00:01:06

the scholarship that’s currently underway might confirm or deny this, but it’s my impression that

00:01:11

as the 2012 date became closer, Terrence began to temper some of his more wild speculations like the

00:01:19

ones that we’re about to hear today. But his payoff really comes when he challenges us with the question,

00:01:26

why do I believe this? And when you hear him say that in a few minutes, you may agree with me that

00:01:33

the only reason I can see that any of us really believe those wild 2012 speculations that he was

00:01:39

coming out with back in the 90s, was because we wanted to believe them.

00:01:50

Which, if you think about it, well, it actually comes kind of close to a religious belief.

00:01:56

Now, when he gets to the point where he says that what is accelerating right now is our technology,

00:02:00

well, keep in mind that this is being said in June of 1994.

00:02:07

At that time, only 3% of the U.S. classrooms had an internet connection, and this was also 13 years before the iPhone was announced. Just think about how much that device has caused us to

00:02:13

evolve. To me, well, it seems clear that Terence was really onto something back then, so let’s join I wondered, Joyce says history is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.

00:02:30

He could have said history is a nightmare from which I am hoping to awake,

00:02:34

or history is a nightmare from which I am waiting to awake.

00:02:39

But he said try.

00:02:42

Do you think that was chosen and pivotal?

00:02:45

Is there some kernel of truth to be explored there?

00:02:51

Well, he didn’t.

00:02:54

Joyce put these words into the mouth of Stephan Dedalus,

00:02:57

who said,

00:02:59

history is the nightmare from which I am trying to awaken,

00:03:03

showing that Joyce could write

00:03:04

because he didn’t

00:03:05

put the participle where it would

00:03:07

dangle

00:03:08

but this was

00:03:12

in Ulysses

00:03:13

I think

00:03:16

Joyce came to terms

00:03:17

with all this ten years later

00:03:20

in The Wake

00:03:20

I mean The Wake

00:03:23

I’m now speaking of Finnegan’s Wake,

00:03:27

was his masterpiece

00:03:28

and to my mind,

00:03:30

the urtext of what I’m saying.

00:03:34

Finnegan’s Wake is a book

00:03:36

about everything melting

00:03:38

into everything else.

00:03:40

It’s about all, as he says,

00:03:43

all space in a nutshell.

00:03:47

It’s about union of opposites and dissolution of boundaries.

00:03:55

And in that sense, as all great literature must be, it’s prophecy.

00:04:01

And it’s prophecy about the world we’re now living in, but it’s a deeper prophecy about the world we’re going to live in. Yeah, I think that is the text we should be studying.

00:04:25

for all the unused words in the English language and so forth and so on.

00:04:27

It is many things.

00:04:32

But he had an incredible awareness of the sweep of history and of the stages of history and of the necessary conclusion of history.

00:04:37

He was a Viconian.

00:04:39

He was a fan of Giambattista Vico,

00:04:41

who was the first person to

00:04:45

actually lay

00:04:46

out one

00:04:47

of these

00:04:47

cyclical

00:04:48

historical

00:04:49

schemes of

00:04:50

collapsing

00:04:51

ingress.

00:04:52

Yeah.

00:04:53

Are you

00:04:54

suggesting

00:04:54

that

00:04:55

individuals

00:04:58

that

00:04:58

ingest

00:05:00

the five

00:05:00

grams of

00:05:03

mushrooms

00:05:04

will have

00:05:04

an effect on what happened in 2012?

00:05:07

Or what’s the significance of people that do experience that landscape that’s not seen?

00:05:15

I think it’s a way to liberate yourself from anxiety.

00:05:20

It’s sort of a way to grow up.

00:05:22

If you’re worrying about your car payments

00:05:26

or how you need breast enlargement or any of these things,

00:05:32

then I’m not sure you are fully grounded in the big picture.

00:05:38

And psychedelics give you the big picture.

00:05:41

I mean, they show you exactly where in the cosmic scheme

00:05:45

you fit,

00:05:47

which doesn’t mean

00:05:48

that they diminish you.

00:05:49

It’s not a,

00:05:50

oh goodness,

00:05:51

I’m a mere speck

00:05:52

in the cosmos perception.

00:05:54

It isn’t that.

00:05:55

It shows you precisely

00:05:58

where you fit.

00:06:00

And that relieves anxiety.

00:06:04

And as things proceed toward the concrescence,

00:06:08

it’s going to get crazier.

00:06:10

We have an immense capacity for craziness.

00:06:15

I mean, as an example,

00:06:17

the Soviet Union, the great menace,

00:06:21

this historical nightmare, yada, yada, yada,

00:06:24

it’s gone. It doesn’t exist anymore.

00:06:28

It’s nowhere to be seen. And most people’s attitude is, yeah, so what else is new? So

00:06:36

this immense event happened. It only happened five or six years ago, and we’re already on to yeah, so what, something.

00:06:47

But as time speeds up,

00:06:50

change is going to come

00:06:52

faster and faster.

00:06:53

We will have our perestroika.

00:06:56

And all the smugness

00:06:58

about those silly Marxists

00:07:00

and how they couldn’t

00:07:01

get it together.

00:07:02

This society is fraught

00:07:04

with contradictions

00:07:05

like nothing Marxism ever dreamed of

00:07:08

and when the chickens come home to roost in this scene

00:07:12

you may be sure the shit will hit the fan

00:07:15

am I stringing my metaphors here?

00:07:21

and the hardest thing to do

00:07:24

is to preach catastrophic,

00:07:27

transformative change

00:07:29

in a place like Esalen.

00:07:31

I mean, I’ve been coming to Esalen

00:07:33

since 1975.

00:07:35

Every time you come here,

00:07:37

the staff, the people I know

00:07:39

who live here,

00:07:40

they take me aside and say,

00:07:41

oh, it’s just getting wilder and wilder,

00:07:44

and the factions are rising.

00:07:47

We’re having big changes.

00:07:48

There’s been a lot of big change recently.

00:07:51

Well, hell, they must have microscopes I don’t have

00:07:57

because as far as I can see,

00:07:59

they haven’t tightened a bolt

00:08:01

or turned a screw around here since 1980.

00:08:07

And Esalen, I’m not knocking Esalen

00:08:09

Esalen though is a microcosm

00:08:12

of our society

00:08:13

we say change?

00:08:15

what change?

00:08:17

I have to decide whether I’ll vacation

00:08:19

in Hawaii or Southampton this year

00:08:22

that’s change

00:08:23

go to Bosnia.

00:08:26

Go to Rwanda.

00:08:28

Go to Bangladesh.

00:08:29

Go to Bangkok, Calcutta.

00:08:32

The sense, or even, you know, Moscow.

00:08:35

The sense of chaos is palpable.

00:08:39

It’s palpable.

00:08:40

And I don’t mean you have to go to a crisis scene like Rwanda.

00:08:44

Just fly into Bangkok

00:08:46

on a normal business day and you will suddenly understand something that you can’t understand

00:08:53

by reading newspapers in this country. You’ll understand what population bomb, third world

00:09:00

explosion, high technology, what all these terms mean, because those folks are eating it

00:09:07

right and left. And here in the quiet ivory towers of the managerial societies where the grand

00:09:15

metaphors are handed down to everybody, not much seems to be happening. It’ll come here last,

00:09:21

seems to be happening.

00:09:22

It’ll come here last.

00:09:24

I’m sure.

00:09:25

I’m sure.

00:09:28

I mean, even Europe is in turmoil compared to the United States

00:09:30

by a long shot.

00:09:32

I mean, Europeans are not so weirdly

00:09:35

childish or something,

00:09:39

like that film last night.

00:09:41

You know, they had problems.

00:09:43

They dealt with them.

00:09:46

It didn’t require exegesis

00:09:48

of

00:09:49

second Daniel

00:09:51

as it would here.

00:09:53

They just solved their social problems

00:09:56

by lightening up a little

00:09:57

and society didn’t fall

00:10:00

apart. This is a bastion

00:10:02

of recidivism

00:10:03

and conservatism and let’s do it the old wayism.

00:10:08

And it’s a disgrace, you know, we’re losing money, we’re losing time, and we’re losing a sense of

00:10:13

participation in the global adventure. But it doesn’t matter because the changes that are coming can overwhelm any political scheme.

00:10:26

I mean, eventually the planet itself will weigh in.

00:10:30

And this is not something that can be finessed by politicians

00:10:35

in collusion with the New York Times.

00:10:37

It’s bigger than that.

00:10:40

Instead of suggesting that people should go to Bangladesh or someplace,

00:10:46

you might as well suggest they should go to Watts in Los Angeles.

00:10:49

But the interesting thing happens.

00:10:51

Watts doesn’t exist anymore because we have decided it doesn’t exist.

00:10:55

I got a map from the automobile shop, a fairly recent one,

00:10:58

which shows all the suburbs, and Watts isn’t on it anymore.

00:11:02

Well, how Orwellian right

00:11:05

it’s not there

00:11:07

I had to look on an old map

00:11:09

because I wanted to show somebody

00:11:10

where it was

00:11:11

and I had to dig out old maps

00:11:13

on my car

00:11:14

to find it

00:11:15

but the AA club said

00:11:17

never happened

00:11:20

it never happened

00:11:22

it doesn’t exist

00:11:22

well remember in 1984

00:11:25

in George Orwell’s Dystopia

00:11:28

the hero or the anti-hero

00:11:30

the main character Winston Smith

00:11:32

he worked for the Bureau of Records

00:11:36

in the Bureau of History

00:11:37

and the Bureau of History was this enormous skyscraper

00:11:41

and it had this neon sign that went 24 hours a day

00:11:44

that said,

00:11:45

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And this was the motto of the state.

00:11:56

And under that motto, they rewrote history constantly for the party’s purposes.

00:12:02

for the party’s purposes and this goes on

00:12:05

just exactly as this example

00:12:08

but my basic thing

00:12:11

is not political

00:12:13

I think we can practice smart politics

00:12:15

or silly politics

00:12:17

but the wave that’s coming

00:12:19

will wipe out all politics

00:12:21

because it’s not a political deal

00:12:24

it’s an evolutionary and

00:12:25

transformational deal

00:12:27

where we’re headed you can’t even imagine

00:12:29

I can’t imagine

00:12:31

have you ever tried to

00:12:33

mention the post

00:12:34

oh yeah there’s hard and soft

00:12:37

visions of it

00:12:38

for example

00:12:43

well a very soft vision for example well

00:12:46

a very soft vision

00:12:48

meaning not requiring

00:12:51

Christ and the angelic host

00:12:53

to land on the south lawn

00:12:55

of the White House would be

00:12:56

suppose people just started behaving

00:12:59

appropriately

00:13:00

we talked about this

00:13:02

how if we began to behave appropriately

00:13:05

the world would completely change

00:13:08

I mean suppose we began to behave appropriately

00:13:12

right now

00:13:13

first of all we’d have to think for a minute

00:13:16

but when you decide to behave appropriately

00:13:19

the gnosis usually cuts in

00:13:22

my fantasy is that we would, first of all,

00:13:27

get outside.

00:13:29

We would walk out of the building.

00:13:32

And then we would take off our clothes.

00:13:35

And then, having left the building,

00:13:39

having taken off our clothes,

00:13:41

we would have changed the context of reality so much

00:13:44

that it’s hard to say what the

00:13:46

next appropriate thing would be. Maybe we would all make love in a heap, or maybe we would all

00:13:53

go get large heavy objects and begin smashing all machines. I don’t know what appropriate behavior would be, but that’s one vision of it.

00:14:05

I think it’s something much more dramatic than that.

00:14:09

I think we have to go to religious epiphany to understand what’s happening.

00:14:15

And that all boundaries will be dissolved.

00:14:23

That’s what I think will happen.

00:14:27

And then trying to imagine it, I can’t.

00:14:30

Because everything is defined by boundaries.

00:14:35

I am me, you are you, the past is the past,

00:14:39

the future is the future, here is here, there is there.

00:14:42

If all these distinctions were to be removed, English would

00:14:47

fail and everything would flow together into some kind of a plenum, a holographic manifestation of

00:14:55

the fractal structure that underlies everything. Well, if that, then what that means is that what happens in 2012

00:15:05

is everything

00:15:08

happens

00:15:09

and how can that be

00:15:12

how could everything happen

00:15:13

I mean how could things happen which were

00:15:16

mutually opposed to each other

00:15:18

well apparently one of the

00:15:20

things that happens is

00:15:21

that that kind of either or logic

00:15:24

is exposed for the Aristotelian fraud that it is.

00:15:28

And that, in fact, A can be A and B at the same time.

00:15:34

A Boolean logic of some sort or a hyperdimensional logic replaces ordinary logic.

00:15:42

I think we become immortal.

00:15:42

replaces ordinary logic.

00:15:44

I think we become immortal.

00:15:48

I think that our religions are our guides,

00:15:54

that something unimaginable is casting an enormous shadow

00:15:57

over what we call history.

00:16:00

And that something, from the very beginning,

00:16:04

perhaps before life left the ocean, that thing at the end of time, now only 18 years away, was calling matter toward it, was calling organization toward it. It is trying to turn the universe into a mirror for itself. It is trying to see what it is.

00:16:31

And biology, geology, psychology, human history, these are all mirrors of the divine, if you want to use an old fashioned word and it is

00:16:46

coming into manifestation

00:16:47

it is turning

00:16:49

itself inside out

00:16:51

the universe is becoming

00:16:54

its creator

00:16:55

if you want to think of it

00:16:57

that way and

00:16:59

it’s bigger

00:17:01

than the biggest

00:17:03

of us.

00:17:08

And we human beings, you know,

00:17:10

we are taught by Christianity that we were created in God’s image.

00:17:14

Funny notion.

00:17:15

You look at yourself standing naked

00:17:18

in your bathroom on your scales

00:17:20

and you wonder, God’s image?

00:17:23

God must be a weird-looking sort of entity, if that’s true.

00:17:29

But in a way, I think it is true.

00:17:31

And our society is an image of this thing.

00:17:35

And so the mind, the connectedness, the network,

00:17:41

the wiring everything together,

00:17:43

what we want to do is we’re trying to create something which is

00:17:46

simultaneously the

00:17:48

resurrection body,

00:17:50

a flying saucer,

00:17:52

the philosopher’s stone,

00:17:55

the human soul,

00:17:56

and the lotto jackpot.

00:17:58

All at once.

00:18:01

In one package.

00:18:03

And as

00:18:04

things previously separated flow together,

00:18:08

the thing is gaining power.

00:18:11

And it’s been building itself since the universe burst into existence,

00:18:16

however many billion years ago.

00:18:18

But now the pace has incredibly quickened.

00:18:22

This is, strangely enough, the promise

00:18:26

of all

00:18:27

Western religions.

00:18:30

Judaism, Christianity,

00:18:33

Islam

00:18:33

are united in one

00:18:36

incredibly unlikely

00:18:37

perception.

00:18:40

The idea that God will

00:18:41

enter history.

00:18:43

That’s what those religions teach.

00:18:46

To a Buddhist, this is the ravings of a diseased intellect.

00:18:50

It makes no sense at all, that statement.

00:18:55

God will enter history.

00:18:58

And yet, this is what these religions have maintained over millennia.

00:19:03

Refining it.

00:19:06

First, you know, the primary revelation to Abraham and then the whole recension of the New

00:19:13

Testament and then Mohammed’s final setting of the dials before secular

00:19:20

scientism made this game obsolete. God will enter history.

00:19:26

That’s the promise of our religions.

00:19:28

And I think it’s an intuition.

00:19:31

It’s not something that even the people who preach it understand.

00:19:36

It’s an intuition that you cannot escape.

00:19:39

It’s an intuition that you cannot escape

00:19:42

inside the psychedelic experience.

00:19:44

And you say, why do I

00:19:46

believe this? It makes no sense at all. Why do I believe this? It makes no sense at all. You know,

00:19:53

Tertullian was told of his belief in Christianity. He had been a great Gnostic thinker. He was said,

00:20:03

they came to him and they said,

00:20:05

why do you believe this stuff about the resurrected Jew?

00:20:09

It’s absurd.

00:20:11

It’s ridiculous.

00:20:12

And he said, credo te absurdum.

00:20:17

I believe because it is absurd.

00:20:21

This is first century AD.

00:20:24

What a brilliant and prophetic man. I believe it

00:20:28

because it is absurd and therefore it compels belief. And I think that’s what this thing

00:20:36

coming is all about. It has to be believed in because it is absurd. But what is equally unlikely is its absence. I can’t live with

00:20:49

the idea of 10,000 years more of human history. It would be a nightmare. You can see what we’re

00:20:58

headed toward. Rationed resources, propaganda, rigid programming, complete control of the population. There’s no other way to manage ourselves. But God will spare us that horror by decreeing an end to the historical caesura

00:21:25

and the religions

00:21:27

I am not religious

00:21:29

in the sense that I dismiss

00:21:31

these organizations

00:21:33

as scheming weasels

00:21:35

who want to get into your pocket and your pants

00:21:38

but this

00:21:39

intuition

00:21:40

is true

00:21:43

and

00:21:44

we need to make sense of it.

00:21:49

Scientifically.

00:21:50

I think it can be made sense of scientifically.

00:21:54

I think we have kept our eyes averted

00:21:56

from the problem of time.

00:21:59

Because science can’t be science

00:22:02

if time is a shifting set of variables.

00:22:09

Remember how we talked about science depends on experiment to do its business?

00:22:14

So science has kept its eyes very modestly averted from the problems with our model of time.

00:22:22

But it’s very real.

00:22:22

with our model of time.

00:22:24

But it’s very real.

00:22:26

And tonight, if we get a computer,

00:22:28

I’ll show you a model of time that I think is more like the world you’re living in,

00:22:33

more like your own experience,

00:22:35

except that it leads to this impossible-to-come-to-terms-with conclusion

00:22:41

that we are on the cusp of the greatest transformation

00:22:45

since life appeared on the planet, at least.

00:22:50

Yeah.

00:22:51

One of the questions I have is that

00:22:54

the evidence that you’ve been citing so far is local.

00:22:57

It’s Earth-bound evidence.

00:23:00

And is this event a local event

00:23:03

or does it have more cosmic implications?

00:23:06

Well, that’s a great question

00:23:09

and one I’ve spent a lot of time on.

00:23:12

As I said to you a couple of days ago, I think,

00:23:15

I’m not sure we’re talking here about

00:23:17

the god who hung the stars like lamps in heaven,

00:23:21

as Milton said.

00:23:22

More, I think, we’re talking about

00:23:24

the bursting of a

00:23:26

guyan egg

00:23:27

but because

00:23:30

my theory predicts

00:23:32

the future

00:23:33

I

00:23:35

am constrained

00:23:38

to tell you that

00:23:39

since 1972

00:23:42

74

00:23:43

when I finished my theory,

00:23:46

it has indicated that the most novel day of the year 1994

00:23:55

would be the 23rd through the 26th of July.

00:24:10

Well, now it happens that this being that year,

00:24:14

I’ve been waiting for something novel to happen on the 23rd through the 26th of July,

00:24:17

so I won’t have a failure on my hands.

00:24:20

And the solar system has obligingly provided

00:24:24

a planetesimal impact on the surface of Jupiter.

00:24:29

Astronomy magazine called it a one in a hundred million year event.

00:24:36

Great.

00:24:38

How fortunate that I’m around to see it.

00:24:41

You see, you can tell there’s something wrong with their model

00:24:44

if it’s a one in a hundred

00:24:46

million year event and you just happen to be standing there when it happens, that’s a coincidence

00:24:52

too great to ignore. And the philosopher of science, P. W. Bridgman, in a famous statement

00:25:00

once said, a coincidence is what you have left over when you apply

00:25:05

a bad theory

00:25:07

that’s what you get is a coincidence

00:25:10

so

00:25:12

I at least

00:25:14

in answer to your question now

00:25:16

think that this is about

00:25:17

the solar system

00:25:19

what occurs to me

00:25:21

as a nice denouement

00:25:24

that would just settle the thing very precisely would be if at 11.18 a.m. December 21st, 2012, minus nine minutes, the sun were to explode.

00:25:43

that would nicely do it then rainforest preservation

00:25:46

yen to dollar ratio

00:25:49

HIV

00:25:50

it all would suddenly fall into a new perspective

00:25:55

if the sun were to explode

00:25:58

because this planet would vaporize nine minutes later

00:26:02

and all life would die instantly

00:26:04

interesting concept, die instantly.

00:26:07

You know, the Argentine surrealist writer Jorge Luis Borges has a story. I can’t remember what

00:26:15

it’s called, but the idea of this story is that a species cannot enter hyperspace until the last member of the species dies.

00:26:31

And until that moment, the entire species is corralled in some kind of limbo, waiting.

00:26:38

So the explosion of the sun would liberate the last member of many species it would be a great dying and

00:26:50

That sounds like a Holocaust

00:26:53

Except except remember that we don’t know what dying is

00:26:59

we haven’t a clue and

00:27:02

So it’s possible that the pessimists and the optimists are going to discover

00:27:08

that they were both right. And the people who are running around saying, we’re all going to die,

00:27:15

we’ve ruined the earth, we’ve wrecked it, now we’re going to go extinct, are in fact correct. However, this is the purpose of biology. Biology populated

00:27:30

the planet to come to this moment. Now, I don’t seriously suggest this because I don’t seriously

00:27:37

suggest anything, but it is an interesting model. And there’s something wrong with the sun.

00:27:46

I don’t know if you know this.

00:27:48

It’s not much talked about.

00:27:51

But the nuclear chemistry

00:27:56

has been worked out in very great detail

00:28:00

since the 1930s.

00:28:02

It’s not complex if it’s your profession.

00:28:06

Nuclear chemistry is very, very straightforward in 1994.

00:28:12

However, theory does not agree with measurement

00:28:17

when you look at the sun.

00:28:20

If the sun is the kind of nuclear reaction

00:28:24

that we believe it to be

00:28:26

then for reasons not at all clear

00:28:29

it’s emitting 30% less neutrinos

00:28:33

than it should

00:28:34

there is no way to account for this

00:28:39

except to suppose

00:28:42

that one, either nuclear theory has something wrong with it,

00:28:48

and if it does, this is the only problem we’ve discovered

00:28:51

where theory doesn’t match up with measurement.

00:28:55

Either there’s something wrong with theory,

00:28:58

or there’s something wrong with the sun.

00:29:01

Well, what could it be?

00:29:04

Well, the sun is a nuclear

00:29:06

furnace

00:29:07

if it were to go

00:29:10

off the boil

00:29:11

its neutrino output

00:29:13

would drop by the observed

00:29:16

amount

00:29:16

what that means then is that sometime

00:29:20

in the last

00:29:21

100,000 years

00:29:23

nuclear fusion

00:29:25

ceased at the core

00:29:28

of the sun

00:29:28

and the sun is

00:29:31

like a pot of water

00:29:34

that boiled but then you turned

00:29:36

the heat off but it boiled

00:29:37

for a moment longer

00:29:39

that moment is the last

00:29:41

hundred thousand years

00:29:42

and at the center of the Sun the process of

00:29:47

cooling is slowly making its way to the surface and when it arrives at the

00:29:52

surface the Sun will not explode it will undergo a 70% reduction in energy output

00:29:59

almost within a day or two that would effectively freeze out this planet.

00:30:09

There are other forms of instability in the universe

00:30:14

that could make themselves felt.

00:30:17

We know that many times in the history of this planet,

00:30:23

enormous planetesimal objects have impacted.

00:30:29

I showed you the picture of the moon being born

00:30:33

on the cover of Scientific American

00:30:35

when a Mars-sized object smashed in to the archaic Earth.

00:30:41

Over the billions of years that have followed, this has happened over and over again,

00:30:47

not Mars-sized objects, but dig the fact that an object 30 meters in diameter slammed down

00:30:56

50,000 years ago out near Flagstaff, Arizona, and created a crater a half a mile across,

00:31:03

Arizona and created a crater a half a mile across and everything within 800

00:31:05

miles died instantly 65 million years

00:31:11

ago an object smashed down on the

00:31:16

Yucatan what is now the Yucatan

00:31:18

Peninsula breaking up as it entered the

00:31:21

atmosphere a second fragment impacting near the Solomon Islands.

00:31:28

Nothing on earth larger than a chicken lived through that experience.

00:31:32

I mean, you want to talk about an apocalypse,

00:31:38

that object was on the order of, oh, I don’t know,

00:31:44

half a kilometer to a kilometer.

00:31:47

It depends on the speed at which it was moving, so it’s hard to estimate its size.

00:31:52

But it was on that order.

00:31:54

It was five miles into the planet in the first ten seconds of the impact event.

00:32:02

It was five miles deep into the planet in the first ten seconds of the impact event. It was five miles deep into the planet in the first 10 seconds of

00:32:07

the impact. It raised a wall of rock 125,000 feet high that moved out at 15 times the speed of sound

00:32:18

from the impact zone. I mean, we’re talking about a blow that if you had been on the opposite side of the planet,

00:32:25

it would have thrown you across the room.

00:32:28

That happened.

00:32:30

There was an earlier one at the Cretaceous-Jurassic boundary 220 million years ago.

00:32:37

These things are out there.

00:32:40

We are studying them.

00:32:41

There’s a whole program at NASA to study what are called the Apollo Earth Crossers.

00:32:47

These are objects greater than 30 meters in diameter

00:32:51

that actually cross the orbit of the Earth.

00:32:54

That means at some point in the future

00:32:57

they have a potential for impact.

00:33:00

Well, if we fail to detect one of these things

00:33:03

and divert it,

00:33:06

our social systems would come apart completely

00:33:11

under an impact of even moderate size.

00:33:14

So the Earth is a dynamic and dangerous place.

00:33:19

And I think that biology doesn’t ever stand still.

00:33:24

That we are, essentially,

00:33:28

we were born in a taxi,

00:33:30

and we’re going to have to get out of the taxi

00:33:33

at some point.

00:33:34

It’s not home.

00:33:36

And it’s possible that we sense this.

00:33:41

We sense an impact or a catastrophe.

00:33:44

One of the peculiar things about the catastrophe

00:33:47

which killed the dinosaurs is there’s now virtually universal agreement that this happened,

00:33:55

meaning the other theories have more or less had to knuckle under because they just didn’t

00:34:01

have the evidence. But the strongest piece of evidence the anti-impact

00:34:05

theories had was a curious drop in the overall number of species immediately before the impact.

00:34:17

And by that I mean in the million years preceding the impact, a great dying was underway of some sort.

00:34:27

That biology is not three-dimensional like we are

00:34:31

and that the reason a great dying was underway

00:34:34

was because biology somehow in some minded sense

00:34:41

was able to anticipate this incredible

00:34:47

Catastrophic event that was headed toward it and so the die-off began

00:34:52

before the event underwent the

00:34:55

formality of actually

00:34:57

occurring and it could be then that

00:35:02

the planet as it recovered from this

00:35:05

shattering event in a sense

00:35:09

made a resolution

00:35:11

never ever again

00:35:15

can this be allowed to happen

00:35:18

to biology on this planet

00:35:20

never again must we be victim

00:35:23

of this kind of an impact well

00:35:26

there’s only one way to avoid an impact like that they’re inevitable out there

00:35:32

in the future there’s only one way that a planet can avoid that kind of trauma

00:35:38

you have to take an animal you have to cut it from the herd

00:35:46

and you have to say,

00:35:48

you are going to be the species

00:35:51

that protects us

00:35:54

from this kind of an event.

00:35:58

And how can an animal

00:36:00

save a planet from impact

00:36:03

with a planetesimal?

00:36:06

There’s only one way.

00:36:08

Through technology.

00:36:13

Through an ability to build hydrogen bombs and deliver them to their target accurately and quickly.

00:36:20

And so we’re it.

00:36:23

We were chosen.

00:36:45

And so we’re it. We were chosen. We have become deputized to make the journey into the secrets of matter, to gain the power necessary to actually be able to protect the planet, to do more than wring our hands. A century ago, we could only have wrung our hands.

00:36:47

Fifty years ago,

00:36:49

we could only have wrung our hands.

00:36:53

Now, if we had sufficient warning and the physical parameters

00:36:56

of the problem

00:36:56

were within certain limits,

00:36:58

meaning the object not too large,

00:37:01

not moving too fast,

00:37:03

we could probably blow it

00:37:04

to smithereens. And I think that this is

00:37:10

probably the res in detra of Western civilization and science, that this power which we use to

00:37:18

incinerate those who dissent from our political point of view is not for that. It’s for keeping the planet intact

00:37:27

from the inevitable dynamic catastrophes that the physical universe deals out.

00:37:37

Well, so that’s one scenario to answer your question of what would the end be like.

00:37:44

It may not be like that at all.

00:37:46

It may be something completely different.

00:37:49

I’ve noticed that in terms of this acceleration phenomenon,

00:37:54

what is accelerating is technology.

00:37:59

Technology and our own evolution

00:38:01

seem so intimately connected

00:38:03

that they are almost the same thing.

00:38:06

Well, we are now talking about star flight,

00:38:10

time travel,

00:38:12

downloading ourselves into circuitry,

00:38:16

genetic replication of information

00:38:20

so that we can store ourselves

00:38:22

in flounder and tomatoes and octopi. We are

00:38:27

currently debating a number of transformative technologies that are not like building

00:38:34

railroads, digging ditches, or stitching better sails. We are contemplating technologies that

00:38:41

will change the face of ourselves and nature forever

00:38:45

and I think you know

00:38:47

the rate of technology has never

00:38:50

been faster

00:38:51

the rate of new inventions, new discoveries

00:38:54

new principles all pouring

00:38:56

together and I think we said

00:38:58

at some point in this workshop

00:38:59

what is keeping the transcendental

00:39:02

event from happening is

00:39:04

simply the momentum of our habit of not letting it happen.

00:39:08

But if we would lift the barriers, if all information could be freely exchanged among laboratories, scientists, social planners, so forth and so on, we don’t know at this point what we’re capable of. The hardware that we have created

00:39:25

far exceeds the capacity

00:39:28

of any software that we have written.

00:39:32

We have hardware that we don’t know

00:39:34

what you can do with

00:39:36

because we haven’t written the software

00:39:39

to take advantage of its speed,

00:39:41

its depth, its iterative potential. And I think the tools are already

00:39:48

being placed before us that will allow us to either understand and flow with the transformation

00:39:57

that is upon us, or to create it if it is reluctant to appear on schedule.

00:40:05

Plato said if God didn’t exist, man would invent him.

00:40:09

Well, the Western idea of God entails the idea of his entry into history and the salvational scenario.

00:40:19

And so I think it’s safe to say that if that salvational scenario doesn’t exist

00:40:25

then human beings

00:40:27

will create it

00:40:29

out of the imagination

00:40:31

out of the psychedelic

00:40:34

imagination

00:40:35

that’s it

00:40:38

I thought you meant that

00:40:39

2012

00:40:41

mankind would die

00:40:43

not from

00:40:44

a catastrophic event,

00:40:47

but something that we’re doing

00:40:48

would be a progressive thing

00:40:50

like disease is epidemic,

00:40:52

et cetera, et cetera,

00:40:53

and we were killing ourselves

00:40:55

and it would show within 18 years.

00:40:57

No, I’m looking at something

00:40:58

much more dramatic and sudden.

00:41:01

No, I mean, we’re going to have problems,

00:41:03

we’re going to have a lot of problems

00:41:04

for the next 18 years

00:41:06

and an enormous

00:41:07

number of triumphs

00:41:08

and breakthroughs

00:41:09

it’s going to be

00:41:11

like it has been

00:41:13

only more so

00:41:14

up until around

00:41:16

I would say

00:41:17

by 28

00:41:19

2008

00:41:20

2009

00:41:22

around there

00:41:24

I think that I will have either given this wrap up

00:41:28

or this will be the dominant paradigm.

00:41:33

Because either if I’m right, the signs will build.

00:41:38

It’s not going to take us by surprise.

00:41:40

It’s not going to jump us.

00:41:41

The signs are building.

00:41:43

I maintain with my particular

00:41:46

tweak division

00:41:47

that I can see it already

00:41:49

the light at the end of the tunnel

00:41:51

but maybe I’m

00:41:53

bananas or something

00:41:55

so let’s give it five years

00:41:57

let’s give it ten years

00:41:59

but I think it’s going to turn out to sound

00:42:01

more and more and more

00:42:03

like the only game in town because our political

00:42:07

systems are failing. Our ability to control our technology is absolutely beyond us at

00:42:15

this moment. And I think factors are just going to keep accumulating. My career is a phenomenon of this I mean 25 years ago

00:42:26

this rave got you hospitalized

00:42:28

now it’s a profession

00:42:30

you know

00:42:32

and it may be orthodoxy

00:42:35

in 15 years

00:42:37

and 20 years from now

00:42:38

it don’t matter anyhow

00:42:40

does it

00:42:41

it will either have arrived

00:42:43

or I will have slipped

00:42:45

decently away into retirement

00:42:48

and the whole thing

00:42:49

will be something else

00:42:51

time is slowing down

00:42:54

in contrast to our

00:42:55

acceleration against it

00:42:57

you mean like natural time

00:42:59

well it depends

00:43:02

I mean either we’re speeding up

00:43:04

or it’s slowing down

00:43:05

but the sum total of the system

00:43:08

is an impression of enormous acceleration

00:43:11

and that’s I think what we have here

00:43:14

an impression of an enormous acceleration

00:43:17

into the unexpected

00:43:20

the unpredicted

00:43:21

and the mysterious

00:43:26

and then if you love all those things

00:43:29

the unpredictable, the mysterious

00:43:30

the unexpected

00:43:32

you love what is happening

00:43:34

and if you hate those things

00:43:36

you absolutely hate what is happening

00:43:38

you say the world is getting worse and worse

00:43:40

it’s getting terrible

00:43:41

agony, hunger, hysteria

00:43:44

these things are

00:43:46

spreading. That’s right. But not

00:43:47

faster than integration,

00:43:50

information,

00:43:51

managerial skills, strategies for

00:43:54

salvation and new

00:43:55

technologies and social inventions.

00:43:58

It’s all of a piece.

00:44:00

But my faith is

00:44:01

novelty will win.

00:44:03

It is winning or we wouldn’t be here talking like this.

00:44:08

Novelty is winning and it will win

00:44:10

and therefore, you know, sit back and enjoy the show.

00:44:21

You’re listening to The Psychedelic Salon

00:44:23

where people are changing their lives one thought at a time. of time as a computer geek, I was always taught that the proper term for such a transfer was

00:44:45

uploading, moving our consciousness up into a computer. But now I see how maybe Terence got it

00:44:52

right. Think about this for a minute. If our consciousness was now actually in a computer,

00:44:57

and then if we moved it into a human body, would we be saying that we are downloading or uploading our consciousness?

00:45:10

To me, it seems like going from a computer box to a human body is a step up.

00:45:16

And unless you’re somewhat of a geek like me, this comment is going to be completely meaningless to you.

00:45:18

I’m sorry about that.

00:45:25

Now, I hate to belabor this point because Terence spent a good deal of time on it already, but unless I’m sadly mistaken, it has now been determined that there is a probability,

00:45:30

and not necessarily a low one, that a large asteroid or comet is eventually going to threaten this planet.

00:45:37

We know that the odds are that one day such a thing is going to be a reality.

00:45:42

However, finally, at last, NASA has begun to do something about that problem,

00:45:48

but on an extremely small scale.

00:45:51

Yet, this country spends more money on military hardware

00:45:54

that is designed purposely to kill other humans.

00:45:58

More money is spent on that than all the other nations combined.

00:46:01

Now, I can go on, but the insanity of it all just boggles my mind. There is an actual

00:46:07

threat to all life on this planet, yet the people who own this world ignore it so as to use their

00:46:13

resources to kill others who aren’t like them. Objectively speaking, and from a high perspective,

00:46:20

this what we call the human experiment, well, it seems to me to be a complete

00:46:25

failure. I guess I’m in a bad mood today, huh? So getting on to something a little lighter,

00:46:33

I had to smile during that bit when Terrence was saying how, at the time of this talk at least,

00:46:39

the people at Esalen were saying that big changes were taking place there at Esalen since his last appearance.

00:46:47

Well, I’ve only been to Esalen once, and that was in June of 2012 when Bruce Dahmer and I led a

00:46:53

weekend workshop there. And amazingly or coincidentally, I don’t know what, but at that

00:46:59

time their little community was also all abuzz about the big changes going on.

00:47:09

I think that there were even competing websites devoted to the various factions,

00:47:13

and both sides were predicting the end of it all.

00:47:14

Esalen would go away.

00:47:18

However, I noticed that Esalen is still going strong.

00:47:20

And please don’t let me leave you with the impression that there was anything negative about my experience there.

00:47:24

I simply find it interesting to see how even the most spiritually enlightened among us are still

00:47:29

humans in our hearts and souls, and as such we often squabble. But in Esalen’s case, well, it

00:47:36

seems to me that all of these years of squabbling have actually made the institution all that much

00:47:40

stronger. And by the way, when Terence mentioned what he thought was the big

00:47:45

event that was going to come the following month in July of 94, which would be the comet impact on

00:47:51

Jupiter, well, I decided to check Wikipedia to see if his dates were correct. And at least according

00:47:57

to Wikipedia, they were. But what also happened at that time, which remember would have been after

00:48:03

this talk was given, well what also

00:48:05

happened then was that the peace accord was signed between Israel and Jordan, and this is the accord

00:48:11

that ended a war that had been going on since 1948. Now I’m not trying to support his time

00:48:17

wave theory here, but the evidence there is kind of interesting, don’t you think?

00:48:23

Now it’s been a while since I’ve mentioned this,

00:48:26

but for a few years now, I’ve had a flipboard magazine titled Psychedelic Salon. And there’s

00:48:31

a link to it on our program notes blog, which you know you can get to via psychedelicsalon.us.

00:48:37

And now you can read my flipboard magazine on the web, as well as on the flipboard app on your

00:48:43

phone. That magazine is where I post some of the interesting little news items that I come across. Thank you. Inside Bud and Breakfast, the air nub of marijuana tourism. The nine states where marijuana will be legalized last.

00:49:08

An article about how ayahuasca may be used for treating depression.

00:49:13

How cannabis is going to change life as we know it.

00:49:16

And an interesting article about a DEA warning, this is true, about stoner rabbits in Utah.

00:49:24

Which is something you may want to be on the lookout for

00:49:27

if you’re a rabbit hunter up there.

00:49:31

Actually, I’d like to continue on with my thoughts

00:49:33

about watching, hunting, and eating stoned rabbits,

00:49:37

but I’ll spare you that for now.

00:49:39

Instead, I think I just ought to sign off,

00:49:41

have a few tokes, and speculate to myself

00:49:44

about all the funny things a stoned rabbit could do.

00:49:48

And so, for now, this is Lorenzo signing off from Cyberdelic Space.

00:49:53

Be careful out there, my friends. Thank you.