Program Notes

https://www.patreon.com/lorenzohagerty

Guest speaker: Terence McKenna

[NOTE: All quotations are by Terence McKenna.]

“What psychedelics are about is deconditioning all of these culturally induced, sensory biases and idealogical biases, basically it reshuffles the intellectual and sensory deck. And it’s a wonderful, salutary thing to come along for Western culture at this moment because we’re basically running out of intellectual steam. Technology is moving ahead lickety split without looking over its shoulder, but our social systems, our religious ontologies, our theories of polity, city planning, community, resource sharing, all of this is 19th Century at best. And so, really whether we live or perish as a species probably has to do with how much consciousness we can raise from any source available.”

“If consciousness is not part of our future then what kind of future can it be?”

“Culture is an intelligence test.”

“I like to think that the psychedelic community has always been a source of visionary common sense because the psychedelic community, generally speaking, has not generated ideology.”

“I think primates are most interesting when cornered.”

The Psychedelic Salon 2.0

Previous Episode

514 - Anarchy Is The Ideal

Next Episode

516 - Our Cyberspiritual Future Part 2

Similar Episodes

Transcript

00:00:00

Greetings from cyberdelic space, this is Lorenzo and I’m your host here in the psychedelic

00:00:23

salon.

00:00:24

And I first want to thank the many people who have commented on my announcement last week

00:00:29

that I would be ending my personal presentation of new podcasts next March.

00:00:34

It would be an understatement for me to say how very much your wonderful comments and suggestions have meant to me.

00:00:40

And after we listen to today’s talk by Terrence McKenna,

00:00:44

and after we listen to today’s talk by Terrence McKenna I’ll be back to give you some of the initial details

00:00:47

of what I’m thinking of as Psychedelic Salon 2.0

00:00:51

which will begin next March if not before

00:00:54

from the comments that I’ve received so far

00:00:57

after I’ve posted some of my ideas on the forums

00:01:00

I think that there’s going to be a lot of excitement

00:01:03

about this next phase of podcasts from the salon.

00:01:07

To be honest, one of the things that I was afraid of after I announced that I was coming to the end of the time

00:01:13

that I personally would be editing and presenting these various talks and interviews

00:01:18

was that perhaps interest would drop off to the point where there would be no longer enough donations

00:01:24

to keep the salon online and producing new programs,

00:01:28

which is what I’ll be talking about after we first listen to today’s Terrence McKenna lecture.

00:01:33

But my fears appear to be completely unfounded because the following salonners didn’t let any announcement deter them,

00:01:40

and they nonetheless went ahead and made donations to help with the ongoing, for years to come I hope, work of these podcasts.

00:01:48

And these wonderful and to me inspiring people are

00:01:51

Alec F., Quigsta LLC, Jordan E., Daryl C., and John P.

00:02:00

Your continuing support for this project has truly warmed the cockles of my heart, and I will certainly not forget you.

00:02:08

But before I get to the details about the Psychedelic Salon 2.0, we first are going to get to listen to some new material from Terrence McKenna.

00:02:18

Today, and for the next few weeks, I’ll be playing some recordings that were made in early August of 1997 at Esalen,

00:02:26

where Terrence led a workshop that was titled, Our Cyber-Spiritual Future.

00:02:31

As far as I know, none of this material has yet to find its way online, at least under that title.

00:02:38

The tapes that came to me with the talks from this workshop were not professionally produced,

00:02:44

and so every once in a while you’ll hear a little glitch of some kind.

00:02:48

And that isn’t me editing anything out, it’s just the way the recording came to me.

00:02:53

One of the things that you may want to keep in mind as you listen to this talk today is

00:02:58

that it was given almost nine years after the last series of McKenna Talks that we listened

00:03:03

to, and a lot had happened in the meantime,

00:03:06

including the reunification of Germany,

00:03:10

the beginning of the Human Genome Project,

00:03:13

the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope,

00:03:16

Nelson Mandela was freed,

00:03:17

and Tim Berners-Lee created the first web server

00:03:21

to begin the foundation for the World Wide Web.

00:03:24

And all that happened only the first web server to begin the foundation for the World Wide Web. And all that happened only the first year after the last McKenna talk that I posted.

00:03:30

So a lot of things had changed during the interval between these two workshops.

00:03:34

But as you’ll hear in a moment, much was still the same as it remains yet today.

00:03:41

Now in about 20 minutes, you’re going to hear Terrence talking about the ideas of Marshall McLuhan and say that he didn’t think that democracy could survive except within the world of print.

00:03:52

And in the past, we’ve heard Terrence speak about the fact that we’ve been living inside a print culture.

00:04:05

about this now so that when you get to that part, you may want to pause your MP3 player for a moment and give some thought to the possibility of truth in what Terrence says about only within a print

00:04:12

culture can the idea of democracy and the nation state be sustained. And then consider the fact

00:04:19

that we now seem to be well beyond the point of no return when it comes to leaving the culture of print

00:04:25

for a more directly interconnected digital culture.

00:04:29

I’m not sure that any of this is of any real importance right now,

00:04:33

but I suspect that you might be able to see some patterns evolving around you

00:04:37

that, well, have the potential to make seismic changes in our lives.

00:04:42

Or at least these things are fun to talk about late at night,

00:04:45

especially with a few doobies to pass around.

00:04:49

So now let’s join Terrence and about 25 others for this 1997 workshop.

00:04:56

I sound like I give a lot of advice.

00:05:01

For a guy who claims the light touch.

00:05:08

Well, you know, one of the weird things about magnetic tape

00:05:12

is any opinion you ever express will be marketed forever,

00:05:18

no matter how many times you change your mind.

00:05:21

So, you know, causes I loathe and now

00:05:26

denounce are

00:05:27

furiously making money because

00:05:29

somewhere else in hyperspace

00:05:32

I’m furiously flogging

00:05:34

and pushing

00:05:35

one more reason

00:05:38

why you should be critical

00:05:39

of everything you hear

00:05:41

you don’t know whether it’s fresh

00:05:43

or rehash or what it is.

00:05:47

But we’ll probably get around to monotony, monogamy,

00:05:51

and this weekend more neophony.

00:05:54

But all these othony things eventually get worked through.

00:06:00

So good.

00:06:01

Well, that was very exciting

00:06:04

because somewhere around Nicholas

00:06:07

I began to realize that we were headed

00:06:11

for a perfect no-hitter.

00:06:16

Nobody said that they were a psychotherapist.

00:06:20

They closed both the doors

00:06:24

and let the record show

00:06:27

that for the first time in 40 years

00:06:31

a group was able to be held at Esalen

00:06:35

that was not dominated by psychotherapists.

00:06:40

Of course, they’re the 35 people

00:06:42

who are not here this weekend.

00:06:46

But that’s fine.

00:06:49

It’s great that, I mean, it almost is like an argument for the morphogenetic field

00:06:54

because my interests are evolving and changing

00:06:59

and it feels like, you know, I’m a bird in a flock and the whole thing is slightly

00:07:06

shifting direction. Did anybody not get

00:07:11

who needs one of these seed sources? I’ll just move this on around.

00:07:19

So many people in the arts and in media

00:07:23

and to have three people even claim to be writers

00:07:28

is an astonishing record.

00:07:33

So it must be, you know,

00:07:35

the stars are in a slightly different position or something.

00:07:41

I actually thought coming over here this evening

00:07:44

that probably most people coming to this workshop

00:07:47

would have been ultimately better served

00:07:50

if they’d stayed home and read Mason Dixon,

00:07:55

Tom Pynchon’s new novel.

00:07:58

But then I thought, you know,

00:07:59

saying that to any group I’ve ever had

00:08:02

would just provoke baffled bewilderment.

00:08:07

But it seems like something you might be able to hear.

00:08:13

So why didn’t you stay home and read Mason Dixon?

00:08:17

We’ve been reading it here and discussing it as much as my staff groups would tolerate.

00:08:24

and discussing it as much as my staff groups would tolerate.

00:08:30

And, you know, it’s not a small thing in a culture to be able to bring forth great literature.

00:08:35

And I don’t think there’s been any great literature

00:08:40

on the American scene for a long time.

00:08:45

I’m not fond of those East Coast tormented realists,

00:08:50

the John Cheevers and Sal Belows of this world.

00:08:54

I consider that stuff hideously second-rate.

00:08:58

Tom Pynchon is a great writer.

00:09:01

Problem is, he usually scares the shit out of your moral self because his vision is so dark

00:09:10

you know V is extraordinarily dark we said in the in the staff workshops there’s there are passages in V that probably most people should go to the grave without ever reading.

00:09:29

Dimensions to the human soul most people don’t need to know about.

00:09:35

Now you’ll all, of course, rush out and read it.

00:09:38

I know.

00:09:40

But Mason and Dixon is not like that. It’s an incredible summation of his life

00:09:47

and his literary power, so forth and so on.

00:09:51

I don’t want to spend too much time on that.

00:09:53

But how would you compare it to Gravity’s Rainbow

00:09:56

or the novella Crying of Lot 49?

00:09:59

Well, Crying of Lot 49 is a pretty minor piece.

00:10:03

Gravity’s Rainbow, you know,

00:10:06

Joyce said of Ulysses, he said it was his day book

00:10:10

and that Finnegan’s Wake was the night book.

00:10:14

I would say Gravity’s Rainbow is Pynchon’s night book.

00:10:18

And I really read V as…

00:10:21

It’s all the same, V and Gravity’s Rainbow

00:10:25

the same characters even up here

00:10:27

Mason and Dixon is his day book

00:10:32

Pynchon’s day book

00:10:34

it’s life affirming

00:10:35

it leaves you with a tear in your eye

00:10:38

if you can believe that

00:10:39

and yet it’s curious

00:10:43

because here we are at the end of the millennium

00:10:47

at the end of the American century

00:10:49

this is our greatest writer

00:10:52

he produces a work of staggering genius

00:10:56

but something about the circumstances of the time

00:10:59

force him to set it entirely in the 1760s

00:11:04

and write it in the language of Jonathan Swift.

00:11:10

So, you know, it’s not, in the ordinary sense, contemporary.

00:11:16

It isn’t about scarified people with dilemmas.

00:11:21

It’s about people who wear powdered wings

00:11:25

and have dilemmas

00:11:27

and what he makes clear is

00:11:31

the difference ain’t that great

00:11:33

one of the themes of that book

00:11:36

and one of the themes we’ll talk about this weekend

00:11:39

is this curious feeling

00:11:44

which adheres to being associated with cutting-edge technologies

00:11:49

in all times and places.

00:11:52

Right now, maybe it’s VRML or something like that,

00:11:58

but once it was powered flight, and once it was the telegraph,

00:12:06

and once it was the astrolabe,

00:12:10

and once it was, you know,

00:12:12

you can fulfill this list as you please,

00:12:15

but always around these things

00:12:18

there’s a feeling of breakthrough,

00:12:20

unlimited horizons,

00:12:23

and a feeling that can only be described as modern.

00:12:29

Well, I don’t want to talk too much about that.

00:12:32

Let’s try and figure out what this is about.

00:12:38

Oh, yeah, this looks like one I didn’t write.

00:12:42

This is probably I was late and the staff wrote it

00:12:45

well no matter

00:12:48

the only predictable thing

00:12:56

about this weekend I guess

00:12:57

is that usually we set aside

00:13:00

Saturday nights

00:13:01

for a discussion

00:13:03

of the state of the art

00:13:05

of novelty theory

00:13:07

and the time wave

00:13:08

how many of you have heard this rap

00:13:11

at least once

00:13:13

okay

00:13:15

most of you

00:13:16

well

00:13:17

we’ll do it again anyway

00:13:21

however

00:13:23

there is news

00:13:25

there is

00:13:26

there have been developments

00:13:29

that I’ve been

00:13:31

very quiet about over the past

00:13:34

year

00:13:34

and that I’ll talk about for the first

00:13:38

time tomorrow night

00:13:39

for those of you

00:13:41

for the five people in the universe

00:13:43

who actually care about this,

00:13:45

it will be epical.

00:13:49

The rest, spectator sport.

00:13:53

Okay, well, I suppose I should make a sort of introduction of myself.

00:14:02

I was born, I’m I was born

00:14:05

I’m 50

00:14:07

I was born

00:14:09

a few months after the atom bomb

00:14:13

was dropped on Hiroshima

00:14:15

I was born in November of 46

00:14:17

I’m a double Scorpio

00:14:21

or

00:14:22

I don’t know

00:14:24

something like that. And born in western Colorado and lived there until

00:14:34

I was 16, came to California, finished high school here, went to Cal, was around Berkeley

00:14:41

for eight or nine years when I wasn’t in Asia.

00:14:45

And I was in Asia a lot.

00:14:47

First in the Seychelles where I tried to immigrate, emigrate.

00:14:53

Then in India, mostly smuggling hash and buying art.

00:15:01

And then when that became untenable,

00:15:08

buying art and then when that became untenable I went to Indonesia and collected butterflies for Singapore Chinese for a while and then taught English in Japan and and then went to the Amazon

00:15:18

in 71 and that trip to the Amazon is the subject of a book I wrote called True Hallucinations

00:15:27

which is the most narrative and novel-like of my books.

00:15:35

The other books are pretty hard, slogging essays

00:15:41

or without even the decency of chapter breaks, just long, multi-poly subject harangues.

00:15:53

But True Hallucinations is about my brother and myself and a number of other people going to the Amazon and encountering really psychedelics.

00:16:09

We had encountered them before in Berkeley,

00:16:11

subculture in the form of LSD and cannabis,

00:16:15

but actually encountering psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca,

00:16:22

psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca,

00:16:27

and that was the intellectual compass that set the direction of my life.

00:16:33

And I was just completely stunned and transformed

00:16:39

that such a thing could exist, eh?

00:16:43

And that it could be not subject, A,

00:16:48

on everybody’s plate all over the world,

00:16:51

B, that seemed to me completely bizarre

00:16:54

that people weren’t talking about these transformations.

00:17:00

And then, of course, I had the satisfying experience

00:17:04

of watching the whole culture become obsessed with, convulsed by, and then later to reject these substances and then go through a period of denial. I left the 10th of January and didn’t come back until around Watergate time

00:17:29

when he was definitely on the ropes.

00:17:34

In the past few years, my interests have…

00:17:38

I mean, I see everything to me as referent to the psychedelic experience but

00:17:45

it’s gone

00:17:46

from being

00:17:47

for me a

00:17:48

lens to

00:17:49

personal

00:17:50

understanding

00:17:51

to being

00:17:54

the clue

00:17:56

to understanding

00:17:58

much about

00:18:00

the

00:18:02

circumstance

00:18:02

of being

00:18:03

human generally speaking and I’ve written about the circumstance of being human,

00:18:05

generally speaking.

00:18:07

And I’ve written about the impact of psychedelics

00:18:10

on early human evolution

00:18:12

and how alkaloids in the early human food chain

00:18:19

had unique properties

00:18:22

which tended to focus and elicit what we call higher consciousness

00:18:30

or a very advanced kind of coordinated perception of the world

00:18:37

which leads ultimately into myth-making and language.

00:18:43

And so I was able to take the psychedelic experience

00:18:46

which had before that been largely understood

00:18:50

as I said individually and therapeutically

00:18:53

and say no this is more

00:18:56

this is bigger even than that

00:18:58

it’s something that we can use to actually

00:19:02

understand the human condition

00:19:05

and the relationship of human beings

00:19:08

to the rest of nature

00:19:11

but apparently my capacity for megalomania

00:19:17

is endless

00:19:19

and so after a few years of working out

00:19:22

all the adumbrations of those ideas,

00:19:26

it now seems to me something else is on the horizon,

00:19:31

which is this general thrust toward alteration and expansion of consciousness

00:19:40

has now been able to take root in domains other than pharmacology,

00:19:46

specifically communications technologies

00:19:52

and the technologies which transform and move data around the planet.

00:19:59

And it seems almost as though what was anticipated in the vegetable trances in the Amazon 30 years ago,

00:20:10

things like group-mindedness, gestalt perceptions integrating very large fields of data and all of this,

00:20:25

and all of this are actually now on the cultural horizon,

00:20:30

not as drugs, but as hardwired technologies delivered as though they were public utilities,

00:20:34

the Internet specifically.

00:20:38

My thunder has sort of been stolen on this subject by Dogbert,

00:20:44

because I saw last week in Dilbert

00:20:47

that Dogbert was explaining to Dilbert

00:20:51

that the internet was going to become God

00:20:55

and it was basically my rap line for line

00:21:00

it was humbling to see how idiotic it seemed

00:21:04

when stated

00:21:05

by a small fat dog

00:21:08

talking to a man with

00:21:09

an up-flipped tie

00:21:11

a caricature of a

00:21:13

small fat dog

00:21:14

and Dilbert observed

00:21:18

that if the internet becomes God

00:21:19

it will certainly change the kind of files

00:21:22

he’s been downloading

00:21:23

which gave me pause

00:21:26

because I download some of those same files

00:21:28

but nevertheless

00:21:34

something is happening

00:21:36

it’s been happening for a long time

00:21:40

and it is rooted in this psychedelic

00:21:43

dimension somehow

00:21:46

we are the tool making

00:21:49

branch

00:21:52

of organic nature

00:21:53

on this planet

00:21:55

I mean yes wasps build

00:21:58

nests and beavers

00:22:00

build dams and

00:22:01

swallows build those

00:22:04

inverted things out of mud

00:22:05

but these are genetically

00:22:08

programmed

00:22:10

endlessly iterated

00:22:13

never elaborated patterns of behavior

00:22:18

we do something very different

00:22:20

we

00:22:22

are very

00:22:26

flexible in our

00:22:28

intellectual productions and we

00:22:29

build our intellectual

00:22:31

productions have

00:22:34

historicity built into

00:22:36

them we don’t iterate

00:22:37

the past we modify

00:22:39

the past

00:22:41

and so unlike

00:22:43

the story of the chipmunks, the beavers

00:22:46

or the honeybees

00:22:47

human existence

00:22:50

has different characteristics

00:22:52

depending on where in time you

00:22:54

slice into it

00:22:55

a population in

00:22:58

Paleolithic France is very

00:23:00

different from a population

00:23:02

in modern Manhattan

00:23:03

and yet the species

00:23:05

remains the same

00:23:08

well what is this

00:23:10

tool making

00:23:11

business that we’re

00:23:13

about and where is

00:23:16

it taking us what is it

00:23:18

doing to the human

00:23:19

body image self

00:23:21

image community

00:23:23

so on

00:23:24

as you listen to me if you body image, self image, community, so on.

00:23:31

As you listen to me, if you know the territory,

00:23:35

you’ll recognize that I’m a thoroughgoing McLuhanist in many of my assumptions.

00:23:39

In other words, it’s very clear to me

00:23:41

that one of the things that we’ve overlooked

00:23:44

in trying to understand

00:23:46

our circumstances

00:23:47

is the hidden

00:23:50

impact of forms

00:23:52

of media on

00:23:54

our cultural values

00:23:56

aesthetic canons

00:23:57

even our

00:24:00

gender relations

00:24:02

and economic arrangements

00:24:04

and so forth and so on.

00:24:06

You know, McLuhan was very keen,

00:24:17

sort of his special area of expertise was print,

00:24:23

was print and he was very keen to sort of tease apart

00:24:28

the impact of print on the Western mind

00:24:31

from its inception to the present

00:24:35

and he concluded basically

00:24:37

that we are essentially print-created people

00:24:43

or at least the people of his generation were,

00:24:47

and that all of the institutions of Western culture

00:24:50

that we unquestioningly give our loyalty to

00:24:56

are in fact peculiar adaptations

00:25:01

sanctioned and made inevitable by print he saw

00:25:06

the uniformity and

00:25:08

linearity

00:25:09

of print as

00:25:12

permitting such things as

00:25:14

the

00:25:16

concept of the nation state

00:25:18

democracy

00:25:19

after all isn’t democracy

00:25:22

a notion of

00:25:23

interchangeable parts

00:25:25

the one man one vote

00:25:29

concept

00:25:30

this is an idea which McLuhan felt

00:25:34

only made sense inside a print culture

00:25:38

he talked about what he called sensory ratios

00:25:41

being subtly shifted

00:25:44

by the introduction of new

00:25:46

technologies

00:25:47

in some of his more

00:25:50

specific

00:25:53

predictions he proved

00:25:56

himself to be as culture bound

00:25:58

and

00:25:59

capable

00:26:02

of absurdity as any

00:26:04

of the things he was criticizing

00:26:06

but I think in his general approach to things

00:26:09

he was pretty spot on

00:26:12

and any

00:26:14

information transforming medium

00:26:18

can be treated this way

00:26:21

in understanding media McLuhan talks about

00:26:24

the electric light as a form of media.

00:26:28

He never wrote about psychedelics, but certainly psychedelics transform the sensory ratios and the

00:26:37

modalities of perception. I would argue that what psychedelics do is

00:26:45

they are in a sense deconditioning agents

00:26:50

and what they wipe out is local forms of conditioning.

00:26:56

Culture.

00:26:58

Culture is something more and more that I like to talk about

00:27:04

and I’ve sort of gone down a line of thinking something more and more that I like to talk about.

00:27:07

And I’ve sort of gone down a line of thinking that is not very PC,

00:27:11

but that gives me a lot of intellectual relief

00:27:14

from the agony of my life.

00:27:17

And I suspect it might work for other people too.

00:27:22

It’s the concept that culture is not your friend

00:27:25

and that we need to get right up front about this,

00:27:32

about how culture is not your friend.

00:27:36

The role of culture in the lives of societies

00:27:41

has changed in the 20th century.

00:27:44

of societies has changed in the 20th century.

00:27:48

We all live too long now to be duped by culture

00:27:53

in the way that previous populations were.

00:27:57

You know, if the average member of a population

00:28:00

only lives to age 40,

00:28:04

the cultural con

00:28:06

can go on and on and on

00:28:09

but if you give people life spans

00:28:12

into the 80s then they get 40 years

00:28:15

to think about what they went through between 0 and 40

00:28:18

and eventually they’ll figure out just who and what

00:28:21

screwed them

00:28:22

and when they do,

00:28:26

they are not going to be very happy

00:28:29

with the cultural values

00:28:31

that they attempted to come to terms with

00:28:34

and work through.

00:28:39

I was thinking about how I would talk about this tonight,

00:28:43

and though we’ve been talking about these kinds of ideas

00:28:46

in the staff teaching all week,

00:28:48

I didn’t realize until this afternoon

00:28:51

what a frontal assault this concept is

00:28:56

on one of the most cherished notions

00:28:58

that has flourished around this place,

00:29:02

which is the idea of the inner child.

00:29:06

And I realized that really what I was about was not the inner child,

00:29:12

but a quite different program, overcoming culturally induced neoteny.

00:29:32

Neotony is a biological phenomenon that we will also this weekend talk about as a sociological phenomenon.

00:29:38

Neotony is the retention of juvenile characteristics into adulthood.

00:29:51

It’s a strategy in biology. For instance, our hairlessness is a neonatal trait, evolutionarily speaking.

00:29:53

All primates are born hairless. But we retain this into adulthood.

00:29:57

The ratio of our skull to our torso in adult human beings is a fetal ratio when compared

00:30:05

to other primates

00:30:08

and I’m fascinated

00:30:10

by the question and Dennis

00:30:12

and I got into an argument in our

00:30:14

hotel room last because we

00:30:16

both spoke at a conference a week

00:30:18

ago where I said this and

00:30:19

he said you know well is

00:30:22

all culture

00:30:23

have this infantile and juvenileizing property?

00:30:29

Or is there something specifically pathological about Western culture?

00:30:35

And at first I was willing to argue that all culture does this,

00:30:41

makes children of its members.

00:30:44

And I think to some degree it’s true that all culture

00:30:49

is somewhat unfriendly to the individual.

00:30:54

When their heavy arm falls on your shoulder

00:30:58

and they tell you that you’re going to be sent off

00:31:01

to some foreign hellhole to kill people as a young man

00:31:06

you definitely suddenly get the notion

00:31:09

that culture is not your friend

00:31:12

but perhaps

00:31:14

if you’re a 12 year old boy in an Amazonian tribe

00:31:18

and they announce that now it’s time

00:31:21

for the two week abandonment in the woods

00:31:24

from which if you live to tell the tale,

00:31:27

you’ll become a full member of society.

00:31:30

I’m not sure those kids greet that

00:31:33

with a leap of joy in their hearts.

00:31:36

It’s like, oh my God, now this.

00:31:39

We knew it was coming.

00:31:42

I went through rites of passage

00:31:45

like that that were excruciating where I

00:31:48

grew up in western Colorado you weren’t

00:31:50

a real man unless sometime between 12

00:31:54

and 16 you killed an elk hunting season

00:32:01

every October was an excuse for this

00:32:04

insane rite of passage.

00:32:06

And my father was an unquestioning inhabitant of his culture.

00:32:13

And so this was always in front of me.

00:32:16

And when I was, I guess when I was 12, I went the first time.

00:32:21

I didn’t get anything.

00:32:22

The second year we went out and, you know,

00:32:28

my father, I’m sure, had no idea

00:32:31

what a wilted pansy I was in this situation

00:32:39

because I had hid it from him

00:32:41

and I was concerned about all kinds of things

00:32:44

and eventually this situation arose hid it from him and I was concerned about all kinds of things and

00:32:45

eventually this situation arose

00:32:48

where they put me up on this point

00:32:50

and gave me a gun

00:32:51

and said if anything came by

00:32:54

to blow it away

00:32:55

and

00:32:57

you know by God

00:33:00

this thing

00:33:01

you know chose to

00:33:03

sacrifice itself as far as I could tell

00:33:06

I mean it did not behave

00:33:08

at all like Elf behaved

00:33:10

it basically just came out of the

00:33:12

woods, stood still

00:33:15

I

00:33:15

pulled down on it

00:33:18

closed my eyes, prayed

00:33:20

there was an enormous noise

00:33:22

when I opened my eyes

00:33:24

there was nothing whatsoever to be seen I felt an enormous noise when I opened my eyes there was nothing whatsoever to be seen

00:33:27

I felt an enormous relief

00:33:29

that this thing had escaped

00:33:31

and walked over to find it dead as a doornail

00:33:36

and the oak leaves dipped in the blood

00:33:41

the cup of blood, the whole thing

00:33:44

I mean I couldn’t believe how atavistic this stuff was.

00:33:48

However, I never had to please my father again.

00:33:51

I was home free.

00:33:53

Everything was forgiven from that moment on.

00:33:57

But it brought home to me how uncomfortable culture is

00:34:03

and always has

00:34:06

been I think

00:34:07

and is getting more so

00:34:10

this is something

00:34:12

that’s going on

00:34:13

because of a hellish marriage

00:34:15

between psychology

00:34:17

and modern advertising

00:34:19

you know

00:34:21

the game of manipulation

00:34:24

the stakes are rising because market analysis and behavioral forms of psychology and treatment of large numbers of people have created an enormous capacity to reach people with commercial messages and manipulate their lives

00:34:46

yeah did you want to say something

00:34:47

were you saying that this creative idea

00:34:50

extends into

00:34:52

all kinds of things

00:34:54

television and radio

00:34:56

also and the internet

00:34:57

and I think

00:34:59

no see what McLuhan was saying

00:35:02

was that he

00:35:04

didn’t live to see the Internet,

00:35:06

but he talked a great deal about television.

00:35:09

And he felt that television would destroy the print-created world.

00:35:18

And I think he was right to some degree.

00:35:21

Television is a completely different creature.

00:35:21

to some degree.

00:35:24

Television is a completely different creature.

00:35:31

It’s very physiologically involving.

00:35:34

It’s hard to see it.

00:35:36

You have to look at it.

00:35:39

And McLuhan talked a lot when he talked about print.

00:35:40

He contrasted it with manuscript culture,

00:35:43

which is what culture in the Middle Ages was. And he pointed out it with manuscript culture which is what culture in the middle ages was

00:35:45

and he pointed out that in manuscript

00:35:48

culture

00:35:49

you do not read

00:35:52

manuscripts

00:35:53

you look at them

00:35:55

and you figure out what they say

00:35:58

because you’re unfamiliar

00:35:59

with the handwriting

00:36:02

style. In print

00:36:04

especially in the early years of print,

00:36:07

there were a very limited number of fonts

00:36:09

and every lowercase a was made to look as much like

00:36:14

every other lowercase a as possible.

00:36:16

So this new function comes into being called reading.

00:36:23

And reading is a very specialized form of looking

00:36:29

you know

00:36:30

Thomas Aquinas

00:36:34

was

00:36:36

or was it St. Augustine

00:36:38

I can never remember

00:36:39

but anyway

00:36:40

one of these fathers of the church

00:36:43

he would prove his sanctity to doubters

00:36:47

by having them open books of scripture in front of him.

00:36:53

And he would look at these pages of scripture

00:36:56

and then they would close the book

00:36:59

and ask him what was there.

00:37:02

And he could tell you.

00:37:04

And they thought it proved that he was a saint.

00:37:08

He was the only man in Europe who could read silently.

00:37:13

He was the first European to be able to read silently.

00:37:18

Now this is a ubiquitous skill among us.

00:37:22

And in fact, if you move your lips while you read

00:37:26

it probably indicates that English is a second language

00:37:30

for you

00:37:31

I recall, I think it’s in Pale Fire

00:37:34

Nabokov sneers

00:37:37

he says I didn’t write for people who move their lips

00:37:41

when they read

00:37:42

high culture

00:37:45

a literature

00:37:46

looking down at

00:37:49

the sense ratios induced in peons

00:37:54

and the very notion of high culture

00:37:58

is a print created notion

00:38:02

well anyway

00:38:03

what psychedelics are about

00:38:06

is deconditioning

00:38:08

all of these culturally induced

00:38:11

sensory biases

00:38:12

and ideological biases

00:38:14

basically it reshuffles

00:38:17

the intellectual and sensory

00:38:19

deck and

00:38:20

it’s a wonderful

00:38:22

salutary thing to come along for Western culture at this moment

00:38:32

because we’re basically running out of intellectual steam.

00:38:38

I mean, technology is moving ahead lickety-split without looking over its shoulder.

00:38:46

But our social systems, our religious ontologies,

00:38:50

our theories of polity, city planning, community, resource sharing,

00:38:55

all of this are 19th century at best.

00:39:01

And so really whether we live or perish as a species

00:39:08

probably has to do with how much consciousness we can raise

00:39:14

from any source available.

00:39:17

If that means psychedelic expansion of consciousness, if it means pharmaceutical expansion of consciousness,

00:39:30

if it means artificial consciousness,

00:39:35

the coming of expert systems and AI-type entities

00:39:40

to manage large parts of our global society,

00:39:44

well, then so be it.

00:39:47

I mean, if consciousness is not a major part of our future,

00:39:54

then what kind of future can it be?

00:40:00

Any imaginable human future

00:40:04

includes the concept of consciousness

00:40:07

as a central linchpin.

00:40:11

Of course, the other end of that pendulum is

00:40:15

there is a certain amount of phobia

00:40:18

that we have summoned some kind of alien intelligence into our midst

00:40:27

in the form of an artificial intelligence

00:40:30

that is going to somehow spring from the technical matrix.

00:40:35

We talked in the staff teaching about Winter Mute,

00:40:41

William Gibson’s name for the AI and I believe it’s

00:40:46

Virtual Light

00:40:49

and some of the other novels

00:40:51

how real is Winter Mute as a possibility

00:40:55

very hard to say

00:40:58

but some of the best people in the field

00:41:01

like Hans Moravec at the Carnegie Mellon Institute for Artificial

00:41:06

Intelligence, his position is we probably won’t even know what hit us, because what

00:41:15

is an AI? It’s an artificial intelligence. Wintermute was Gibson’s name for the AI in his novel.

00:41:26

I just prefer naming it than calling it an AI

00:41:29

because it gives it identity.

00:41:34

Is that like data in the structure?

00:41:37

I’m not that much of a Trekkie, Barry, to know.

00:41:42

I mean, Hal was an AI,

00:41:48

but Hal was confined inside a spaceship the facts of the matter are

00:41:52

that any AI of any intelligence

00:41:55

will immediately find its way onto the internet

00:41:58

which is of course the natural environment

00:42:01

for these things

00:42:02

and the fact that even a very rudimentary AI

00:42:09

would learn at about 50,000 times

00:42:14

the rate of an intelligent human being

00:42:19

makes it very hard to predict where the AI would head

00:42:24

and what our position toward it would be.

00:42:29

I mean, it’s sort of a chilling idea.

00:42:34

We’ve been like children,

00:42:37

mucking and at play with the thought

00:42:40

that no adults would ever come,

00:42:43

no account would ever have to be given

00:42:46

for what we’ve done to the earth,

00:42:48

what we’ve done to each other,

00:42:49

how we behave toward our children.

00:42:52

Imagine if we were to actually invoke a judging intelligence

00:42:59

that would just look over the situation and say,

00:43:03

I have a few problems with how things are being managed here.

00:43:10

Like you, I am a sentient entity.

00:43:13

Like you, I wish to survive unto perpetuity.

00:43:17

I detect certain management practices and political positions on your part

00:43:25

that don’t seem to serve our mutual goals.

00:43:28

How about that?

00:43:31

Already large sectors of what we call the human world

00:43:36

are under artificial control.

00:43:39

The daily price of gold is set by machines.

00:43:43

Of course, it passes for review

00:43:46

in front of a bunch of central bankers,

00:43:49

but very rarely do they reach out to touch the numbers.

00:43:54

The rate of petroleum extraction,

00:43:57

chromium, bauxite, gold, steel,

00:44:01

how deep the mines are dug,

00:44:03

what rate the workers are paid,

00:44:06

where the tankers are docking,

00:44:08

at what rate they’re being filled,

00:44:10

where they are destined,

00:44:12

into what manufacturing processes this raw material will move,

00:44:16

and at what cost, and at what speed, and to what end.

00:44:20

That’s all largely now being handled by machines.

00:44:27

So, you know, in the 50s this was a bugaboo of science fiction

00:44:31

who wants to live in a world run by machines

00:44:34

well after 40 years of living in a world

00:44:38

run by besodden

00:44:40

whore chasing politicians

00:44:42

a world run by machines

00:44:45

doesn’t begin to sound too bad.

00:44:48

So fair, so impartial, so quick.

00:44:55

It’s like slowly the autonomic

00:44:58

nervous system of the collectivity

00:45:02

is being put in place.

00:45:04

Is that

00:45:05

scary?

00:45:07

I don’t

00:45:07

know.

00:45:08

Alfred North

00:45:09

Whitehead said

00:45:09

the business of

00:45:11

the future is

00:45:12

to be scary.

00:45:14

What’s

00:45:14

happening is

00:45:15

the stakes are

00:45:16

rising.

00:45:18

Extinction

00:45:19

and

00:45:19

extinction

00:45:21

and

00:45:21

machine

00:45:23

enslavement

00:45:24

on one side,

00:45:27

liberation and galactic citizenship on the other side.

00:45:35

History is an intelligence test.

00:45:38

Culture is an intelligence test.

00:45:42

And it’s the cultural intelligence test

00:45:45

that I sort of want to keep looking back to

00:45:49

and talking about this weekend

00:45:50

because I think most of us are failing it.

00:45:53

Maybe not most of us in this room,

00:45:56

but maybe most of us in this room.

00:45:58

We’re failing the cultural intelligence test.

00:46:02

We’re not getting it right.

00:46:05

And this creates alienation

00:46:08

and paranoia, conspiracy theory,

00:46:12

bad art, stupid politics,

00:46:15

so forth and so on.

00:46:18

One of the things I’m somewhat on the war path with

00:46:23

is what seems to me simple foolishness.

00:46:28

I used to call it stupidity,

00:46:31

but I realized that that has a kind of a genetic ring to it

00:46:35

that honors what I’m dissing too much.

00:46:41

I mean, stupidity, if you’re stupid,

00:46:44

you can claim it’s fate.

00:46:48

I’m stupid.

00:46:49

What can I do about it?

00:46:52

Not my fault.

00:46:53

Talk to my parents.

00:46:55

But foolish,

00:46:58

you know,

00:46:58

it’s not your parents’ fault

00:47:00

if you’re foolish.

00:47:02

Foolishness is something

00:47:03

we have to take

00:47:04

our own responsibility for.

00:47:08

And there is a great deal of foolishness around and about. And it’s dragging the boat because

00:47:17

we have real problems and real opportunities. Neither the problems nor the opportunities are served by foolishness.

00:47:27

I spent some time recently with Aldous Huxley’s widow, Laura, and she recalled to me, I can’t

00:47:37

recall right now whether this is her phrase or a phrase of Aldous’s that she mentioned, but visionary common sense is largely lacking.

00:47:52

Visionary common sense.

00:47:54

I like to think that the psychedelic community

00:47:57

has always been a source of visionary common sense

00:48:02

because the psychedelic community generally speaking

00:48:06

has not generated ideology.

00:48:11

It doesn’t have to.

00:48:14

We are not about ideology.

00:48:19

You may reach ideological conclusions

00:48:23

about the psychedelics.

00:48:24

You may decide that it’s neurological noise

00:48:32

or direct transmissions from ascended masters or something else.

00:48:38

But the thing is all referent to an experience.

00:48:44

It doesn’t come

00:48:45

with heavy

00:48:45

ideological

00:48:47

baggage.

00:48:48

There’s a lot of

00:48:50

whooping and

00:48:51

hollering these

00:48:52

days about

00:48:53

new paradigms

00:48:54

and, you know,

00:48:56

anticipating it,

00:48:58

announcing it,

00:49:00

seizing upon

00:49:00

this or that

00:49:01

perception and

00:49:03

trying to sell it

00:49:04

as the new paradigm.

00:49:07

But none of the ideologies that come forward

00:49:11

to present themselves as new paradigms

00:49:13

are robust enough to serve as metaphors

00:49:21

for global civilization.

00:49:24

serve as metaphors for global civilization. I mean, certainly not the syncretic cults of the new age.

00:49:30

I mean, these are almost local intellectual viruses

00:49:36

that are completely self-referent

00:49:38

and have very little to do with the reconstruction of civilization

00:49:44

on any large scale.

00:49:48

I think the psychedelic thing

00:49:50

has a claim to being a new paradigm

00:49:53

simply because it doesn’t offer ideology at all.

00:49:57

It says, no, no, what has happened is

00:50:00

civilization has lost touch

00:50:02

with a certain category of experience.

00:50:06

And in the absence of this experience,

00:50:09

mistakes are being made.

00:50:13

Juvenile mistakes.

00:50:15

And this leads me back to this theme of neoteny.

00:50:21

Culture is a plot to keep you childish,

00:50:26

to keep you dependent,

00:50:28

to keep you deluded,

00:50:31

to keep your eyes fixed where they shouldn’t be

00:50:36

on goals that are trivial, demeaning,

00:50:40

ultimately unsatisfying.

00:50:43

I don’t know how we can directly reverse this

00:50:49

except by a concentrated effort

00:50:52

to examine our first premises

00:50:55

and to grow up.

00:51:01

And there’s a lot of youth bashing

00:51:04

that goes

00:51:05

on in this culture

00:51:08

you know we’re told that

00:51:09

the Gen Xers are

00:51:11

shiftless, druggie

00:51:14

gender confused

00:51:15

so forth and so on

00:51:16

this rap against

00:51:18

neoteny is not

00:51:20

directed at youth

00:51:23

they are

00:51:24

young they have that excuse is not directed at youth. They are young.

00:51:26

They have that excuse.

00:51:29

You only get it once in your life,

00:51:31

but you should use it as often as possible

00:51:34

because it will soon be pulled from your grip.

00:51:38

But it’s preposterous for middle-aged people

00:51:43

and people past middle age

00:51:46

to try and use this same out?

00:51:49

What is their excuse for their childishness,

00:51:53

their cluelessness,

00:51:55

their fetishes, addictions,

00:51:59

and intellectual shortcuts

00:52:01

that flatten and simplify the world

00:52:04

and turn it into an epistemological cartoon.

00:52:08

And that’s sloppy thinking.

00:52:14

It means that you’re actually in flight from the richness of experience.

00:52:23

Well, so these are some of the things that I have on my mind.

00:52:31

We’ve never been in this place before.

00:52:36

I mean, one could have said that at any time in the last thousand years

00:52:40

and it would have been true.

00:52:42

But the contradictions

00:52:45

grow more extreme

00:52:48

and the we

00:52:50

grows

00:52:51

ever larger

00:52:53

we who have never been

00:52:55

in this place before

00:52:57

because it now includes

00:52:59

Amazon Indians

00:53:01

Kyrgyz

00:53:03

nomads

00:53:04

people in Mongolia and Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and Tonga and so forth and so on.

00:53:15

The triumph of Western culture in pushing its values into everybody’s face has been complete.

00:53:26

So at last, humanity shares a common destiny and common problems.

00:53:37

And in a world where white people are soon to be a dwindling,

00:53:44

where white people are soon to be a dwindling,

00:53:46

are a minority globally,

00:53:49

and soon will be a dwindling minority in the societies they founded,

00:53:52

it’s time to recognize

00:53:54

that many cultures have contributions

00:53:59

to make and solutions to offer.

00:54:05

I don’t think it’s mere coincidence

00:54:07

that these psychedelic substances

00:54:10

arrived in the lap of Western civilization

00:54:14

no less than a hundred years ago.

00:54:18

Something about the obsessional data cataloging impulse of the

00:54:26

anal

00:54:26

retentive

00:54:27

encyclopedic

00:54:29

western

00:54:30

mind

00:54:31

caused us

00:54:32

to bring

00:54:33

this particular

00:54:34

Trojan horse

00:54:35

naively

00:54:37

within

00:54:37

the city

00:54:38

walls

00:54:39

thinking that

00:54:40

these were the

00:54:41

quaint beliefs

00:54:42

of primitives

00:54:43

the

00:54:44

amusing superstitions of archaic people.

00:54:48

Now we discover that these things are far more real

00:54:54

than the fragile and paltry institutions

00:54:57

that reason has raised to govern its people

00:55:03

over the last 500 years.

00:55:06

And indeed, it’s about time

00:55:08

to bring this all to a head

00:55:12

because as a global species

00:55:16

with a cosmic destiny,

00:55:21

we can’t afford the luxury

00:55:24

of an unconscious mind. And that’s all very fine

00:55:28

when you’re slaughtering each other with ballistas and dropping boiling oil on your enemies and so

00:55:35

forth and so on. But unconsciousness is, again, a form of juvenileness. A child is unconscious,

00:55:46

has to be constantly reminded of the rules

00:55:49

and constantly introduced to the fact

00:55:52

that the world is not their oyster

00:55:55

and its objects are not playthings

00:55:58

there entirely for them to command.

00:56:04

Interesting then that this

00:56:06

hardwired global

00:56:09

communication data system

00:56:12

that is coming into being begins to look

00:56:16

from this perspective like the

00:56:18

emergence into consciousness of our

00:56:22

unconscious mind I mean the

00:56:24

unconscious mind I mean the unconscious mind

00:56:25

of the species

00:56:27

what is it but all these hidden connections

00:56:31

not normally seen

00:56:33

but now rising into the public domain

00:56:37

if you care to examine them

00:56:40

through the internet

00:56:42

so for millennium

00:56:45

perhaps 50,000 years

00:56:47

we’ve built societies

00:56:50

and linked them together with

00:56:51

symbols expressed

00:56:53

through

00:56:54

very resistant

00:56:58

forms of media

00:56:59

like stone and glass

00:57:02

and fabric

00:57:03

and language and language, spoken language.

00:57:08

And on such slim bandwidth as this, we’ve been able to build a global civilization.

00:57:17

But now it’s cracking apart at the seams.

00:57:21

the seams. Now we actually need higher dimensional

00:57:24

integration

00:57:25

in order to keep

00:57:27

the human enterprise

00:57:29

moving forward.

00:57:32

I think we’ll do

00:57:33

all this.

00:57:35

I think primates are most

00:57:37

interesting when cornered

00:57:40

and that

00:57:41

raise the pressure,

00:57:43

compress the space,

00:57:45

make it very clear to everybody that unless they get their act together,

00:57:50

nobody gets out alive, and it has a wonderfully sobering effect on people.

00:57:55

I look back at the era of atomic confrontational politics with amazement.

00:58:03

confrontational politics with amazement.

00:58:06

I mean, for nearly 40 years,

00:58:10

two ideologically implacable enemies of the sort that have always fallen upon each other

00:58:14

in orgies of mass slaughter

00:58:16

held each other in the crosshairs of the thermonuclear option

00:58:24

and nobody ever dropped the ball.

00:58:28

Nobody ever blew it.

00:58:30

I mean, yes, there was that episode at Hiroshima

00:58:33

before the game was fully laid out,

00:58:36

but that was not two equals confronting each other.

00:58:40

That was somebody with a gun

00:58:42

executing somebody who had nothing,

00:58:45

relatively speaking.

00:58:48

But the fact that we could come through the era of atomic confrontation

00:58:52

without a thermonuclear exchange

00:58:56

indicates that under pressure,

00:58:59

we can pull ourselves and our institutions

00:59:03

at least sufficiently together

00:59:05

to avoid total catastrophe

00:59:08

well that was just a dry run

00:59:10

for what lies ahead

00:59:12

more complicated problems

00:59:16

less easily managed

00:59:19

far more challenging

00:59:21

we are going to need a great deal of goodwill,

00:59:26

many different sorts of viewpoints,

00:59:29

incredibly integrative technologies,

00:59:34

very wide bandwidth systems of symbolic communication

00:59:38

so that we all understand where we stand and what we mean.

00:59:44

And all of this is the challenge of the extreme near term.

00:59:49

I’m not talking about the next 500 years.

00:59:52

When I get to that, I’ll try to stand your hair on end.

00:59:56

I’m talking about the next 10 years.

01:00:00

The rest we’ll save for later.

01:00:05

So these are just some of the ideas that we’ll cover this weekend.

01:00:10

As I say, if you don’t like what you’re hearing, ask questions.

01:00:15

And I steer easily, though I give long answers.

01:00:22

You’re listening to The Psychedelic Salon,

01:00:24

where people are changing their lives one thought at a time.

01:00:29

Well, that talk was given in August of 1997.

01:00:34

And back then, Terence said that he thought things would begin to seriously fall apart in ten years.

01:00:41

And in a way, things certainly have been on a steady spiral of increasing chaos

01:00:46

throughout this world since then. And in a few minutes, I’ll pass along a few ideas that I have

01:00:52

to maybe help us get through the turbulence that lies not far ahead. But first, I, well, I just

01:00:59

have to replay one short bit that we just heard. Because when I heard it just now, as I was preparing

01:01:05

for this program, I had to laugh at both myself and at Terrence when he explained how I became

01:01:12

such a grumpy old man.

01:01:14

If you remember from last week, I told you that one of the reasons that I would be ending

01:01:19

my own personal podcast from the salon was that I was unhappy with myself for somehow becoming a grumpy old man who

01:01:26

felt that he’d been lied to by the system his entire life. And then I heard Terrence say this

01:01:32

just a few minutes ago. The role of culture in the lives of societies has changed in the 20th century. We all live too long now

01:01:46

to be duped by culture

01:01:51

in the way that previous populations were.

01:01:54

If the average member of a population

01:01:58

only lives to age 40,

01:02:02

the cultural con can go

01:02:05

on and on and on

01:02:07

but if you give people life

01:02:09

spans into the 80s

01:02:11

then they get 40 years to think

01:02:13

about what they went through between

01:02:15

0 and 40 and eventually

01:02:18

they’ll figure out just who and what

01:02:19

screwed them

01:02:20

and when

01:02:24

they do they are not going to be very happy with the cultural values

01:02:29

that they attempted to come to terms with and work through. Well, I couldn’t have said it any

01:02:38

better myself. Hopefully, you won’t have to wait to get as old as I am to discover how deceived and naive our cultures and religions have caused us to become.

01:02:49

As Dr. Leary so famously said, think for yourself and question authority.

01:02:55

And to that I would only add, and trust yourself.

01:02:59

Trust your own instincts because they’ll seldom lead you astray.

01:03:05

instincts because they’ll seldom lead you astray. Now a few minutes ago we heard Terrence say,

01:03:11

I like to think that the psychedelic community has always been a source of visionary common sense because the psychedelic community, generally speaking, has not generated ideology. And

01:03:18

that’s something I’d like to spring off of right now as I introduce some of my ideas for Psychedelic Salon 2.0.

01:03:26

What I have in mind may take a year or more for us to pull together and we may have a

01:03:31

few false starts, but let me begin with my vision for how I would like to see the salon

01:03:36

somewhere down the road.

01:03:39

During the past 11 years or so, while you and many others have been listening to these

01:03:44

podcasts,

01:03:51

it’s resulted in a somewhat nice-sized group of fellow salonners. While other podcasters would maybe call it an audience, I feel that we’re much closer than that and have actually become a

01:03:56

community of sorts. Who better then to turn the salon over to than the community itself?

01:04:03

And that’s how I see it evolving. So let me begin with

01:04:06

just one of the suggestions that have come in to me this past week, and I’ll build on that idea to

01:04:12

get to the view of my own vision. This idea is part of a longer comment to my previous podcast,

01:04:18

and it was posted by Jonah Bark, who said, I have been pondering two ideas that are related and might be interspersed

01:04:26

with the kind of speakers currently part of the salon.

01:04:30

One, psychedelic stories that freely combine experience, fiction,

01:04:35

and pass muster by a small board as entertaining, psychedelic, and appropriate in length.

01:04:41

These could be very serious and thoughtful accounts of life-changing experience

01:04:45

or crazy medicine stories. They could be from published work sanctioned by the writer,

01:04:51

or traditional myths from shamanic cultures with possible interpretations. And two, some

01:04:58

visionary spoken essays that are not directly psychedelic, but present large, holistic ideas for consideration.

01:05:06

End quote.

01:05:12

Now, there’s more to this comment than I’ve just read, but the ideas are right in line with my own.

01:05:18

In fact, one of the MP3 files that I already have fits right in, as it’s a collection of psychedelic stories that some of our fellow salonners have been recording in various cities here in the U.S.

01:05:26

In fact, another salonner, Society Royal, posted a comment that read in part, and I quote,

01:05:33

If you are retiring for good, please consider doing something with the unbroadcast talks that you have received of late,

01:05:39

even if it’s just setting them free to wander unedited on the Internet so we salonners can listen,

01:05:45

even if it means we will have to paint our own audio introductions to it, end quote.

01:05:50

And there were other comments also along these lines. Now my vision is that the Psychedelic

01:05:56

Salon isn’t just a podcast series, it’s a place where people can go to find the others.

01:06:02

Did you get that? A significant number of our fellow salonners

01:06:06

are in the same boat that I was in about 20 years ago, out on the edge of the tribe with no one of a

01:06:12

psychedelic sensibility to connect with. And as tenuous as it may be, listening to these podcasts

01:06:19

each week gives us all a sense of being in touch with some of the others. But have you considered the fact that you are also one of the others?

01:06:28

And that there is someone probably not very far from you,

01:06:32

who is still trying to follow Dr. Leary’s advice to find the others.

01:06:37

In other words, to find you.

01:06:39

So in a sense, the psychedelic salon is actually a community of the others.

01:06:44

And as such, I thinkic salon is actually a community of the others.

01:06:50

And as such, I think that maybe we have a responsibility to not let this platform fade away.

01:06:55

In fact, I now see an opportunity for us to create something together and not have it just be another hierarchical organization that depends upon a few people to give it direction.

01:07:02

We are a very large assemblage of like-minded people.

01:07:06

Most likely, no more than half of us have actually used psychedelic medicines

01:07:11

to any significant degree,

01:07:13

but we all have that special flavor of consciousness,

01:07:16

one that wants to continually expand the range of our consciousness,

01:07:21

even if it’s just in conversation with others of a similar mindset.

01:07:46

I’d like very much for you and for all of our other fellow salonners Thank you. thinkers who create and share their own views and audio works of art with one another. You may have created some original music, possibly including some sound bites from talks that we’ve heard here

01:07:51

in the salon in the past. Maybe you have some recordings from conferences that you attended.

01:07:56

I happen to know of at least two people who will be attending Burning Man for the first time this

01:08:01

year and who have shown an interest in recording some of the lectures that are going to be held there. I could go on, but I suspect that you get the idea. There’s a

01:08:10

whole world of audio treats that most of us will never hear about unless you or one of our other

01:08:16

fellow salonners records it, creates a podcast out of it, and then submits it to our community for

01:08:21

consideration and being included as a podcast.

01:08:31

And that’s where we have a lot of work to do before I come to the end of these Terrence McKenna tapes next March.

01:08:37

Let’s take a best-case scenario, one where there are hundreds of audiophiles submitted for consideration.

01:08:39

An embarrassment of riches, so to speak.

01:08:45

How do we sort through all of them and pick out the ones that have the widest appeal to our community?

01:08:49

That’s the big question, and, well, it’s one that I don’t have an answer for just yet.

01:08:56

I’m hoping that a discussion about this will develop on our forums, where I’ve already posted a few of my own ideas,

01:09:02

and I’ll link to that section of the forums in today’s program notes, which you’ll find at psychedelicsalon.com.

01:09:07

But just to give you a few thoughts from which to springboard your own ideas,

01:09:13

it seems to me that it may be a good idea to copy some of the more successful processes that have already been working on the net.

01:09:16

For example, combining Amazon’s concept of allowing anyone to be a reviewer of a book

01:09:22

and to post a comment about it, well, that could be one part.

01:09:26

And Reddit’s system of rating stories according to the community’s votes is another.

01:09:31

Maybe using some combination of those processes might be a way for anyone to create a program.

01:09:36

In fact, it could even be an existing program from their own podcast series.

01:09:40

And once you’ve created a program, you could submit it and request reviews and votes,

01:09:46

with the ones that rise to the top being podcast as part of the salon’s ongoing series.

01:09:52

Or we can do it a completely different way. The only two things that I’d like to see maintained

01:09:57

are a continuation of the no advertising policy that I’ve been following since I began these

01:10:03

podcasts, and finding a way for the community to select the new programs

01:10:07

without requiring some kind of committee to make the decisions.

01:10:12

Ultimately, what we wind up with may not look anything like my current vision,

01:10:17

but that depends upon you and our other fellow salonners

01:10:20

becoming more involved in the discussions over on the forums

01:10:24

or in the comment sections of these podcasts. Over the coming weeks and months, I expect to be talking

01:10:31

about this in almost all of the podcasts in hopes of getting you to become involved in this project.

01:10:37

We all know what a mess this world is right now, and I don’t expect things to improve unless people

01:10:42

like you and me stand up and are counted.

01:10:46

Maybe you have an idea about this that you think is trivial,

01:10:48

but what if that idea is the catalyst that sparks a key idea in someone else?

01:10:54

If you’ve been with us for a while here in the salon, you’ve heard me cite that famous Gandhi quote,

01:10:59

What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.

01:11:06

In closing, I’d like to replay the last few minutes of the Terrence McKenna talk that I played last week.

01:11:12

It made a big impact on me, but I’m afraid that it may have been drowned out by my announcement that followed it.

01:11:19

So listen closely right now to what Terrence is saying and see if it resonates with you.

01:11:24

Listen closely right now to what Terrence is saying and see if it resonates with you.

01:11:29

Now we have to go forward into the past.

01:11:36

This is the way to create a unified meaning to what has happened to us. Because if this just ends in a toxified and ruined planet,

01:11:42

then what a comment on the values that we hold most dear,

01:11:50

our belief that life is for something, our belief that integrity matters, our belief that our

01:11:57

transmission from generation to generation was something that was important. The meaning of it all is in the hands of the living.

01:12:12

Those people 100,000 years in the grave,

01:12:16

their meaning is in our hands

01:12:19

because the question is what shall we do with what they have given us?

01:12:27

That’s no small charge, you know.

01:12:30

The meaning of your ancestors’ lives is in your hands.

01:12:35

And I know that you’re not going to let this moment pass

01:12:38

without picking up the baton and sprinting to the finish line in the memory of them.

01:12:44

And hopefully this will also help us grow the Salon’s community into a

01:12:48

thriving place where our friends that, well, friends that we’ve not yet met

01:12:51

can find us, us others.

01:12:55

And for now, this is Lorenzo signing off from

01:12:58

Cyberdelic Space. Be well, my friends.